Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-956mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T09:12:29.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acquisition of complementation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Lois Bloom ,
Matthew Rispoli ,
Barbara Gartner  and
Jeremie Hafitz
Lois Bloom*
Affiliation:
Teachers College, Columbia University
Matthew Rispoli
Affiliation:
Teachers College, Columbia University
Barbara Gartner
Affiliation:
Teachers College, Columbia University
Jeremie Hafitz
Affiliation:
Teachers College, Columbia University
*
Teachers College, Columbia University, 525 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study concerns the acquisition of complex sentences with perception and epistemic verbs that take a second verb in their complements. The acquisition of complementation began between two and three years of age in this longitudinal study of four children's spontaneous speech. The results of the study showed that (1) complement types and complementizer connectives and (2) the discourse contexts in which complementation occurred were specific to individual matrix verbs. The most frequent verbs acquired were the perception verbs see and look and the epistemic verbs think and know. Developments in both discourse and syntax indicated that these verbs expressed attitudes of certainty/uncertainty toward the content expressed in their complements. The results are discussed in terms of both linguistic and psychological factors in the acquisition of complex sentences with complementation.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , February 1989 , pp. 101 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The research reported here was funded by research grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health, for which we are grateful. The results of this study were originally presented to the Fifth Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, October 1980. We thank Patsy Lightbown and Lois (Hood) Holzman for their contribution to the study of these children's language development over a period of several years. We owe a particular debt of gratitude to the children – Eric, Gia, Kathryn and Peter – who, although they are now entering their adult years, have always been two-year-olds to us. In their words and the details of that year of their lives, they unwittingly provided us with much to ponder. We thank Richard Beckwith and Margaret Lahey for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.

References

REFERENCES

Abbeduto, L. & Rosenberg, S. (1985). Children's knowledge of the presuppositions of know and other cognitive verbs. Journal of Child Language 12. 621–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bever, T. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: form and junction in emerging grammars Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1981). The importance of language for language development: linguistic determinism in the 1980s. In Winitz, H. (ed.), Native language and non-native language acquisition. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Lahey, M., Hood, L., Lifter, K. & Fiess, K. (1980). Complex sentences: acquisition of syntactic connectives and the meaning relations they encode. Journal of Child Language 7. 235–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L., Merkin, S. & Wootten, J. (1982). Wh-questions: linguistic factors that contribute to the sequence of acquisition. Child Development 53. 1084–92.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Miller, P. & Hood, L. (1975). Variation and reduction as aspects of competence in language development. In Pick, A. (ed.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Tackeff, J. & Lahey, M. (1984). Learning to in complement constructions. Journal of Child Language 11. 391–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bretherton, I. & Beeghly, M. (1982). Talking about internal states: the acquisition of an explicit theory of mind. Developmental Psychology 18. 906–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Chafe, W. & Nichols, J. (eds), Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Choi, S. (1986). Pragmatic analysis of Korean modal markers in children's speech. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New York.Google Scholar
Fay, T. (1980). Transformational errors. In Fromkin, V. (ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: slips of the tongue, ear, pen and hand. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. (1977). The development of knowledge about visual perception. In Keasey, C. (ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: social cognitive development. Lincoln/London: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
Fodor, J., Garrett, M. & Bever, T. (1968). Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity. II. Verb structure. Perception and Psychophysics 3. 453–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1956). A modern English grammar. Vol. 3. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (1982). Acquisition of mental verbs and the concept of mind. In Kuczaj, S. (ed.), Language development. Vol. 1. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. & Maratsos, M. (1977). Early comprehension of mental verbs: think and know. Child Development 48. 1743–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limber, J. (1973). The genesis of complex sentences. In Moore, T. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nishigauchi, T. & Roeper, T. (1987). Deductive parameters and the growth of empty categories. In Roeper, T. & Williams, E. (eds), Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1955). The language and thought of the child. Cleveland OH: World Publishing. (Originally published in 1923.)Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1972). A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. (1967). The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Shatz, M., Wellman, H. & Silber, S. (1983). The acquisition of mental verbs: a systematic investigation of the first reference to mental state. Cognition 14. 301–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urmson, S. (1963). Parenthetical verbs. In Caton, C. (ed.), Philosophy and ordinary language. Urbana IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Viberg, A. (1984). The verbs of perception: a typological study. In Butterworth, B., Comrie, B. & Dahl, O. (eds), Explanations for language universals. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. (1985). The child's theory of mind: the development of conceptions of cognition. In Yussen, S. (ed.), The growth of reflection in children. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar