Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T15:28:13.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Motherese, affect, and vocabulary development: dyadic communicative interactions in infants and toddlers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Shruti DAVE ,
Ann M. MASTERGEORGE  and
Lesley B. OLSWANG
Shruti DAVE*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, USA
Ann M. MASTERGEORGE
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University, USA
Lesley B. OLSWANG
Affiliation:
University of Washington, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Responsive parental communication during an infant's first year has been positively associated with later language outcomes. This study explores responsivity in mother–infant communication by modeling how change in guiding language between 7 and 11 months influences toddler vocabulary development. In a group of 32 mother–child dyads, change in early maternal guiding language positively predicted child language outcomes measured at 18 and 24 months. In contrast, a number of other linguistic variables – including total utterances and non-guiding language – did not correlate with toddler vocabulary development, suggesting a critical role of responsive change in infant-directed communication. We further assessed whether maternal affect during early communication influenced toddler vocabulary outcomes, finding that dominant affect during early mother–infant communications correlated to lower child language outcomes. These findings provide evidence that responsive parenting should not only be assessed longitudinally, but unique contributions of language and affect should also be concurrently considered in future study.

Keywords

guiding languagemothereseaffective communication
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , July 2018 , pp. 917 - 938
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akhtar, N., Dunham, F., & Dunham, P. J. (1991). Directive interactions and early vocabulary development: the role of joint attentional focus. Journal of Child Language, 18(1), 41–9.Google Scholar
Albrecht, K., & Miller, L. G. (2001). Innovations: infant and toddler development. New York, NY: Gryphon.Google Scholar
Billingsley, F. F., White, O. R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: a rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229–41.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Tinker, E., & Scholnick, E. K. (2001). The intentionality model and language acquisition: engagement, effort, and the essential tension in development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1–101.Google Scholar
Bortfeld, H. (2004). Which came first: infants learning language or motherese? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 505–6.Google Scholar
Bretherton, I. (1995). A communication perspective on attachment relationships and internal working models. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60(2/3), 310–29.Google Scholar
Brodsky, P., Waterfall, H. R., & Edelman, S. (2007). Characterizing motherese: on the computational structure of child-directed language. In McNamara, D. S. & Trafton, J. G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Cognitive Science Society Conference (pp. 833–8). Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Brooks, R., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2008). Infant gaze following and pointing predict accelerated vocabulary growth through two years of age: a longitudinal, growth curve modeling study. Journal of Child Language, 35, 207–20.Google Scholar
Carroll, D. W. (2007). Psychology of language. Australia: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. E., & Beckwith, L. (1976). Maternal language in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 12(4), 371–2.Google Scholar
Dominey, P., & Dodane, C. (2004). Interdeterminancy in language acquisition: the role of child directed speech and joint attention. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17(2/3), 121–45.Google Scholar
Estes, K. G., Evans, J. L., Alibali, M. W., & Saffran, J. R. (2007). Can infants map meaning to newly segmented words? Statistical segmentation and word learning. Psychological Science, 18(3), 254–60.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D. J., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: user's guide and technical manual, 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. (1993). Approval and disapproval: infant responsiveness to vocal affect in familiar and unfamiliar languages. Child Development, 64(3), 657–74.Google Scholar
Fernald, A., & Kuhl, P. (1987). Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech. Infant Behavior and Development, 10(3), 279–93.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., Ping, R., Decatur, M. A., Larson, S., & Zinchenko, E. (2012). Gesture predicts readiness-to-learn in adults learning a complex spatial task. Cognitive Processing, 13, S31–S34.Google Scholar
Hirotani, M., Stets, M., Striano, T., & Friederici, A. D. (2008). Joint attention helps infants learn new words: event-related potential evidence. NeuroReport, 20(6), 600–5.Google Scholar
Hurtado, N., Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, A. (2008). Does input influence uptake? Links between maternal talk, processing speed and vocabulary size in Spanish-learning children. Developmental Science, 11(6), F31–F39.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Haight, W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M., & Lyons, T. (1991). Early vocabulary growth: relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology, 27(2), 236–48.Google Scholar
Kitamura, C., & Burnham, D. (2003). Pitch and communicative intent in mother's speech: adjustments for age and sex in the first year. Infancy, 4(1), 85–110.Google Scholar
Kitamura, C., & Lam, C. (2009). Age-specific preferences for infant-directed affective intent. Infancy, 14(1), 77–100.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Padden, D., Nelson, T., & Pruitt, J. (2005). Early speech perception and later language development: implications for the ‘Critical Period’. Language Learning and Development, 1(3/4), 237–64.Google Scholar
Lalonde, C. E., & Werker, J. F. (1995). Cognitive influences on cross-language speech perception in infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 18(4), 459–75.Google Scholar
Landry, S. H., Smith, K. E., & Swank, P. R. (2006). Responsive parenting: establishing early foundations for social, communication, and independent problem-solving skills. Developmental Psychology, 42(4), 627–42.Google Scholar
Landry, S. H., Smith, K. E., Swank, P. R., Assel, M. A., & Vellet, S. (2001). Does early responsive parenting have a special importance for children's development or is consistency across early childhood necessary? Developmental Psychology, 37(3), 387–403.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, A. (2008). Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood. Developmental Science, 11(3), F9–F16.Google Scholar
Masur, E. F., Flynn, V., & Eichorst, D. L. (2005). Maternal responsive and directive behaviours and utterances as predictors of children's lexical development. Journal of Child Language, 32(1), 63–91.Google Scholar
McCathren, R. B., Yoder, P. J., & Warren, S. F. (1995). The role of directives in early language intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 19(2), 91–101.Google Scholar
Melby, J. N., Conger, R. D., Book, R., Rueter, M., Lucy, L., Repinski, D., & Scaramella, L. (1993). The Iowa Family Interaction Rating Scales. Ames: Institute for Social and Behavioral Research, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N., & Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Faces and speech: intermodal processing of biologically relevant signals in infants and adults. In Lewkowicz, D. J. & Lickliter, R., (Eds.), The development of intersensory perception: comparative perspectives (pp. 335–69). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mumme, D. L., & Fernald, A. (2003). The infant as onlooker: learning from emotional reactions observed in a television scenario. Child Development, 74(1), 221–37.Google Scholar
Mundy, P., & Newell, L. (2007). Attention, joint attention, and social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(5), 269–74.Google Scholar
Murray, L., & Trevarthen, C. (1986). The infant's role in mother–infant communications. Journal of Child Language, 13(1), 15–29.Google Scholar
Niwano, K., & Sugai, K. (2002). Intonation contour of Japanese maternal infant-directed speech and infant vocal response. Japanese Journal of Special Education, 39, 59–68.Google Scholar
Nozadi, S. S., Spinrad, T. L., Eisenberg, N., Bolnick, R., Eggum-Wilkens, N. D., Smith, C. L., Gaertner, B., Kupfer, A., & Sallquist, J. (2013). Prediction of toddlers’ expressive language from maternal sensitivity and toddlers’ anger expressions: a developmental perspective. Infant Behavior and Development, 36(4), 650–61.Google Scholar
Page, M., Wilhelm, M. S., Gamble, W. C., & Card, N. A. (2010). A comparison of maternal sensitivity and verbal stimulation as unique predictors of infant social–emotional and cognitive development. Infant Behavior and Development, 33(1), 101–10.Google Scholar
Pine, J. M. (1992). Maternal style at the early one-word stage: re-evaluating the stereotype of the directive mother. First Language, 12, 169–86.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, M. L., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). Early gesture selectively predicts later language learning. Developmental Science, 12(1), 182–7.Google Scholar
Rowe., M. L., Raudenbush, S. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2012). The pace of vocabulary growth helps predict later vocabulary skill. Child Development, 83(2), 508–25.Google Scholar
Saint-Georges, C., Chetouani, M., Cassel, R., Apicella, F., Mahdhaoui, A., Muratori, F., & Cohen, D. (2013). Motherese in interaction: at the cross-road of emotion and cognition? (A systematic review). PloS one, 8(10), e78103.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (2010). Good parenting: making a difference. Early Human Development, 86(11), 689–93.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. (1972). Mothers’ speech to children learning language. Child Development, 43(2), 549–65.Google Scholar
Soderstrom, M., & Morgan, J. L. (2007). Twenty-two-month-olds discriminate fluent from disfluent adult-directed speech. Developmental Science, 10, 641–53.Google Scholar
Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bornstein, M. H., & Baumwell, L. (2001). Maternal responsiveness and children's achievement of language milestones. Child Development, 72(3), 748–67.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2001). Perceiving intentions and learning words in the second year of life. In Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 132–58). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(5), 675–90.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Farrar, M. J. (1986). Joint attention and early language. Child Development, 57(6), 1454–63.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Mannle, S., & Kruger, A. C. (1986). Linguistic environment of 1- to 2-year-old twins. Developmental Psychology, 22(2), 169–76.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Todd, J. (1983). Joint attention and lexical acquisition style. First Language, 4(12), 197–211.Google Scholar
Werner, S., & Keller, E. (1994). Prosodic aspects of speech. In Keller, E. (Ed.), Fundamentals of speech synthesis and speech recognition: basic concepts, state of the art, the future challenges, (pp. 23–40). Chickester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, M. B., & Shapka, J. (2012). Playing with technology: mother–toddler interaction scores lower during play with electronic toys. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33(5), 211–18.Google Scholar