Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T18:20:55.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Narrative discourse in Grammatical specific language impaired children: a modular language deficit?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1997

HEATHER K. J. VAN DER LELY
HEATHER K. J. VAN DER LELY
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper provides a further investigation into the linguistic abilities of a subgroup of 12 Grammatical specific language impaired (SLI) children (aged 10;2 to 13;11). The study investigates the use of referential expressions (e.g. pronouns) in a narrative discourse, and provides insight into the underlying nature of Grammatical SLI, thereby contributing to the modularity debate. Previous investigations indicate that Grammatical SLI children have a deficit with dependent structural relationships, i.e. a Representational Deficit for Dependent Relationships (RDDR). Grammatical SLI children's RDDR appears to be a modular language deficit. To test this claim, linguistic representations of dependent structural relationships which are not part of the modular language system are investigated using a narrative discourse based on the picture book Frog where are you? The SLI children's pattern of referential expressions was compared with 36 language ability controls (aged 6;4 to 9;8). The findings indicated that the Grammatical SLI children have relatively mature linguistic development in the use of referential expressions to produce a cohesive, structured narrative discourse. The view of the organisation of the mind in which a modular language system can be differentially impaired from aspects of language which rely on the central system can most easily account for the data. Thus, the data support the hypothesized modular nature of Grammatical SLI children's underlying linguistic deficit. The implications of the findings for language acquisition are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , February 1997 , pp. 221 - 256
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Linda Stollwerck for all her help with this study; Annette Karmiloff-Smith and Neil Smith for their insightful comments on an earlier draft of this paper; Corrine Haynes, the other speech and language therapists and the teachers for their help and cooperation and the children who participated in this study from Dawn House School, Nottingham, St Georges School, London and Picklenash Junior School, Newent. The study was supported by a British Medical Research Council Project grant G9123179N and a British Academy post doctoral Fellowship awarded to the author which are gratefully acknowledged.