Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:23:14.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Infant-directed speech facilitates lexical learning in adults hearing Chinese: implications for language acquisition*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Roberta Michnick Golinkoff  and
Anthony Alioto
Roberta Michnick Golinkoff*
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
Anthony Alioto
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
*
Department of Educational Studies, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments 1 and 2 examined the effects of infant-directed (ID) speech on adults' ability to learn an individual target word in sentences in an unfamiliar, non-Western language (Chinese). English-speaking adults heard pairs of sentences read by a female, native Chinese speaker in either ID or adult-directed (AD) speech. The pairs of sentences described slides of 10 common objects. The Chinese name for the object (the target word) was placed in an utterance-final position in experiment? (n= 61) and in a medial position in experiment 2 (n= 79). At test, each Chinese target word was presented in isolation in AD speech in a recognition task. Only subjects who heard ID speech with the target word in utterance-final position demonstrated learning of the target words. The results support assertions that ID speech, which tends to put target words in sentence-final position, may assist infants in segmenting and remembering portions of the linguistic stream. In experiment 3 (n= 23), subjects judged whether each of the ID and AD speech samples prepared for experiments ? and 2 were directed to an adult or to an infant. Judgements were above chance for two types of sentence: ID speech with the target word in the final position and AD speech with the target word in a medial position. In addition to indirectly confirming the results of experiments 1 and 2, these findings suggest that at least some of the prosodic features which comprise ID speech in Chinese and English must overlap.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , October 1995 , pp. 703 - 726
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

The pilot version of these studies was conducted as an honours thesis completed by the second author under the supervision of the first author. We wish to thank Tim Konoid and Betty McGrath for their statistical assistance, Steven Hoskins for the acoustic analyses, and Wenjun Ruan and Jenny Wong for their help in producing the stimulus tapes. We also thank the Honours Program at the University of Delaware and, in particular, Dr Joan Bennett, for their support. Peter Jusczyk gave us excellent comments on an earlier draft. Alioto is presently at Kent State University.

References

REFERENCES

Adamson, L. B. & Bakeman, R. (1991). The development of shared attention during infancy. In Vasta, R. (ed.), Annals of child development, Volume 8. London: Kingsley.Google Scholar
Akhtar, N., Dunham, F. & Dunham, P. J. (1991). Directive interactions and early vocabulary development: the role of joint attentional focus. Journal of Child Language 18, 41–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aslin, R. N. (1992). Segmentation of fluent speech into words: learning models and the role of maternal input. In de Boysson-Bardies, B., Schonen, S., Jusczyk, P., MacNeilage, P. & Morton, J. (eds), Developmental neurocognition: speech and face processing in the first year of life. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Beach, C. M. (1991). The interpretation of prosodic patterns at points of syntactic structure ambiguity: evidence for cue trading relations. Journal of Memory and Language 30, 644–63.Google Scholar
Bernstein-Ratner, N. (1986). Durational cues which mark clause boundaries in mother-child speech. Journal of Phonetics 14, 303–9.Google Scholar
Bock, J. K. & Mazzella, J. R. (1983). Intonational marking of given and new information: some consequences for comprehension. Memory and Cognition 11, 64–76.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1983). Prosodic structure and the given/new distinction. In Cutler, A. & Ladd, D. R. (eds), Prosody: models and measurements. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Cole, R. & Jakimik, J. (1980). A model of speech perception. In Cole, R. (ed.), Perception and production affluent speech. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. P. & Aslin, R. N. (1990). Preference for infant-directed speech in the first month after birth. Child Development 61, 1584–95.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. & Paccia-Cooper, J. (1980). Syntax and speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. & Butterfield, S. (1992). Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: evidence from juncture misperception. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 281–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A. (1985). Four-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese. Infant Behavior and Development 8, 181–95.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. (1989). Intonation and communicative intent in mothers' speech to infants: is the melody the message? Child Development 60, 1497–510.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. (1991). Prosody in speech to children: prelinguistic and linguistic functions. In Vasta, R. (ed.), Annals of child development, Vol. 8. London: Kingsley.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. & Mazzie, C. (1991). Prosody and focus in speech to infants and adults. Developmental Psychology 27, 209–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A., McRoberts, G. & Herrera, C. (in press). Effects of prosody and word position on lexical comprehension in infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. & Morikawa, H. (1993). Common themes and cultural variations in Japanese and American mothers' speech to infants. Child Development 64, 637–56.Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Taeschner, T., Dunn, J., Papousek, M., de Boysson-Bardies, B. & Fukui, I. (1989). A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers' and fathers' speech to preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language 16, 477–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gleitman, L. R., Gleitman, H., Landau, B. & Wanner, E. (1987). Where learning begins: initial representations for language learning. In Newmeyer, F. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Vol. 3. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Goldfield, B. A. (1993). Noun bias in maternal speech to one-year-olds. Journal of Child Language 20, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldfield, B. A. & Reznick, S. J. (1990). Early lexical acquisition: rate, content, and the vocabulary spurt. Journal of Child Language 17, 171–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golinkoff, R. M., Alioto, A., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Kaufman, D. (1992). Infants learn lexical items better in infant-directed than in adult-directed speech. Boston Child Language Conference.Google Scholar
Grieser, D. L. & Kuhl, P. K. (1988). Maternal speech to infants in a tonal language: support for universal prosodic features in motherese. Developmental Psychology 24, 14–20.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M. (1993). Skeletal supports for grammatical learning: what the infant brings to the language learning task. Advances in infancy research, Vol. 8. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Kemler Nelson, D., Jusczyk, P., Cassidy, K., Druss, B. & Kennedy, L. (1987). Clauses are perceptual units for young infants. Cognition 26, 269–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoff-Ginsburg, E. (1990). Maternal speech and the child's development of syntax: a further look. Journal of Child Language 17, 85–99.Google Scholar
Hoff-Ginsburg, E. & Shatz, M. (1982). Linguistic input and the child's acquisition of language. Psychological Bulletin 92, 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W. (1989). Perception of cues to clausal units in native and non-native languages. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City, MO.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Kemler Nelson, D. G., Kennedy, L., Woodward, A. & Piwoz, J. (1992). Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants. Cognitive Psychology 24, 252–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karzon, R. G. (1985). Discrimination of polysyllabic sequences by one- to four-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39, 326–42.Google Scholar
Kemler Nelson, D. G., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Jusczyk, P. W. & Wright Cassidy, K. (1989). How the prosodic cues in motherese might assist language learning. Journal of Child Language 16, 53–68.Google Scholar
Lederer, A. & Kelly, M. (1991). Prosodic correlates to the adjunct/complement distinction in motherese. Papers and Reports in Child Language 30.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1973). Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity. Glossa 7, 107–22.Google Scholar
Masur, E. F. (1982). Mothers' responses to infants' object-related gestures: influences on lexical development. Journal of Child Language 9, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, J. (1986). From simple input to complex grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. L., Meier, R. P. & Newport, E. L. (1987). Structural packaging in the input to language learning: contributions of prosodic and morphological marking of phrases to the acquisition of language. Cognitive Psychology 19, 498–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newport, E. (1991). Contrasting conceptions of the critical period for language. In Carey, S. & Gelman, R. (eds), The epigenesis of mind: essays on biology and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Newport, E., Gleitman, L. & Gleitman, H. (1977). ‘Mother, I'd rather do it myself’: some effects and non-effects of motherese. In Snow, C. & Ferguson, C. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: C. U. P.Google Scholar
Pilon, R. (1981). Segmentation of speech in a foreign language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 10, 113–22.Google Scholar
Repp, B. H. (1982). Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin 92, 81–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santarcangelo, S. & Dyer, K. (1988). Prosodic aspects of motherese: effects on gaze and responsiveness in developmentally disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 46, 406–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. II. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smith, C. B., Adamson, L. B. & Bakeman, R. (1988). Interactional predictors of early language. First Language 8, 143–56.Google Scholar
Speer, S. R., Crowder, R. G. & Thomas, L. M. (1993). Prosodic structure and sentence recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 32, 336–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1988). The role of joint attentional processes in early language development. Language Sciences 10, 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Farrar, M. J. (1986). Joint attention and early language. Child Development 57, 1454–63.Google Scholar
Trehub, S. E., Unyk, A. M. & Trainor, L. J. (1993). Maternal singing in cross-cultural perspective. Infant Behavior and Development 16, 285–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Riper, C. (1950). Teaching your child to talk. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers.Google Scholar
Wakefield, J. R., Donghtie, E. B. & Yom, B.-H. L. (1974). The identification of structural components of an unknown language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 3, 261–9.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F. & McLeod, P. J. (1989). Infant preference for both male and female infant-directed talk: a developmental study of attentional and affective responsiveness. Canadian Journal of Psychology 43, 230–46.Google Scholar
Wolff, P. H. (1963). Observations on the early development of smiling. In Foss, B. M. (ed.), Determinants of infant behavior, II. London: Methuen.Google Scholar