Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:45:43.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The rural ideal in American society and its influence on attitudes towards population limitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Larry D. Barnett
Larry D. Barnett
Affiliation:
California State College, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A prevalent feature of American society is the strong desire to live in areas of low population density and close to nature, a phenomenon which can perhaps be most appropriately termed a ‘rural ideal’.* It is paradoxical that this phenomenon has been little studied and totally disregarded in quantitative research, for it apparently has a long-standing and central place in American history (Schmitt, 1969; White & White, 1962). The ideal, which some would argue conforms to a basic biological need of the human species (e.g. Iltis, Loucks & Andrews, 1970), may help to explain and predict such social phenomena as migration to the suburbs (Schmitt, 1969; Strauss, 1961), the growth and prevalence of recreational activities which bring the individual into closer contact with nature and/or into lesser contact with other people (e.g. camping, fishing, hunting, visits to national parks) (Schmitt, 1969), and rising rates of deviant behaviours such as neuroses and violence with increasing population density (Ehrlich & Ehrlich, 1970).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , April 1972 , pp. 235 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Champion, D.J. (1970) Basic Statistics for Social Research. Chandler Publishing Company, Scranton, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P.R. & Ehrlich, A.H. (1970) Population, Resources, Environment. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Gold, D. (1969) Statistical tests and substantive significance. Am. Sociol. 4, 42Google Scholar
Goldstein, B. & Eichhorn, R.L. (1961) The changing Protestant ethic: rural patterns. Am. sociol. Rev. 26, 557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iltis, H.H., Loucks, O.L. & Andrews, P. (1970) Criteria for an optimum human environment. Bull. Atomic Scient. 26, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M. (1968) The Logic of Survey Analysis. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Schmitt, P.J. (1969) Back to Nature. Oxford Press, New York.Google Scholar
Strauss, A.L. (1961) Images of the American City. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Watt, K.E.F. (1969) Statement. Effects of Population Growth on National Resources and the Environment. Hearings Before A Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, Ninety-First Congress, First Session (September 15 and 16, 1969). US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
White, M. & White, L. (1962) The Intellectual Versus the City. Harvard University Press and the MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar