Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:02:49.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quality of life, intellectual development and behavioural characteristics of single children in China: evidence from a 1980 survey in Changsha, Hunan Province

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Dudley L. Poston  and
Mei-Yu Yu
Dudley L. Poston
Affiliation:
Population Research Center, University of Texas, Austin, USA
Mei-Yu Yu
Affiliation:
Population Research Center, University of Texas, Austin, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper reports the results of a June 1980 survey of 1069 children in Changsha, Hunan Province. The data have been unavailable previously either in Chinese or in English. In general, they suggest that comparisons of single children with children from multiple-child families in China regarding quality of life, intellectual development, and behavioural traits are similar to comparisons conducted in the United States and other western countries. As in many western studies, single children in China appear to have a better quality of life than children with siblings. Regarding intellectual development, single children in China perform better than those with siblings, a finding which is consonant with the family intactness model of Falbo. Single children in Changsha are little different from ones from multiple-child families on various aspects of behaviour, and are more co-operative and less hostile. These findings are the opposite of those of the Shanghai study, the other major analysis of single children in China; the Shanghai survey indicated that single children were not as well-behaved as those with siblings, a finding that caused some concern among Chinese social scientists. To the extent that the findings of the Changsha study, and not those of the Shanghai study, reflect the situation of single children in China, this could mean that the one-child family planning campaign may not be having a negative impact on children's behaviour.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 127 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anhui University (1982) A survey of one-child families in Anhui Province, China. Stud. Fam. Plann. 13, 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beijing Review (1984) Marital status of China's population. 27, No. 10, 23.Google Scholar
Blake, J. (1981) The only child in America: prejudice versus performance. Popul. Dev. Rev. 7, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, F. (1982) China: Alive in the Bitter Sea. Times Books, New York.Google Scholar
Chen, M.H. (1979) Birth planning in China. Int. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 5, 92.Google Scholar
Ching, C.C. (1982) The one-child family in China: the need for psychosocial research. Stud. Fam. Plann. 13, 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falbo, T. (1978) Reasons for having an only child. J. Popul. 1, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falbo, T. (1982) The one-child family in the United States: research issues and results. Stud. Fam. Plann. 13, 212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunan Province Family Planning Office (1981) The status of family planning in Hunan Province: 1980. Jihua Shengyu Jianbao (Bull. Fam. Plann.) March, 26.Google Scholar
Polit, D.F. (1982) Effects of Family Size: A Critical Review of Literature Since 1973. Final Report. American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Shanghai Preschool Education Study Group (1980) Family education of only children. Chinese Women, 5, 16.Google Scholar
State Statistical Bureau (1983) 10 Percent Sample Tabulation on the 1982 Population Census of the People's Republic of China. State Statistical Publishing House, Beijing.Google Scholar
Tien, H.Y. (1983) China: demographic billionaire. Popul. Bull. 38, No. 2, 1.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R.B. & Markus, G.B. (1975) Birth order and intellectual development. Psychol. Rev. 82, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar