Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-rwnhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T22:21:21.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crossing boundaries: more evidence for phonological constraints on early multi-word utterances*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Edward H. Matthei
Edward H. Matthei*
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
*
Department of Cognitive Sciences, School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92717, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A number of researchers have argued that phonological constraints may influence the emergence and form of combinatorial speech in children. Donahue (1986) presented evidence that one child's consonant harmony constraint operated across word boundaries. This paper presents further evidence for the operation of word-level phonological constraints in multi-word utterances. Selection and avoidance patterns as well as her modifications of adult forms indicate the presence of a syllable sequencing constraint in this child's grammar: an initial syllable must begin with a consonant whose sonority value is not less than that of the following syllable. The same constraint governs the form of her early word combinations. The existence of evidence for the operation of word-level constraints in word combinations, it is pointed out, has consequences for how we interpret two-lexicon models of phonological development.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , February 1989 , pp. 41 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I wish to thank E and her parents for participating in this study. Betsy Sagey and Virginia Mann contributed occasional sympathetic ears and advice, for which I would like to express my appreciation. And last, and certainly not least, I would like to express my gratitude to Stacy Trytten who collected virtually all of the data and assisted in analysing the transcripts. I accept responsibility for all errors and infelicities committed here. Portions of this paper were presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting in December 1987.

References

REFERENCES

Branigan, G. (1979). Some reasons why successive single word utterances are not. Journal of Child Language 6. 411–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, P. & de Villiers, J. (1978). Simplifying phonological processes in the one- and two-word stage. Paper presented at the Conference on Language Development, Boston University.Google Scholar
Donahue, M. (1986). Phonological constraints on the emergence of two-word utterances. Journal of Child Language 13. 209–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, C. (1979). Phonology as an individual access system: some data from language acquisition. In Filmore, C., Kempler, D. & Wang, W. (eds), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Forster, K. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In Wales, R. & Walker, E. (eds), New approaches to language mechanisms. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Forster, K. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In Cooper, W. & Walker, E. (eds), Sentence processing: psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. & McCully, C. (1987). Metrical phonology: a course book. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1979). Phonological patterns in the speech of young children. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds), Language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Macken, M. (1980). The child's lexical representation: the ‘puzzle-puddle-pickle’ evidence. Journal of Linguistics 16. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, L. (1983). Development of articulatory, phonetic, and phonological capabilities. In Butterworth, B. (ed.), Language production: development, writing and other language processes. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Priestly, T. (1977). One idiosyncratic strategy in the acquisition of phonology. Journal of Child Language 4. 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. (1976). Conversations with a one-year-old: a case study of the developmental foundation of syntax. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1984). On the major class features and syllable theory. In Aronoff, M. & Oehrle, R. (eds), Language and sound structure: studies in phonology presented to Morris Halle by his teacher and students. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Smith, N. (1978). Lexical representation and the acquisition of phonology. In B. Kachru (ed.), Linguistics in the seventies: directions and prospects. Special issue of Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 8. 259–73.Google Scholar
Spencer, A. (1986). Towards a theory of phonological development. Lingua 68. 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. (1976). From pre-speech to speech: on early phonology. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development. No. 12.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. (1981). Phonology and the development of the lexicon: evidence from children's errors. Journal of Child Language 8. 239–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vihman, M. (1982). A note on children's lexical representations. Journal of Child Language 9. 249–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterson, N. (1978). Growth of complexity in phonological development. In Waterson, N. & Snow, C. (eds), The development of communication. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wheeler, D. & Iverson, G. (1986). Hierarchical structures in child phonology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar