Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:22:28.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of the full passive*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Dianne Horgan
Dianne Horgan
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spontaneous full passives and related constructions from 234 children aged 2; 0 to 13; 11 and elicited passives from 262 college students were analysed. Full passives were classified as REVERSIBLE (The dog was chased by the girl), INSTRUMENTAL NON-REVERSIBLE (The lamp was broken by (or with) the ball), or AGENTIVE NON-REVERSIBLE (The lamp was broken by the girl). The Agentive non-reversible did not appear until after age 9; and until age 11 no child produced both Reversible and Non-reversible passives. All the children used the passive in a semantically restricted way (but not in the same way). The possible developmental course of the full passive was traced for children who initially used only Reversible passives versus those who initially used only Instrumental non-reversible passives.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , February 1978 , pp. 65 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

A version of this paper was presented at the First Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 1 October 1976. The data from the youngest children are from part of my doctoral dissertation, Horgan (1975). I am grateful to Terry Horgan, Wilbur Hass, John Lawler, Klaus Riegel, Michael Maratsos, and John Miyamoto for comments on an earlier draft of this paper. I am deeply indebted to Wilbur Hass for providing me access to the data on older children referred to below. Address for correspondence: Department of Educational Psychology, Indiana University, 2805 East Tenth Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47401, U.S.A.

References

REFERENCES

Baldi, P. (1974). Reciprocal verbs and symmetric predicates. Papers from the Tenth Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Baldie, B. (1976). The acquisition of the passive voice. JChLang 3. 331–48.Google Scholar
Bandura, W. & Harris, M. B. (1966). Modification of syntactic style. JExpChPsych 4. 341–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Beilin, H. (1975). Studies in the cognitive basis of language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1973). Early syntactic development: a cross-linguistic study with special reference to Finnish. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1958). Process and content in psycholinguistics. In Glaser, R. (ed.), Current trends in the description and analysis of behavior. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1972). Studies on semantics in generative grammar. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farwell, C. (1976). The early expression of motion and location. Boston University Conference on Language Development.Google Scholar
Harwood, F. W. (1959). Quantitative study of the speech of Australian children. L&S 2. 236–70.Google Scholar
Hayhurst, H. (1967). Some errors of young children in producing passive sentences. JVLVB 6. 634–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, D. (1975). Language development: a cross-methodological study. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Hornby, P. A. & Hass, W. A. (1970). Use of contrastive stress by preschool children. JSHR 3. 395–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. J. & Postal, P. M. (1964). An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1971). Passive resistance. Papers from the Seventh Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. & Munro, P. (1975). Passives and their meaning. Lg 51. 789–830.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1966). Comments on McNeill's paper. In Lyons, J. & Wales, R. J. (eds), Psycholinguistics papers. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. London: C.U.P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maratsos, M. P. & Abraovitch, R. (1975). How children understand full, truncated, and anomalous passives. JVLVB 14. 145–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1974). Three batons for cognitive psychology. In Weimer, W. & Palermo, D. (eds), Cognitive psychology and the symbolic process. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1968). Recall of full and truncated passive sentences in connected discourse. JVLVB 7. 876–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, W. (1970). On two hypotheses concerning psycholinguistics. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wepman, J. M. & Hass, W. A. (1967). Lexical and syntactic indices of children's language development. Paper presented at the International Congress of Linguistics, Bucharest.Google Scholar
Whitehurst, G. J., Ironsmith, M. & Goldfein, M. (1974). Selective imitation of the passive construction through modelling. JExpChPsych 17. 288–302.Google Scholar
Yngve, V. (1962). Computer programs for translation. SciAm 206. 68–76.Google Scholar