Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:33:27.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SEX DIFFERENCES IN INFANT MORTALITY IN SPITALFIELDS, LONDON, 1750–1839

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2011

LOUISE HUMPHREY ,
SILVIA BELLO  and
EMILY ROUSHAM
LOUISE HUMPHREY
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, London, UK
SILVIA BELLO
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, London, UK
EMILY ROUSHAM
Affiliation:
Centre for Global Health and Human Development, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This study examines sex differences in infant mortality in Spitalfields, London, and the estimated contribution of endogenous and exogenous factors to neonatal and infant mortality using the biometric model from 1750 to 1839. There was a marked decline in the risk of death during infancy and the neonatal period for both sexes during the study period. There was significant excess male infant mortality compared with that of females in the 1750–59 cohort, estimated from baptism and burial registers, but not in later cohorts. Similarly, males had higher neonatal mortality rates than females in 1750–59 but not in later cohorts. Biometric analyses suggest that the observed decrease in neonatal mortality in both sexes was caused by a reduction in both endogenous and exogenous causes of death. The contribution of maternal health and breast-feeding practices to the observed patterns of mortality is discussed in the light of available evidence.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 95 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bello, S. & Boëtsch, G. (2007) Naître en maison d'accouchement à Marseille au XXième siècle: prematurité et poids à la naissance. Biométrie Humaine et Anthropologie 25, 231–240.Google Scholar
Bello, S. M. & Humphrey, L. T. (2007) The funerary behaviour and the social value of children in a proto-industrial urban population from London during the 18th and 19th centuries. British Archaeological Review 1712, 24–31.Google Scholar
Bourgeois-Pichat, P. (1951) La mesure de la mortalité infantile. I. Principes et méthodes. Population 2, 233–248.Google Scholar
Davenport, R., Schwartz, L. & Boulton, J. (2011) The decline of adult smallpox in eighteenth-century London. Economic History Review DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2011.00599.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drevenstedt, G. L., Crimmins, E. M., Vasunilashorn, S. & Finch, C. E. (2008) The rise and fall of excess male infant mortality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 105, 5016–5021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, M. (1996) Life and Death in Spitalfields 1700 to 1850. Council for British Archaeology, York.Google Scholar
Fildes, V. A. (1988) The English wet-nurse and her role in infant care 1538–1800. Medical History 32, 142–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fildes, V. A. (1995) The culture and biology of breastfeeding: an historical review of Western Europe. In Stuart-Macadam, P. & Dettwyler, K. A. (eds) Breastfeeding: Biocultural Perspectives. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp. 101–126.Google Scholar
Finlay, R. (1981) Population and Metropolis: The Demography of London, 1580–1640. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galley, C. (2009) Infant mortality. Local Population Studies 82, 71–77.Google Scholar
Galley, C. & Shelton, N. (2001) Bridging the gap: determining long term changes in infant mortality in pre-registration England and Wales. Population Studies 55, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galley, C. & Woods, R. (1999) On the distribution of deaths during the first year of life. Population: An English Selection 11, 35–60.Google Scholar
Herring, D. A., Saunders, S. R. & Katzenberg, M. A. (1998) Investigating the weaning process in past populations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 105, 425–440.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howarth, W. J. (1905) The influence of feeding on the mortality of infants. Lancet 2, 210–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, L. T. (2008) Enamel traces of early lifetime events. In Schultkowski, H. (ed.) Between Biology and Culture. Cambridge University Press, pp. 186–206.Google Scholar
Ingemarsson, I. (2003) Gender aspects of preterm birth. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 110, 34–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katzenberg, M. A., Herring, A. & Saunders, S. R. (1996) Weaning and infant mortality: evaluating the skeletal evidence. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 39, 177–199.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khoury, M. J., Marks, J. S., McCarthy, B. J. & Zaro, S. M. (1985) Factors affecting the sex differential in neonatal mortality: the role of respiratory distress syndrome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 151, 777–782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knodel, J. & Kintner, H. (1977) The impact of breast feeding patterns on the biometric analysis of infant mortality. Demography 14, 391–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landers, J. (1990) Age patterns of mortality in London during the ‘Long Eighteenth Century’: a test of the ‘high potential’ model of metropolitan mortality. Social History of Medicine 3, 27–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landers, J. (1992) Historical epidemiology and the structural analysis of mortality. Health Transition Review 2, 47–75.Google Scholar
Landers, J. (1993) Death and the Metropolis: Studies in the Demographic History of London 1670–1830. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levene, A. (2005) The estimation of mortality at the London Foundling Hospital, 1741–99. Population Studies 59, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, M. & Gowland, R. (2007) Brief and precarious lives: infant mortality in contrasting sites from medieval and post-medieval England (AD 850–1859). American Journal of Physical Anthropology 134, 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
London, A. S. (1993) The impact of advances in medicine on the biometric analysis of infant mortality. Social Biology 40, 260–282.Google Scholar
Lynch, K. A., Greenhouse, J. B. & Brandstrom, A. (1998) Biometric modeling in the study of infant mortality – Evidence from 19th-century Sweden. Historical Methods 31, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maconochie, N. & Roman, E. (1997) Sex ratios: are there natural variations within the human population? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 104, 1050–1053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mage, D. T. & Donner, E. M. (2004) The fifty percent male excess of infant respiratory mortality. Acta Paediatrica 93, 1210–1215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Midi Berry, B. & Schofield, R. S. (1971) Age at baptism in pre-industrial England. Population Studies 25, 453–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molleson, T. & Cox, M. (1993) The Spitalfields Project, Volume 2. The Middling Sort. Council for British Archaeology Research Report 86.Google Scholar
Newton, G. (2011) Infant mortality variations, feeding practices and social status in London between 1550 and 1750. Social History of Medicine 24(2), 260–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitsch, et al. Using stable isotope analysis to examine the effect of economic change on breastfeeding practices in Spitalfields, London, UK. American Journal of Physical Anthropology (in press).Google Scholar
Reeve, J. & Adams, M. (1993) The Spitalfields Project, Volume 1. The Archaeology: Across the Styx. Council for British Archaeology Research Report 85.Google Scholar
Reid, A. (2002) Infant feeding and post-neonatal mortality in Derbyshire, England, in the early twentieth century. Population Studies 56, 151–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sawchuk, L. A., Herring, D. A. & Waks, L. R. (1985) Evidence of a Jewish advantage: a study of infant mortality in Gibraltar, 1870–1959. American Anthropologist 87, 616–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellekens, J. (2001) Economic change and infant mortality in England, 1580–1837. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 32, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, S. & Duncan, C. J. (1999) Malnutrition, pregnancy, and infant mortality: a biometric model. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 30, 37–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R. & Oepen, J. (2006) Place and status as determinants if infant mortality in England c.1550–1837. In Garrett, E., Galley, C., Shelton, N. & Woods, R. (eds) Infant Mortality: A Continuing Social Problem. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Hampshire, pp. 53–78.Google Scholar
Stevenson, D. K., Verter, J., Fanaroff, A. A., Oh, W., Ehrenkranz, R. A., Shankaran, S. et al. (2000) Sex differences in outcomes of very low birthweight infants: the newborn male disadvantage. Archives of Disease in Childhood 83, 182–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stinson, S. (1985) Sex differences in environmental sensitivity during growth and development. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 28, 12–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, I. (1983) Sex differences in human mortality: the role of genetic factors. Social Science & Medicine 17, 321–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldron, I. (1987) Patterns and causes of excess female mortality among children in developing countries. World Health Statistics Quarterly 40, 194–210.Google ScholarPubMed
WHO (2011) Statistics, Infant Deaths. URL: http://apps.who.int/whosis/database/mort/table2_process.cfm (accessed 20th January 2011).Google Scholar
Woods, R. (2006) Mortality in eighteenth-century London: a new look at the Bills. Local Population Studies 77, 12–23.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. (1977) Births and baptisms: the use of Anglican baptism registers as a source of information about the numbers of births in England before the beginning of civil registration. Population Studies 31, 281–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wrigley, E. A., Davies, R. S., Oeppen, J. E. & Schofield, R. S. (1997) English Population History from Family Reconstitution 1580–1837. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar