Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:02:09.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acquisition of locative meanings: behind and in front of*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Judith R. Johnston
Judith R. Johnston
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies of locatives suggest regularities in order and age of acquisition, including systematic changes in context of use for behind and in front of. The present investigation extends earlier work by utilizing more naturalistic elicitation procedures and exploring an early use of behind and in front of with large reference objects. Thirty-three children, ages 2; 7 to 4; 7, told puppets where to look for missing objects. Results indicate an order of acquisition for English locatives which is consistent with prior reports. However, the puppet story method elicited given locatives at younger ages, and the first uses of behind occurred with large, non-featured reference objects. The patterns of use for behind and in front of suggest an acquisition process in which new conceptual resources lead to the re-analysis of object configurations and thus to new aspects of meaning.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 1984 , pp. 407 - 422
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This report is derived from a dissertation project under the direction of D. Slobin, University of California, Berkeley. Address for correspondence: Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, U.S.A.

References

REFERENCES

Ames, L. B. & Learnerd, J. (1948). The development of verbalized space in the young child. JGenetPsychol 72. 63–84.Google ScholarPubMed
Antinucci, F. & Miller, R. (1976). How children talk about what happened. JChLang 3. 167–89.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1972). Some perceptual factors in the acquisition of locative terms by young children. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 8. 431–9.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1977). Strategies and the mapping problem in first language acquisition. In Macnamara, J. (ed.), Language learning and thought. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1980). Here's the top: nonlinguistic strategies in the acquisition of orientational terms. ChDev 51. 329–38.Google Scholar
Clark, H. (1973). Space, time, semantics and the child. In Moore, T. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H., Carpenter, P. & Just, M. (1973). On the meeting of semantics and perception. In Chase, W. G. (ed.), Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cromer, R. (1976). The cognitive hypothesis of language acquisition and its implications for child language deficiency. In Morehead, D. & Morehead, A. (eds), Normal and deficient child language. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
de Villiers, P. & de Villiers, J. (1974). On this, that and the other: non-egocentrism in very young children. JExpChPsychol 18. 438–47.Google Scholar
Durkin, K. (1980). The production of locative prepositions by young school children. EdStud 6. 9–30.Google Scholar
Durkin, K. (1981). Aspects of late language acquisition: school children's use and comprehension of prepositions. First Language 2. 47–59.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1973). Some strategies for the first two years. In Dil, A. (ed.), Language acquisition and communicative choice: essays by Susan Ervin-Tripp. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, L. & Strommen, E. (1972). The role of front-back features in children's ‘front’, ‘back’ and ‘beside’ placements of objects. MPQ 18. 259–71.Google Scholar
Holmes, T. C. (1932). Comprehension of some sizes, shapes, and positions by young children. ChDev 3. 269–73.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. & Slobin, D. I. (1979). The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian, and Turkish. JChLang 6. 529–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Kubena, M. (1975). An experimental study of the comprehension and expression of prepositions of location and direction of movement in the speech of children. Paper presented at the American Speech and Hearing Association convention.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. & Maratsos, M. (1975). On the acquisition of front, back and side. ChDev 46. 202–10.Google Scholar
Pierart, J. (1977). L'acquisition du sens des marquers de relation spatiale ‘devant’ et ‘derrière’. Anniée de Psychologie 77. 96–116.Google Scholar
Sinha, C. & Walkerdine, V. (1975). Functional and perceptual aspects of the acquisition of spatial relation terms. Unpublished paper, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.Google Scholar
Tanz, C. (1976). Studies in the acquisition of deictic terms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Washington, D. & Naremore, R. (1978). Children's use of spatial prepositions in two and three dimensional tasks. JSHR 21. 151–65.Google Scholar
Windmiller, M. (1973). The relationship between a child's conception of space and his comprehension and production of spatial locatives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar