Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:45:39.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Socioeconomic status and fertility in rural Bangladesh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

K. Shaikh  and
S. Becker
K. Shaikh
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
S. Becker
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Using a unique set of birth registration data from the Demographic Surveillance System of the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, for the period 1974–77, and socioeconomic information collected in the 1974 census, fertility was studied in relation to occupation, size of dwelling, number of cows and number of boats owned. The total fertility rate was found to vary between 6 and 6·5 except in the famine year of 1975. There was no consistent relationship between fertility and education of women. Fertility differentials by occupation showed that the household heads who were farm labourers had relatively lower fertility compared to other occupational groups, except for the year 1977 where the families of service holders were found to have relatively lower fertility. There was a consistent direct relationship between the dwelling size and fertility for each of the years.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 1985 , pp. 81 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © 1985, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aziz, K.M.A. (1979) Kinship in Bangladesh. International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka.Google Scholar
Chen, L.C., Ahmed, S., Gheshe, M. & Mosley, W.H. (1974) A prospective study of birth interval dynamics in rural Bangladesh. Popul. Stud. 28, 277.Google ScholarPubMed
Chowdhury, R.H. (1977) Education and fertility in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Dev. Stud. 5, 81.Google Scholar
Cholera Research Laboratory (1979) Demographic Surveillance System. Vol. 1, Methods and Procedures. Scientific Report No. 9. Cholera Research Laboratory, Dhaka.Google Scholar
Davis, K. & Blake, J. (1956) Social structure and fertility: an analytic framework. Econ. Dev. cult. Change, 4, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duza, B. (1967) Differential fertility in Pakistan. In: Studies in the Demography of Pakistan. Edited by Robinson, W.C.. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Karachi.Google Scholar
Islam, M.S. & Becker, S. (1979) Interrelationships among certain socioeconomic variables in a rural population of Bangladesh. Rural Dem. 6, 51.Google Scholar
Rahman, M., Mosley, W.H., Khan, A.R., Chowdhury, A. I. & Chakrabarty, J. (1979) The Matlab Contraceptive Distribution Project. Series B, Report No. 32. International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka.Google Scholar
Ruzicka, L.T. & Chowdhury, A.K.M.A. (1978a) Demographic Surveillance System—Matlab, Vol. 2. Census 1974. Scientific Report No. 10. International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka.Google Scholar
Ruzicka, L.T. & Chowdhury, A.K.M.A. (1978b) Demographic Surveillance System—Matlab, Vol. 5, Vital Events, Migration and Marriages—1976. Scientific Report No. 11. International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka.Google Scholar
Ruzicka, L.T. & Chowdhury, A.K.M.A. (1978c) Demographic Surveillance System, Vol. 4, Vital Events and Migration. Scientific Report No. 12. International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka.Google Scholar
Stoeckel, J. & Chowdhury, A.K.M.A. (1979) Fertility and Socioeconomic Status in Rural Bangladesh: Differentials and Linkages. International Programmes Working Paper No. 8. Population Council, New York.Google Scholar
Stoeckel, J. & Chowdhury, M.A. (1969) Differential fertility in a rural area of East Pakistan. Milbank meml Fund q. Bull. 47, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar