Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T14:57:02.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SEX RATIO AT BIRTH IN TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY GREECE: THE ROLE OF ETHNIC AND SOCIAL GROUPS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2014

V. GAVALAS ,
K. RONTOS  and
N. NAGOPOULOS
V. GAVALAS*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of the Aegean, Lesvos, Greece
K. RONTOS
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of the Aegean, Lesvos, Greece
N. NAGOPOULOS
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of the Aegean, Lesvos, Greece
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The number of male per 100 female live births (defined as the sex ratio at birth, SRB) has been shown to be consistently stable in human populations irrespective of time and geographical location. All over the globe approximately 105 boys are born for every 100 girls and any significant deviation from this ‘global average’ is considered to be unnatural and is attributed to sex-selective under-reporting of births, sex-selective abortion, sex-selective infanticide or other man-made factors. The present paper uses data on civil registration from 2004–2011 to investigate the sex ratio at birth in modern Greece. It was found that the SRB is extremely masculine when the parents originate from the Indian sub-continent and China. The SRB is also unnaturally high (more than 113 boys per 100 girls) in the case of legitimate births born to Greek mothers who are illiterate. These findings are strong evidence that sex-selective abortions are taking place in Greece within population groups with a certain ethnic and social profile. Other parameters, such as age of mother at birth, birth order, legal status of birth and geographical location, were also investigated and they were found to play a role in the variation of SRB, but not to the extent education and ethnic group do.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , May 2015 , pp. 363 - 375
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chahnazarian, A. (1988) Determinants of the sex ratio at birth: review of recent literature. Biodemography and Social Biology 35 (3–4), 214–235.Google Scholar
English.news.cn (2013) China's sex ratio at birth declines 4 years in a row. URL: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013-03/05/c_132209268.htmGoogle Scholar
Erickson, D. (1976) The secondary sex ratio in the United States 1969–1971: association with race, parental ages, birth order, paternal education and legitimacy. Annals of Human Genetics 40, 205–212.Google Scholar
Healey, J. (1996) Statistics: A Tool for Social Research. Wandsworth Publishing Company, London.Google Scholar
James, W. (1980) Gonadotrophin and the human secondary sex ratio. British Medical Journal 281, 711–712.Google Scholar
James, W. (1987) The human sex ratio. Part 1: a review of the literature. Human Biology 59(5), 721–752.Google Scholar
James, W. (1998) Was the widespread decline in sex ratios at birth caused by reproductive hazards? Human Reproduction 13(4), 1083–1084.Google Scholar
Jastrzebski, De. S. (1919) The sex ratio at birth. Eugenics Review 11(1), 7–16.Google Scholar
Lawrence, P. (1941) The sex ratio, fertility, and ancestral longevity. Quarterly Review of Biology 16(1), 35–79.Google Scholar
Markle, G. (1974) Sex ratio at birth: values, variance and some determinants. Demography 11(1), 131–142.Google Scholar
Park, C. & Cho, N-H. (1995) Consequences of son preference in a low-fertility society: imbalance of the sex ratio at birth in Korea. Population and Development Review 21(1), 59–84.Google Scholar
Pergament, E., Todydemir, P. B. & Fiddler, M. (2002) Sex ratio: a biological perspective of ‘Sex and the City’. Reproductive BioMedical Online 5(1), 43–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pothitou, P. & Voutsa, D. (2008). Endocrine disrupting compounds in municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants in Northern Greece. Chemosphere 73, 1716–1723. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.09.037.Google Scholar
Sahni, M., Verma, N., Narula, D., Varghese, R. M., Sreenivas, V. & Puliyel, J. (2008) Missing girls in India: infanticide, feticide and made-to-order pregnancies? Insights from hospital-based sex-ratio-at-birth over the last century. PLoS One 3(5), e2224.Google Scholar
Stasinakis, A. S., Gatidou, G., Mamais, D., Thomaidis, N. S. & Lekkas, T. D. (2008) Occurrence and fate of endocrine disrupters in Greek sewage treatment plants. Water Research 42, 1796–1804.Google Scholar
Sudha, S. & Rajan, S. I. (1999) Female demographic disadvantage in India 1981–1991: sex selective abortions and female infanticide. Development and Change 30(3), 585–618.Google Scholar
Tarver, J. & Lee, C-F. (1968) Sex ratio of registered live births in the United States, 1942–43. Demography 5(1), 374–381.Google Scholar
Tragaki, A. & Lasaridi, K. (2009) Temporal and spatial trends in the sex ratio at birth in Greece, 1960–2006: exploring potential environmental factors. Population and Environment. 30, 114–118.Google Scholar
UNFPA (2011) Trends in Sex Ratio at Birth and Estimates of Girls Missing at Birth in India (2001–2008). United Nations Population Fund, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Veropoulou, G. & Tsimbos, C. (2010) Differentials in sex ratio at birth among natives and immigrants in Greece: an analysis employing nationwide microdata. Journal of Biosocial Science 42(3), 425–430.Google Scholar
Winston, S. (1931) The influence of social factors upon the sex-ratio at birth. American Journal of Sociology 37(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Yi, Z., Ping, T., Baochang, G., Yi, X., Bohua, L. & Yongpiing, L. (1993) Causes and implications of the recent increase in the reported sex ratio at birth in China. Population and Development Review 19(2), 283–302.Google Scholar