Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:24:45.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOW BIRTH WEIGHT AND SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS IN IRELAND

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2013

DAVID MADDEN
DAVID MADDEN*
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Ireland
*
1Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

There is now fairly substantial evidence of a socioeconomic gradient in low birth weight for developed countries. The standard summary statistic for this gradient is the concentration index. Using data from the recently published Growing Up in Ireland survey, this paper calculates this index for low birth weight arising from preterm and intrauterine growth retardation. It also carries out a decomposition of this index for the different sources of low birth weight and finds that income inequality appears to be less important for the case of preterm births, while father's education and local environmental conditions appear to be more relevant for intrauterine growth retardation. The application of the standard Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition also indicates that the socioeconomic gradient for low birth weight appears to arise owing to different characteristics between rich and poor, and not because the impact of any given characteristic on low birth weight differs between rich and poor.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , March 2014 , pp. 248 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, D. & Currie, J. (2011a) Human capital development before age five. Handbook of Labour Economics 4, 1315–1486.Google Scholar
Almond, D. & Currie, J. (2011b) Killing me softly: the fetal origins hypothesis. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25, 153–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, D. (1997) Maternal nutrition, fetal nutrition, and disease in later life. Nutrition 13, 807–813.Google Scholar
Black, S. E., Devereux, P. & Salvanes, K. (2007) From the cradle to the labour market? The effect of birthweight on adult outcomes. Quarterly Journal of Economics 122, 409–439.Google Scholar
Blinder, A. (1973) Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources 8, 436–455.Google Scholar
Bonzini, M., Coggon, D. & Palmer, K. (2007) Risk of prematurity, low birthweight and pre-eclampsia in relation to working hours and physical activity: a systematic review. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 64, 228–243.Google Scholar
Currie, J. (2009) Healthy, wealthy and wise: socioeconomic status, poor health in childhood and human capital development. Journal of Economic Literature 47, 87–122.Google Scholar
Currie, J. (2011) Inequality at Birth: Some Causes and Consequences. Mimeo, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Delaney, L., McGovern, M. & Smith, J. (2011) From Angela's Ashes to the Celtic Tiger: early life conditions and adult health in Ireland. Journal of Health Economics 30, 1–10.Google Scholar
Economic and Social Research Institute (2011) Perinatal Statistics Report, 2009. ESRI, Dublin.Google Scholar
Erreygers, G. (2009) Correcting the Concentration Index. Journal of Health Economics 28, 505–515.Google Scholar
Horton, N. & Kleinman, K. (2007) Much ado about nothing: a comparison of missing data methods and software to fit incomplete data regression models. American Statistician 61, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kakwani, N., Wagstaff, A. & Van Doorslaer, E. (1997) Socioeconomic inequalities in health: measurement, computation and statistical inference. Journal of Econometrics 77, 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koolman, X. & Van Doorslaer, E. (2004) On the interpretation of a concentration index of inequality. Health Economics 13, 649–656.Google Scholar
Kramer, M. S., Seguin, L., Lydon, J. & Goulet, L. (2000) Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so poorly? Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 14, 194–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAvoy, H., Sturley, J., Burke, S. & Balanda, K. (2006) Unequal at Birth: Inequalities in the Occurrence of Low Birthweight Babies in Ireland. Institute of Public Health in Ireland.Google Scholar
Niedhammer, I., Murrin, C., O'Mahony, D., Daly, S., Morrison, J. & Kelleher, C. (2012) Explanations for social inequalities in preterm delivery in the Prospective Lifeways Cohort in the Republic of Ireland. European Journal of Public Health 22(4), 533–538.Google Scholar
Oaxaca, R. (1973) Male–female wage differentials in urban labour markets. International Economic Review 14, 693–709.Google Scholar
Quail, A., Williams, J., McCrory, C., Murray, A. & Thornton, M. (2011) A Summary Guide to Wave 1 of the Infant Cohort (at 9 months) of Growing Up in Ireland. Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin.Google Scholar
Radloff, L. S. (1977) The CES-D scale: a self report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement 1, 385–401.Google Scholar
Wagstaff, A. (2002) Inequality aversion, health inequalities and health achievement. Journal of Health Economics 2, 627–641.Google Scholar