Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:52:51.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patterns of Family Building and Contraceptive Use of Middle-Class Couples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Diana Woodward ,
Ann Heath  and
Lynne Chisholm
Diana Woodward
Affiliation:
Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield
Ann Heath
Affiliation:
Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield
Lynne Chisholm
Affiliation:
Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Interviews with 103 middle-class wives on their family building experiences and use of birth control techniques show this highly educated group to be effective family planners in comparison with other social groups. The wives developed clear ideas early in marriage about family size, timing and spacing, formulated with reference to sets of beliefs about the transmission of cultural advantage from parents to children, and their social responsibility in relation to world population levels. Ideas about the spacing of children and desired family size appear to be influenced by the women’s orientation towards returning to employment, but their relatively late age of terminating full-time education has had remarkably little effect on the timing of either marriage or the first child’s birth. Female contraceptive methods were most popular with this sample, and their relative effectiveness as family planners may be explained by their preference for the more reliable techniques and high level of motivation to use them efficiently. Variations in patterns of contraceptive usage noted between this and other studies are probably a function of age differences in the groups of women surveyed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , January 1978 , pp. 39 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astin, H.S. (1967) Factors associated with the participation of women doctorates in the labor force. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 45, 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1951) Maternal Care and Mental Health. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969) Attachment and Loss. Hogarth Press, London.Google Scholar
Busfield, J. (1974) Ideologies and reproduction. In: The Integration of the Child into a Social World. Edited by Richards, M. P. M.. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Cartwright, A. (1970) Parents and Family Planning Services. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Cartwright, A. (1976) How Many Children? Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Clarke, A.M. & Clarke, A.D.B. (1976) Early Experience: Myth and Evidence. Open Books, London.Google Scholar
Fraser, A.C. & Watson, P.S. (1968) Family planning: a myth. Practitioner, 201, 351.Google ScholarPubMed
Hawthorn, G. (1970) The Sociology of Fertility: Themes and Issues in Modern Sociology. Collier-Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Hawthorn, G. (1974) The birth rate and what lies behind it. New Society, 4 07, 8.Google Scholar
Hubback, J. (1955) The fertility of graduate women. Eugen. Rev. 47, 107.Google Scholar
Kelsall, R.K., Poole, A. & Kuhn, A. (1970) Six Years After. Higher Education Research Unit, Sheffield University.Google Scholar
Kelsall, R.K., Poole, A. & Kuhn, A. (1971) Marriage and family building patterns of university graduates. J. biosoc. Sci. 3, 281.Google Scholar
Kelsall, R.K., Poole, A. & Kuhn, A. (1972) Graduates: The Sociology of an Elite. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Peel, J. (1970) The Hull Family Survey, I. The survey couples, 1966. J. biosoc. Sci. 2, 45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peel, J. (1972) The Hull Family Survey, II. Family planning in the first 5 years of marriage. J. biosoc. Sci. 4, 333.Google Scholar
Perrucci, C.C. (1968) Mobility, marriage and child spacing among college graduates. J. Marr. & Fam. 30, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Registrar General (1964) Statistical Review for 1962. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. (1972) Maternal Deprivation Reassessed. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middle-sex.Google Scholar
Woolf, M. (1971) Family Intentions. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Woolf, M. & Pegden, S. (1976) Families Five Years On. HM Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar