Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:22:35.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SOCIOECONOMIC, DEMOGRAPHIC AND LEGAL INFLUENCES ON CONSANGUINITY AND KINSHIP IN NORTHERN COASTAL SWEDEN 1780–1899

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2011

I. EGERBLADH  and
A. H. BITTLES
I. EGERBLADH
Affiliation:
Centre for Population Studies, Demographic DataBase, Umeå University, Sweden
A. H. BITTLES
Affiliation:
Centre for Comparative Genomics, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Most studies on consanguinity have been conducted on contemporary populations and have focused on the prevalence and types of preferred intra-familial marriage. With its comprehensive birth, marriage and deaths records dating back to the late 17th century, and the legal bar on first cousin marriage removed in the mid-19th century, Sweden offers unique opportunities to examine the factors that determine by whom, where and why consanguineous marriages were contracted. The present study covers the period 1780–1899 and presents a detailed portrait of cousin and sibling exchange marriages in the Skellefteå region of northern coastal Sweden. The combined prevalence of first, second and third cousin marriage increased from 2.3% in 1790–1810 to 8.8% in 1880–1899, and multi-generation consanguinity also increased significantly over the study period. The distribution and prevalence of first cousin marriages was strikingly non-random, with a significantly greater propensity for consanguinity among land-owning families, especially involving first-born sons, within specific pedigrees, and in a number of more remote inland communities. Additional factors associated with a greater likelihood of consanguineous marriage included physical or mental disability among males, and among females the prior birth of an illegitimate child. Besides the inherent interest in the social and demographic structure of this region of northern Sweden during the course of the 19th century, in future studies it will be important to determine the degree to which the observed patterns of consanguineous and sibling exchange marriages in these past generations could have influenced present-day genetic structure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , July 2011 , pp. 413 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almquist, J. E. (1953) Strödda bidrag till civilrättens historia. Kungl, Boktryckeriet P.A. Norstedt & Söner, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Alm-Stenflo, G. (1994) Demographic Descriptions of the Skellefteå and Sundsvall Regions during the 19th Century. Information from the Demographic DataBase, Umeå University.Google Scholar
Alström, C. A. (1958) First-cousin marriages in Sweden 1750–1844 and a study of the population movement in some Swedish subpopulations from the genetic-statistical viewpoint. Acta Genetica et Statistica Medica 8, 295–369.Google Scholar
Axell-Bonow, M. (2005) Gård, gräns, giftermål. Familjestrategiers betydelse för marken och landskapets utformning i Norra Åsarps socken, Västergötland ca 1640–1880. Meddelanden nr 135, Kulturgeografiska institutionen, Stockholms Universitet.Google Scholar
Bittles, A. H. (1994) The role and significance of consanguinity as a demographic variable. Population and Development Review 20, 561–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bittles, A. H. (2001) Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clinical Genetics 60, 89–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H. (2002) Endogamy, consanguinity and community genetics. Journal of Genetics 81, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H. (2003) The bases of Western attitudes to consanguineous marriage. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 45, 135–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H. (2008) A community genetics perspective on consanguineous marriage. Community Genetics 11, 324–330.Google ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H. (2009) Commentary: the background and outcomes of the first-cousin marriage controversy in Great Britain. International Journal of Epidemiology 38, 1453–1458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H. & Black, M. L. (2010a) Consanguineous marriage and human evolution. Annual Review of Anthropology 39, 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bittles, A. H. & Black, M. L. (2010b) Consanguinity, human evolution and complex diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107, 1779–1786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H. & Hamamy, H. (2010) Endogamy and consanguineous marriage in Arab populations. In Teebi, A. (ed.) Genetic Disorders among Arab Populations, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bittles, A. H. & Egerbladh, I. (2005) The influence of past endogamy and consanguinity on genetic disorders in northern Sweden. Annals of Human Genetics 69, 549–558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittles, A. H., Grant, J. C., Sullivan, S. G. & Hussain, R. (2002) Does inbreeding lead to decreased human fertility? Annals of Human Biology 29, 111–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Böök, J. A. (1948) The frequency of cousin marriages in three North Swedish parishes. Hereditas 34, 252–255.Google Scholar
Böök, J. A. & Måwe, C. E. (1955) The incidence of cousin marriage in a west-Swedish rural community. American Journal of Human Genetics 7, 426–429.Google Scholar
Brändström, A. (1996) Life histories of single parents and illegitimate infants in nineteenth-century Sweden. The History of the Family 1, 205–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brändström, A. (2001) Partnerval och kulturella gränser. Giftermålsmönstret i Skelleftebygden 1720–1900. Kulturens frontlinjer 19, 7–38.Google Scholar
Brändström, A., Edvinsson, S. & Rogers, J. (2002) Illegitimacy, infant feeding practices and infant survival in Sweden 1750–1950. A regional analysis. Hygiea Internationalis 3, 13–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bras, H., van Poppel, F. & Mandemakers, K. (2009) Relatives as spouses: preferences and opportunities for kin marriage in a Western society. American Journal of Human Biology 21, 793–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Moroni, A. & Zei, G. (2004) Consanguinity, Inbreeding and Genetic Drift in Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Egerbladh, I. (1995) Flyttningar på landsbygden i 1800-talest Norrland. In Layton, I. (ed.) Då, nu och sedan. Kungl. Skytteanska Samfundets handlingar, 44. Umeå, pp. 19–30.Google Scholar
Egerbladh, I. & Bittles, A. H. (2008) The influence of consanguineous marriage on reproductive behaviour and early mortality in Skellefteå, Sweden, 1780–1899. In Mineau, G. & Bengtsson, T. (eds) A New History of Kinship. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 220–244.Google Scholar
Fraccaro, M. (1958) The incidence of consanguineous marriages in Sweden. Hereditas 44, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frykman, J. (1975) Sexual intercourse and social norms. A study of illegitimate births in Sweden 1831–1933. Ethnologia Scandinavica, 110–150.Google Scholar
Frykman, J. (1977) Horan i bondesamhället [The whore in peasant societies]. Liber, Lund.Google Scholar
Gaunt, D. (1983) Familjeliv i Norden. Gidlund, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Goody, J. (1983) The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Göransson, A. (1990) Kön, släkt och ägande. Borgerliga maktstrategier 1800–1850. Historisk Tidskrift 4, 525–544.Google Scholar
Hajnal, J. (1965) European marriage patterns in perspective. In Glass, D. V. & Eversley, D. E. C. (eds) Population in History. Edward Arnold, London, pp. 101–143.Google Scholar
Hussain, R. (1999) Community perceptions of reasons for preference for consanguineous marriage in Pakistan. Journal of Biosocial Science 31, 449–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hussain, R. & Bittles, A. H. (1998) The prevalence and demographic characteristics of consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. Journal of Biosocial Science 30, 261–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inger, G. (1983) Svensk rättshistoria. Liber Förlag, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Karlsson, A. O., Wallerström, T., Götherström, A. & Holmlund, G. (2006) Y-chromosome diversity in Sweden – a long-time perspective. European Journal of Human Genetics 14, 963–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larson, C. A. (1956) The frequency of first cousin marriages in a South Swedish rural community. American Journal of Human Genetics 8, 151–153.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, Cronberg M. (1997) Synd och skam. Ogifta mödrar på svensk landsbygd 1680–1880. Dissertation, Historiska Institutionen, Lunds Universitet, Lund.Google Scholar
Mosk, C. (1983) Patriarchy and Fertility: Japan and Sweden 1880–1960. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Protocols of the Swedish Riksdag 1809–1810, 1828–1829, 1840–41, 1844–45 Tabellverket and Popum DataBases, Demographic Database, Umeå University, Sweden.Google Scholar
Sabean, D. W. (1990) Property, Family and Inheritance in Neckarhausen, 1800–1870. Cambridge University Studies. Cambridge Studies in Social Anthropology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sporrong, U. & Wennersten, E. (1995) Marken, gården, släkten och arvet. Leksands sockenbeskrivning del X. Solna.Google Scholar
Strömholm, S. (1981) An Introduction to Swedish Law. Norstedt, Stockholm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wennersten, E. (2002) Släktens territorier. En jämförande studie av sociala regelverk i det förindustriella bondesamhället i Dalarna och Hälsingland 1734-1826. Meddelanden nr 112, Kulturgeografiska Institutionen, Stockholms Universitet.Google Scholar
Westerlund, E. (1973) Skelleftebygdens Historia, del 1. Uppsala.Google Scholar