Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:43:07.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Avarice” and “Evil Doers”: Profiteers, Politicians, and Popular Fiction in the 1920s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2012

Christine Grandy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 667 - 689
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Robert, Jean-Louis, “The Image of the Profiteer,” Capital Cities at War: Paris, London, Berlin, 1914–1919, vol. 1, ed. Winter, Jay and Robert, Jean-Louis (Cambridge, 1997), 104–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Fussell, Paul, The Great War and Modern Memory (1975; Oxford, 2000)Google Scholar; Hynes, Samuel, A War Imagined: The First World War and English Culture (London, 1990)Google Scholar; Kent, Susan Kingsley, Making Peace: The Reconstruction of Gender in Interwar Britain (Princeton, NJ, 1993)Google Scholar; Watson, Janet S. K., Fighting Different Wars: Experience, Memory, and the First World War in Britain (Cambridge, 2004)Google Scholar; Winter, Jay, Sites of Memory, Sites of Mourning: The Great War in European Cultural History (Cambridge, 1995).Google Scholar

3 Dawson, Graham, Soldier Heroes: British Adventure, Empire and the Imagining of Masculinities (London, 1994)Google Scholar; Jones, Max, “What Should Historians Do with Heroes? Reflections on Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Britain,” History Compass 5, no. 2 (January 2007): 439–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Finn, Margot C., The Character of Credit: Personal Debt in English Culture, 1740–1914 (Cambridge, 2003)Google Scholar; McVeagh, John, Tradeful Merchants: The Portrayal of the Capitalist in Literature (London, 1981)Google Scholar; Michie, Ronald C., Guilty Money: The City of London in Victorian and Edwardian Culture, 1815–1914 (London, 2009)Google Scholar; Poovey, Mary, Genres of the Credit Economy: Mediating Value in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Britain (Chicago, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stern, Rebecca, Home Economics: Domestic Fraud in Victorian England (Columbus, OH, 2008)Google Scholar; Taylor, James, Creating Capitalism: Joint Stock Enterprise in British Politics and Culture, 1800–1870 (Woodbridge, 2006).Google Scholar

5 McVeagh, Tradeful Merchants, 149.

6 Contrary to misuse by many, “best seller” as a term did not exist prior to this period. See Melman, Billie, Women and the Popular Imagination in the Twenties: Flappers and Nymphs (New York, 1988), 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Bloom, Clive, Bestsellers: Popular Fiction since 1900 New York, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McAleer, Joseph, Popular Reading and Publishing in Britain, 1914–1950 Oxford, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 See Bailey’s, Peter“White Collars, Gray Lives? The Lower Middle Class Revisited,” Journal of British Studies 38, no. 3 (July 1999): 273–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Leavis, , Fiction and the Reading Public London, 1932), 26.Google Scholar

10 Ibid., 70.

11 Meyers, Jessica, “The Tuition of Manhood: ‘Sapper’s’ War Stories and the Literature of War,” Publishing in the First World War: Essays in Book History, ed. Hammond, Mary and Towheed, ShafquatLondon, 2007), 113–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Matt Houlbrook’s research into literary con-man Netley Lucas provides a bridge between high and low culture through the role of a real-life villain; Matt Houlbrook, “Fashioning an Ex-Crook: Self, Citizenship, and Criminality in the Work of Netley Lucas” (paper presented at the annual conference of the Social History Society, 2008).

13 John, Juliet, Dickens’s Villains: Melodrama, Character, Popular Culture Oxford, 2001), 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 McAleer, Joseph, Passion’s Fortune: The Story of Mills & Boon Oxford, 1999), 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Bloom notes that Oppenheim had a ledger to himself at Stodder & Houghton; Bloom, Clive, “Introduction” in Literature and Culture in Modern Britain, Volume One: 1900–1929, ed. Bloom, CliveLondon, 1993), 16.Google Scholar

16 Kent, Making Peace.

17 Humble, Nicola, The Feminine Middlebrow Novel, 1920s to 1950s: Class, Domesticity, and Bohemianism Oxford, 2001)Google Scholar; Ingman, Heather, Women’s Fiction between the Wars: Mothers, Daughters, and Writing New York, 1998)Google Scholar; Light, Alison, Forever England: Femininity, Literature and Conservatism Between the Wars London, 1991)Google Scholar.

18 Philip Gibbs, Michael Arlen, and A. S. M. Hutchinson all worked as journalists. Gibbs was an accredited war correspondent during World War I. Most of the authors received some form of education either at a college or, in Deeping’s case, during a short stint at the University of Cambridge. All were dependent upon employment, but not that which defined the working class. See entries in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography: In Association with the British Academy, from the Earliest Times to the Year 2000, ed. Matthew, H. C. G. and Harrison, Brian, 62 vols. Oxford, 2004)Google Scholar.

19 Horkheimer, Max and Adorno, Theodor W., Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, trans. Jephcott, Edmund (Stanford, CA, 1947; repr., 2002).Google Scholar

20 See Dawson, Soldier Heroes, as well as Jordan, Gerald and Rogers, Nicholas, “Admirals as Heroes: Patriotism and Liberty in Hanoverian England,” Journal of British Studies 28, no. 3 (July 1989): 201–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Wilkinson, Glenn R., Depictions and Images of War in Edwardian Newspapers, 1899–1914 New York, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Graves, Robert and Hodge, Alan, The Long Weekend: A Social History of Great Britain, 1918–1939 Middlesex, 1940), 10Google Scholar. The centrality of the combatant hero is evident even within exotic novels like Hull’s, E. M.The Sheik (1919; Boston, 1921)Google Scholar. In The Sheik, the hero Ahmed’s revelation that he is an Englishman legitimizes his suitability as Diana Mayo’s love interest, yet it is his consistent role as an adept fighter and leader of his men that demonstrates this up to that point.

22 Gullace, Nicoletta, “White Feathers and Wounded Men: Female Patriotism and the Memory of the Great War,” Journal of British Studies 36, no. 2 (April 1997): 178–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 See Gullace, Nicoletta, “The Blood of Our Sons”: Men, Women, and the Renegotiation of British Citizenship During the Great War New York, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 John Buchan even makes reference to the disturbingly “round” head of its villain Medina in Three Hostages (1924). See Buchan, John, “The Three Hostages,” in The Complete Richard Hannay (1924; London, 1992), 757Google Scholar. On the bodies of men, see Zweiniger-Bargielowska, Ina, “The Culture of the Abdomen: Obesity and Reducing in Britain, circa 1900–1939,” Journal of British Studies 44 (April 2005): 245CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bourke, Joanna, Dismembering the Male: Men’s Bodies, Britain, and the Great War Chicago, 1996)Google Scholar.

25 Hutchinson, A. S. M., If Winter Comes Toronto, 1921), 53.Google Scholar

26 Ibid.

27 “Thrilling New ‘Sapper’ Story,” Daily Mail, 20 January 1926.

28 McNeile, H. C., Bulldog Drummond, (1920; New York, 1934), 9.Google Scholar

29 Deeping, Warwick, Sorrell and Son New York, 1925), 5.Google Scholar

30 Deeping, , Old Pybus New York, 1928), 4–5.Google Scholar

31 Ibid., 17.

32 Ibid.

33 Bennett, Arnold, Lord Raingo New York, 1926), 12.Google Scholar

34 Ibid., 227.

35 Ibid., 282.

36 “Fighting the Trusts: The Profiteering Act; Mr. McCurdy’s Warning,” The Times, 16 September 1919.

37 Tea, butter, and margarine were also rationed.

38 Stevenson, John, British Society, 1914–45 London, 1984), 72–74.Google Scholar

39 Clynes, J. R., “Food Control in War and Peace,” Economic Journal 30, no. 118 (1920): 147–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40 Doyle, A. C.. “Profiteering: Where the Guilt Lies; The Middlemen’s Gains,” The Times, 9 July 1919.Google Scholar

41 “War Profits,” Daily Express, 11 October 1919.

42 Beaverbrook, Lord, “Tax War Profits: A Just Method to Meet Our Desperate Needs; More than £1,000,000,000,” Daily Express, 21 October 1919.Google Scholar

43 On the capital levy see Daunton, M. J., “How to Pay for the War: State, Society and Taxation in Britain, 1917–24,” English Historical Review 111, no. 443 (September 1996): 882–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

44 The Profiteering Act, 1919, Fully Annotated London, 1919), vii.Google Scholar

45 M. J. Daunton, “How to Pay for the War”; N. Rollings, “Whitehall and the Control of Prices and Profits in a Major War, 1919–1939”; MacLachlan, Patricia and Trentmann, Frank, “Civilizing Markets: Traditions of Consumer Politics in Twentieth-Century Britain, Japan and the United States,” Markets in Historical Contexts: Ideas and Politics in the Modern World, ed. Bevir, Mark and Trentmann, FrankCambridge, 2004), 170–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

46 “Profiteering Act ‘Useless’: Labour Members Resign at Liverpool,” The Times, 4 March 1920.

47 “Profiteering Act to be Retained: Fair Price Agreement,” The Times, 23 April 1920, and “Profiteering Bill through Committee,” The Times, 13 May 1920.

48 M. C. Finn, “The Character of Credit”; J. McVeagh, “Tradeful Merchants.”

49 Oppenheim, E. Phillips, The Profiteers Boston, 1921), 8.Google Scholar

50 Ibid., 66.

51 Ibid., 161.

52 Ibid.

53 “Thrilling New ‘Sapper’ Story” Daily Mail, 20 January 1926, 14.

54 Board of Trade Profiteering Act Department files BT 68/69 (1920).

55 “Profiteering Act: Traders Uneasy and Public Hopeful. Street Markets,” The Times, 22 September 1919.

56 Graves, The Long Weekend, 10.

57 Morris, A. J. A., “Bottomley, Horatio William (1860–1933),” in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography.Google Scholar

58 Arlen, Michael, The Green Hat: A Romance for a Few People London, 1924), 15.Google Scholar

59 Morgan, K., Consensus and Disunity: The Lloyd George Coalition Government, 1918–1922 Oxford, 1979), 339–42.Google Scholar

60 Cregier, D. M., “Robinson, Sir Joseph Benjamin, First Baronet (1840–1929),” in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography.Google Scholar

61 Morgan, Consensus and Disunity, 339–42.

62 Broadberry, Stephen and Howlett, Peter, “The United Kingdom during World War I: Business as Usual?” in The Economics of World War I, ed. Broadberry, StephenCambridge, 2005), 206–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McDermott, John, “‘A Needless Sacrifice’: British Businessmen and Business as Usual in the First World War,” Albion 21, no. 2 (1989): 263–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 See “Businessmen, Industrialists, and Bankers: How Was the Economic War Waged?” in Winter, Jay and Prost, Antoine, The Great War in History: Debates and Controversies, 1914 to the Present Cambridge, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Cronier, Emmanuelle, “The Street,” in Capital Cities at War: Paris, London, Berlin, 1914–1919, vol. 2, ed. Winter, Jay and Robert, Jean-LouisCambridge, 2007), 57–104.Google Scholar

65 Oppenheim, The Profiteers, 32.

66 Ibid., 156.

67 Ibid., 162.

68 Ibid., 280.

69 Bennett, Lord Raingo, 47.

70 Ibid., 70.

71 Ibid., 55.

72 McNeile, Bulldog Drummond, 233.

73 Ibid., 237.

74 McKibbin, Ross, “Class and Conventional Wisdom in Interwar Britain,” in Ideologies of Class: Social Relations in Britain, 1880–1950 Oxford, 1990), 259–93.Google Scholar

75 McKibbin notes that about 57 percent of Conservative MPs had been “in the armed forces, the civil service, or the professions” (“Class and Conventional Wisdom in Interwar Britain,” 268).

76 Gibbs, Philip, The Middle of the Road New York, 1923), 48.Google Scholar

77 Gibbs, Philip, Young Anarchy New York, 1926), 203–4.Google Scholar

78 “Control of Prices: New Powers against Profiteering; House of Commons,” The Times, 20 June 1941. The Times noted that this was not contested, nor was “the principle” of the bill.

79 Fielding, Steven, “What Did ‘the People’ Want? The Meaning of the 1945 General Election,” Historical Journal 35, no. 3 (September 1992): 623–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar