Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:41:28.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Myths and Meanings of Intellectuals in Twentieth-Century British National Identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

Thomas William Heyck
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As Stefan Collini remarks in a recent paper comparing twentieth-century French and British intellectuals, the sense that Britain has had no intellectuals has been a significant element in British national identity. Collini rightly observes, “Any discussion in contemporary Britain of the topic of ‘intellectuals’ is sooner or later touched by the cliché that the reality of the phenomenon, like the origins of the term, is located in Continental Europe, and that British society, whether for reasons of history, culture or national psychology, is marked by the absence of ‘intellectuals.’” One might add that a closely related assumption has been equally significant: namely, that while the British may have had some intellectuals, they have paid little attention to them. As Denis Brogan once said, in a typical observation on British culture, “We British don't take our intellectuals too seriously.”

The purpose of this article is to suggest an explanation for this feature of British national identity. As the recent literature on national identity tells us, a society's sense of national characteristics is culturally constructed; thus we should be skeptical about any assertions concerning either the absence of intellectuals or the lack of influence by intellectuals in British culture.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 1998 , pp. 192 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Collini, Stefan, “Intellectuals in Britain and France in the Twentieth Century: Confusion, Contrasts—and Convergence?” in Intellectuals in Twentieth-Century France: Mandarins and Samurai, ed. Jennings, Jeremy (London, 1993), p. 199CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Quoted in Crick, Bernard, “The Brains of Britain,” Times Higher Education Supplement (4 January 1983), p. 10Google Scholar.

3 The most notable of the recent books on national identity are Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities (London, 1983)Google Scholar; Hobsbawm, E. J. and Ranger, Terence, eds., The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge, 1983)Google Scholar; and Hobsbawm, E. J., Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality (Cambridge, 1990)Google Scholar.

4 Shaw, George Bernard, “Fanny's First Play,” in The Bodley Head Bernard Shaw: Collected Plays with Their Prefaces (London, 1972), 4:359–360Google Scholar. The omission of apostrophes was part of Shaw's effort to streamline the English language.

5 Shaw, George Bernard, “The Case against Chesterton,” New Statesman (13 May 1916), p. 133Google Scholar.

6 Chesterton, G. K., “The Thing: Why I Am a Catholic,” in The Collected Works of G. K. Chesterton (1929; reprint, San Francisco, 1990), 3:173Google Scholar. I am indebted to Adam Schwartz for this reference.

7 For Orwell's attitudes toward intellectuals, which were bound up with his patriotism, see Crick, Bernard, George Orwell: A Life (Boston, 1980)Google Scholar, esp. the “Introduction” and chaps. 8, 11, and 12.

8 Orwell, George, The Road to Wigan Pier (1937; reprint, New York, 1961), p. 147Google Scholar.

9 Orwell, , The Lion and the Unicorn: Socialism and the English Genius (1940; reprint, London, 1941), p. 46Google Scholar.

10 Ibid., p. 13. See also Orwell, George, “Wells, Hitler and the World State” and “Anti-Semitism in Britain,” both in The Penguin Essays of George Orwell (Harmondsworth, 1984), pp. 196, 291Google Scholar.

11 Pryce-Jones, Alan, “Intellectuals at Sea,” World Review (December 1949), pp. 25–28Google Scholar.

12 Charques, R. D., “The Intellectual in Politics,” Fortnightly (April 1949), pp. 255–59Google Scholar.

13 Nicolson, Harold, “The Intellectual in the English World,” Listener (4 October 1956), pp. 501–2Google Scholar.

14 Fitzgibbon, Constantine, “Gloom and Contempt,” Listener (12 October 1961), pp. 543–45Google Scholar, esp. p. 545.

15 “The Role of Intellectuals” [an anonymous review of Aron's, RaymondL'opium des intellectuels] Times Literary Supplement (16 September 1955), p. 534Google Scholar. See also Caute, David, Communism and French Intellectuals (London, 1964)Google Scholar, which gives a very unfavorable account of French intellectual life, and the anonymous review of Caute's book, “Intellectuals and Communism,” Times Literary Supplement (22 October 1964), pp. 949–50Google Scholar.

16 As is well known, the British, and especially the English, have not always been careful in their usages of “English” and “British”; often they have said “English” when they meant “British,” even in the twentieth century. The literature on national character cited in n. 26 below most often uses “England” or “English,” but the authors sometimes seem to have meant “Britain” or “British.” Given this ambiguity, I have not made the distinction in this article.

17 Newman, Gerald, The Rise of English Nationalism: A Cultural History, 1780–1840 (New York, 1987)Google Scholar; Colley, Linda, Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837 (New Haven, Conn., 1992), esp. p. 252Google Scholar.

18 Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France, ed. O'Brien, Conor Cruise (Harmondsworth, 1986), p. 152Google Scholar.

19 Williams, Raymond, Culture and Society, 1780–1950 (New York, 1958)Google Scholar.

20 Elements of this habit of tradition have been evident in certain cultural movements of post-World War II Britain. See Veldman, Meredith, Fantasy, the Bomb, and the Greening of Britain: Romantic Protest, 1945–1980 (Cambridge, 1994)Google Scholar.

21 See Holloway, John, The Victorian Sage (Hamden, Conn., 1962)Google Scholar; Gross, John, The Rise and Fall of the Man of Letters (1969; reprint, Harmondsworth, 1991)Google Scholar; and Heyck, T. W., The Transformation of Intellectual Life in Victorian England (London, 1982)Google Scholar.

22 See Mill, John Stuart, On Liberty (Harmondsworth, 1987)Google Scholar, esp. chaps. 3 and 4.

23 Heyck, Transformation of Intellectual Life in Victorian England, esp. chaps. 2 and 3; Morrell, Jack and Thackray, Arnold, Gentlemen of Science: Early Years of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Oxford, 1981)Google Scholar.

24 Arnold, Matthew, Culture and Anarchy (Cambridge, 1960), chap. 3, esp. pp. 101, 102, and 105Google Scholar. See also chap. 1.

25 Arnold, Matthew, “German and English Universities,” in The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold, 11 vols., ed. Super, R. H. (Ann Arbor, Mich., 1960–1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, vol. 4, Schools and Universities on the Continent, p. 332.

26 Arnold, Matthew, “The Literary Influence of Academies,” in The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold, ed. Super, vol. 3Google Scholar, Lectures and Essays in Criticism, pp. 235, 241, 243–45, 257.

27 Arnold, Matthew, “On the Study of Celtic Literature,” in The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold, ed. Super, vol. 3Google Scholar, Lectures and Essays in Criticism, pp. 341–51 (emphasis in the original). The quotations are from pp. 344, 348, and 350.

28 Hueffer, Ford Madox, England and the English (New York, 1907)Google Scholar, The Spirit of the People: An Analysis of the English Mind (London, 1907)Google Scholar; Bradley, R. N., Racial Origins of English Character (London, 1926)Google Scholar; Barker, Ernest, National Character and the Factors in Its Formation, 3d ed. (1927; reprint, London, 1939)Google Scholar; Dixon, W. Macneille, The Englishman (London, 1931)Google Scholar; Belloc, Hilaire, An Essay on the Nature of Contemporary England (London, 1937)Google Scholar; Nicolson, Harold, The Meaning of Prestige (Cambridge, 1937)Google Scholar; Lewis, Wyndham, The Mysterious Mr Bull (London, 1938)Google Scholar; Sayers, Dorothy L., The Mysterious English (London, 1941)Google Scholar; Keith, A. Berriedale, Robson, W. A., et al., British Life and Thought (London, 1942)Google Scholar; Brogan, D. W., The English People: Impressions and Observations (New York, 1943)Google Scholar; Orwell, George, The Lion and the Unicorn and The English People (London, 1947)Google Scholar; Barker, Ernest, ed., The Character of England (Oxford, 1947)Google Scholar; Pear, T. H., English Social Differences (London, 1955)Google Scholar; Sampson, Anthony, Anatomy of Britain (London, 1962)Google Scholar; Priestley, J. B., The English (London, 1973)Google Scholar. For observations by foreigners, of which the number is legion, perhaps the most thoughtful is Santayana, George, Madariaga, Salvador, and Baldwin, Leland Dewitt, God's Englishman: The Evolution of the Anglo-Saxon Spirit (Boston, 1944)Google Scholar.

29 This same point has been made by two scholars drawing on different materials: Wiener, Martin, English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit, 1850–1980 (Cambridge, 1981)Google Scholar, esp. chap. 4; and Gervais, David, Literary Englands: Versions of ‘Englishness’ in Modern Writing (Cambridge, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Barker, , ed., The Character of England, pp. 4–5Google Scholar.

30 Priestley, , The English, p. 12Google Scholar. For a discussion of Priestley's admiration of ordinary English/Britons and his identification with them, see LeMahieu, Daniel, A Culture for Democracy (Oxford, 1988), pp. 317–33Google Scholar.

31 Trevelyan, G. M., The English Revolution, 1688–1689 (1938; reprint, Oxford, 1965), p. 3Google Scholar.

32 See Carey, John, The Intellectuals and the Masses: Pride and Prejudice among the Literary Intelligentsia, 1880–1939 (London, 1992)Google Scholar.

33 The Diary of Beatrice Webb, 4 vols., ed. Mackenzie, Norman and Mackenzie, Jeanne (Cambridge, Mass., 1982–1985), vol. 3, 1905–1924, p. 414Google Scholar.

34 Tawney, R. H., The Acquisitive Society (New York, 1920), p. 1Google Scholar.

35 Annan, Noel, “The Intellectual Aristocracy,” in Studies in Social History, ed. Plumb, J. H. (London, 1955), pp. 243–87Google Scholar. Collini, Stefan makes the same point in Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain, 1850–1930 (Oxford, 1991)Google Scholar, esp. chap. 1.

36 Annan, Noel, Our Age: English Intellectuals between the World Wars: A Group Portrait (New York, 1990)Google Scholar.

37 See Heyck, Transformation of Intellectual Life in Victorian England, esp. chaps. 1 and 2.

38 For the professionalization of British society and the continuation of the exclusiveness of the elite schools, see Perkin, Harold, The Professionalization of Society: England since 1880 (London, 1989), esp. pp. 259–66, 448–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Barnett, Correlli, The Collapse of British Power (London, 1972), esp. pt. 2Google Scholar.

39 See Annan, Our Age.

40 Shils, Edward, “The Intellectuals: I. Great Britain,” Encounter (April 1955), pp. 5–16Google Scholar. The quotation is from p. 16. The same point is made by the anonymous reviewer of Aron's, RaymondL'opium des intellectuals: “The Role of the Intellectuals,” pp. 533–534Google Scholar. See also Rubinstein, W. D., Capitalism, Culture, and Decline in Britain, 1750–1990 (London, 1993)Google Scholar.

41 Several scholars have attempted to delineate these meanings: Allen, Peter, “The Meanings of ‘An Intellectual’: Nineteenth and Twentieth-Century Usage,” University of Toronto Quarterly 55 (Summer 1986): 342–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Hickox, M. S., “Has There Been a British Intelligentsia?” British Journal of Sociology 37 (June 1986): 260–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Collini, Stefan, “Intellectuals in Britain and France in the Twentieth Century: Confusions and Contrasts—and Convergence?” in Jennings, , ed., Intellectuals in Twentieth-Century France, pp. 200–204Google Scholar.

42 T. W. Heyck, Transformation of Intellectual Life in Victorian England, throughout. For thoughtful essays that express some reservations about my findings, see Peter Allen, “The Meanings of ‘An Intellectual’”; and Hickox, “Has There Been a British Intellegentsia?”

43 For a discussion of post-Christian culture, see Gilbert, Alan D., The Making of Post-Christian Britain (London, 1980)Google Scholar.

44 Pater, Walter, The Renaissance: Studies in Art and Poetry (1877; reprint, London, 1910), p. xiiiGoogle Scholar.

45 Pattison, Mark, “A Chapter of University History,” Macmillan's Magazine (August 1875), p. 308Google Scholar.

46 Heyck, , Transformation of Intellectual Life, pp. 234–36Google Scholar.

47 This definition is found in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th ed. (New York, 1910), 14:680Google Scholar, s.v. “Intellect.”

48 Ogilvie, John, The Imperial Dictionary of the English Language (1882–1883; new ed., revised and augmented by Annandale, Charles, London, 1885)Google Scholar.

49 Murray, James, ed., A New Dictionary on Historical Principles (Oxford, 1888)Google Scholar. For a fascinating discussion of how the Oxford English Dictionary definitions were arrived at by means of a survey of past and current literature, see Murray, K. M. Elisabeth, Caught in the Web of Words: James A. H. Murray and the Oxford Dictionary (New Haven, Conn., 1977)Google Scholar.

50 The Diary of Beatrice Webb, vol. 2, 1892–1905, pp. 128, 169, 193.

51 Russell, Bertrand, quoted by Kirk, Russell, “The American Intellectual: A Conservative View,” in de Huszar, George B., ed., The Intellectual: A Controversial Portrait (Glencoe, Ill., 1960), p. 309Google Scholar.

52 Russell, Bertrand, “The Role of the Intellectual in the Modern World,” American Journal of Sociology 44 (January 1939): 493, 495CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 This meaning is set out by Collini, Stefan in “Intellectuals in Britain and France,” pp. 202–3Google Scholar.

54 The Diary of Beatrice Webb, vol. 1, 1873–1892, p. 164.

55 Forster, E. M., Howards End (1910; reprint, New York, 1921), p. 146Google Scholar.

56 Woolf, Virginia, The Diary of Virginia Woolf, ed. Bell, Anne Olivier, 5 vols. (New York, 1977–84), vol. 2, 1920–1924, p. 205Google Scholar. See also her review of Cannan's, GilbertMummery in The Essays of Virginia Woolf, ed. McNellie, Andrew, 3 vols. (London, 1986–1988), vol. 2, 1912–1918, p. 344Google Scholar.

57 Woolf, Virginia, A Room of One's Own (1929; reprint, New York, 1957), pp. 58–59, 113–15Google Scholar.

58 Benda, Julien, The Treason of the Intellectuals, trans. Aldington, Richard (London, 1928; reprint, New York, 1969)Google Scholar. Anonymous reviews appeared in the Times Literary Supplement (19 January 1928), p. 39Google Scholar, and (23 February 1928), p. 118.

59 For examples of each of these meanings, see, respectively, Connolly, Cyril, The Enemies of Promise (1938; rev. ed., New York, 1948), pp. 164–65Google Scholar; Koestler, Arthur, “The Intelligentsia,” Horizon (March 1944), p. 162Google Scholar; Pryce-Jones, , “Intellectuals at Sea” p. 26Google Scholar; Punch, Maurice, “Who Is the Intellectual When He's at Home?” New Society (12 November 1970), p. 860Google Scholar; Levin, Bernard, “Intellectuals: It's All in the Mind,” The Times (12 March 1976), p. 14Google Scholar.

60 For the notion of the clerisy, see Knights, Ben, The Idea of the Clerisy in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge, 1978)Google Scholar; and for sages, see Holloway, The Victorian Sage.

61 It has not replaced these older terms entirely even today. See, e.g., Gransden, K. W., “Modern Sages,” New Society (14 December 1972), pp. 641–43Google Scholar.

62 The Diary of Beatrice Webb, vol. 1, 1873–1892, p. 89.

63 Heppenstall, Rayner, “Natural History of the Intelligentsia,” Adelphi (November 1935), p. 94Google Scholar.

64 Laski, Harold, “The Duty of the Intellectual Now,” Harper's (December 1939), p. 70Google Scholar.

65 Joll, James, “On Being an Intellectual,” Twentieth Century (June 1955), p. 535Google Scholar.

66 Fitzgibbon, Constantine, “Gloom and Contempt,” Listener (12 October 1961), p. 543Google Scholar.

67 Nettl, Peter, “Are Intellectuals Obsolete?” Listener (16 May 1968), p. 627Google Scholar.

68 Crick, , “The Brains of Britain,” p. 10Google Scholar.

69 See Charle, Christophe, Naissance des “intellectuels”, 1880–1900 (Paris, 1990)Google Scholar; and Jennings, ed., Intellectuals in Twentieth-Century France.

70 SirLusington's, Godfrey letter summarizing the Dreyfus case to The Times (13 October 1898)Google Scholar is said to be the longest letter ever published by The Times—10,000 words. See Snyder, Louis L., The Dreyfus Case: A Documentary History (New Brunswick, N.J., 1973), pp. 228–52Google Scholar. For another account of the case that introduced the political concept of intellectuals, see “The Trial of M. Zola: Addresses to the Jury,” The Times (22 February 1898)Google Scholar.

71 For example, see “The Demoralization of France,” Contemporary Review (March 1898), pp. 305–25Google Scholar; Murray, David Christie, “Some Notes on the Zola Case,” Contemporary Review (April 1898), pp. 481–90Google Scholar; Huguenot, [Conybeare, Frederick C.], “The Truth about the Dreyfus Case,” National Review (June 1898), pp. 541–58Google Scholar; and Maxse, L. J., “The Military Terror in France,” National Review (July 1898), pp. 745–56Google Scholar.

72 The Diary of Beatrice Webb, vol. 3, 1905–1924, p. 291.

73 Tawney, R. H., The Acquisitive Society, and Equality, 2d ed. (London, 1931)Google Scholar. See also Terrill, Ross, R. H. Tawney and His Times: Socialism and Fellowship (Cambridge, Mass., 1973), esp. pp. 32–35, 53, 150, and 175Google Scholar; and Meacham, Standish, Toynbee Hall and Social Reform, 1880–1914 (New Haven, Conn., 1987)Google Scholar, chap. 7.

74 The Diary of Beatrice Webb, vol. 3, 1905–1924, pp. 248, 251, 303, 326.

75 See Clarke, Peter, Liberals and Social Democrats (Cambridge, 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, throughout.

76 See Cole, Margaret, Growing Up into Revolution (London, 1949), pp. 86–88Google Scholar; Carpenter, L. P., G. D. H. Cole: An Intellectual Biography (Cambridge, 1973), pp. 91–95Google Scholar; The Diary of Beatrice Webb, vol. 3, 1905–1924, pp. 241, 326; and Ree, Jonathan, Proletarian Philosophers: Problems in Socialist Culture in Britain, 1900–1940 (Oxford, 1984), pp. 46–47Google Scholar.

77 Wood, Neal, Communism and British Intellectuals (New York, 1959), chap. 1, esp. pp. 21–23Google Scholar.

78 Hynes, Samuel, The Auden Generation: Literature and Politics in England in the 1930s (London, 1976), chaps. 3, 4Google Scholar.

79 Roberts, Michael, “Preface,” in his anthology of poetry, New Country (London, 1933), p. 15Google Scholar.

80 Ibid., p. 232.

81 Freda Utley, quoted in Ree, , Proletarian Philosophers, pp. 88–89Google Scholar.

82 Palme Dutt, quoted in ibid., pp. 89–90; emphasis in the original. See also Wood, , Communism and British Intellectuals, pp. 168–73Google Scholar.

83 Bell, , ed., The Diary of Virginia Woolf, vol. 1, 1915–19, p. 218Google Scholar.

84 Wells, H. G., Journalism and Prophecy, 1893–1946 (1923; reprint, Boston, 1964), pp. 172–74Google Scholar.

85 Jones, D. A. N., “The Talking Heads—a Guided Tour of Our Intellectual Network,” Sunday Times Magazine (19 May 1968), pp. 22 ff.Google Scholar

86 Tawney, , The Acquisitive Society, pp. 126–127Google Scholar, and esp. chap. 10, “The Position of the Brain Worker.”

87 Fyvel, T. R., Intellectuals Today: Problems of a Changing Society (New York, 1968), p. 16Google Scholar.

88 Cowling, Maurice, “Intellectuals and the Tory Party,” Spectator (8 March 1968), pp. 292–93Google Scholar.

89 Beloff, Max, “The Americanization of British Intellectual Life,” Listener (14 September 1967), p. 327Google Scholar.

90 For discussions of the origins and meanings of “intelligentsia,” see Pipes, Richard, “The Historical Evolution of the Russian Intelligentsia,” in The Russian Intelligentsia, ed. Pipes, Richard (New York, 1961), pp. 47–62Google Scholar.

91 C. D., , “Science and the Public,” New Statesman (15 July 1916), p. 348Google Scholar.

92 Woolf, Virginia, “Cleverness and Youth,” in The Essays of Virginia Woolf, vol. 3, 1919–1924, p. 176Google Scholar.

93 See, e.g., Orwell's, “Antisemitism in Britain,” p. 291Google Scholar.

94 See, e.g., Berlin, Isaiah, “The Role of the Intellegensia,” Listener (16 May 1968)Google Scholar; Hough, Graham, “In Dark Times,” Listener (23 May 1968), p. 662Google Scholar; Davie, Donald, “On Hobbits and Intellectuals,” Encounter (October 1969), pp. 87–92Google Scholar.

95 Fyvel considered the word “intelligentsia” identical to the word “intellectuals,” and he used it to refer to the whole stratum of professional and technocratic people in Intellectuals Today (see p. 20). See also Nettl, Peter, “Are Intellectuals Obsolete?” Listener (16 May 1968), p. 628Google Scholar; and Manvell, Roger, “The Treason of the Intellectuals,” Humanist (August 1971), pp. 240–42Google Scholar.

96 For cultural trends in Britain during the cold war, see Hewison, Robert, In Anger: British Culture in the Cold War, 1945–1960 (New York, 1981), esp. chap. 1Google Scholar; and Sinfield, Alan, Literature, Politics, and Culture in Postwar Britain (Berkeley, Calif, 1989), esp. chap. 6Google Scholar.

97 It might be noted that, in the Thatcher era, right-wing intellectuals were integrated with the ruling party, while left-wing intellectuals were regarded as separate. Hence Mrs. Thatcher's party managed to be anti-intellectual and antiacademic at the same time it drew on the work of conservative academic economists.

98 Anderson, Perry, “Origins of the Present Crisis,” New Left Review (January–February 1964), pp. 26–54Google Scholar, esp. p. 42. See also Nairn, Tom, “The English Working Class,” New Left Review (March-April 1964), pp. 43–57Google Scholar, “The Nature of the Labour Party—I,” New Left Review (September-October 1964), pp. 38–65Google Scholar, and “The Nature of the Labour Party—II,” New Left Review (November-December 1964), pp. 32–62Google Scholar.

99 Thompson, E. P., “The Peculiarities of the English,” The Socialist Register (London, 1965), pp. 311–62Google Scholar.

100 Bradbury, Malcolm, “Uncertainties of the British Intellectual,” New Society (24 December 1964), pp. 7–9Google Scholar. Fyvel took much the same point of view, without Bradbury's analytical acuity, in Intellectuals Today.

101 Nettl, , “Are Intellectuals Obsolete?” pp. 627–29Google Scholar.

102 Hough, , “In Dark Times,” pp. 661–63Google Scholar, esp p. 662. The American Noam Chomsky made a similar point in “The Welfare/Warfare Intellectuals,” New Society (3 July 1969), pp. 12–16Google Scholar.

103 Hawthorn, Geoffrey, “The New Intelligentsia in Britain,” New Society (28 October 1976), pp. 183–86Google Scholar, esp. p. 184.

104 Harvey, A. D., “The Alienated Intellectual Today: Educating for Extremism,” Encounter (December 1976), pp. 51–55Google Scholar, esp. p. 55. See also Martin, David, ed., Anarchy and Culture: The Problem of the Contemporary University (London, 1969)Google Scholar; and Carswell, John, Government and the Universities: Programme and Performance, 1960–1980 (Cambridge, 1985)Google Scholar, esp. chap. 10, “Student Power.” For a dissenting interpretation of radical intellectuals, see Hobsbawm, E. J., “The New Dissent: Intellectuals, Society and the Left,” New Society (23 November 1978), pp. 443–45Google Scholar.

105 See, e.g., Hall, J. A., “The Roles and Influence of Political Intellectuals: Tawney vs. Sidney Webb,” British Journal of Sociology 28, no. 3 (1977): 351–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar, “The Curious Case of the English Intelligentsia,” British Journal of Sociology 30, no. 3 (1979): 291–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Crick, , “The Brains of Britain,” p. 10Google Scholar; Williams, Raymond, “Intellectuals behind the Screens,” Times Higher Education Supplement (23 January 1983), p. 11Google Scholar; Halsey, A. H., “In a Class of Their Own?” Times Higher Education Supplement (28 January 1983), p. 13Google Scholar; Eichler, Udi, “Where Have All the Thinkers Gone? Intellectuals on British Television,” Listener (16 February 1984), pp. 10, 12, 16Google Scholar.

106 Williams, Raymond, Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society (New York, 1976), p. 142Google Scholar.

107 Ascherson, Neal, “England Needs Its Intellectuals,” Observer (11 August 1985), p. 7Google Scholar.

108 Annan, Our Age; Maclean, Ian, Montefiore, Alan, and Winch, Peter, eds., The Political Responsibility of Intellectuals (Cambridge, 1990)Google Scholar; Collini, Public Moralists; Carey, The Intellectuals and the Masses; and Jennings, Intellectuals in Twentieth-Century France. Johnson, Paul, Intellectuals (New York, 1988)Google Scholar, an unbalanced attack on the wickedness of certain intellectuals, shows that the old anti-intellectualism of British intellectuals is not dead yet.