Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:38:44.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PARENTAL STATUS AND GENDER PREFERENCES FOR CHILDREN: IS DIFFERENTIAL FERTILITY STOPPING CONSISTENT WITH THE TRIVERS–WILLARD HYPOTHESIS?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2012

MARTIN KOLK  and
SEBASTIAN SCHNETTLER
MARTIN KOLK
Affiliation:
Demography Unit, Department of Sociology, Stockholm University, Sweden
SEBASTIAN SCHNETTLER
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Konstanz, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Based on evolutionary reasoning, Trivers & Willard (1973) predicted status-biased sex composition and parental investment with son-preferencing effects in higher, and daughter-preferencing effects in lower status groups. Previous research shows mixed results. This study uses event-history methods and Swedish register data to study one possible mechanism in isolation: do parents in different status groups vary in their proclivities to continue fertility based on the sex composition of previous offspring? The results show no support for the Trivers–Willard hypothesis on a wide range of different status indicators. Future research on the stated hypothesis should focus on physiological rather than behavioural mechanisms.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 45 , Issue 5 , September 2013 , pp. 683 - 704
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, D. & Edlund, L. (2007) Trivers–Willard at birth and one year: evidence from US natality data 1983–2001. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B: Biological Sciences 274(1624), 2491–2496.Google ScholarPubMed
Andersson, G., Hank, K., Rønsen, M. & Vikat, A. (2006) Gendering family composition: sex preferences for children and childbearing behavior in the Nordic countries. Demography 43(2), 255–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersson, G., Hank, K. & Vikat, A. (2007) Understanding parental gender preferences in advanced societies: lessons from Sweden and Finland. Demographic Research 17(6), 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, G. & Kolk, M. (2011) Trends in childbearing and nuptiality in Sweden: an update with data up to 2007. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research 46, 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, G., Rønsen, M., Knudsen, L. B., Lappegård, T., Neyer, G., Skrede, K., Teschner, K. & Vikat, A. (2009) Cohort fertility patterns in the Nordic countries. Demographic Research 20(14), 313–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (eds) (1992) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (2005) The Cultural Animal: Human Nature, Meaning, and Social Life. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bélanger, D. (2002) Sex selective abortions: short-term and long-term perspectives. Reproductive Health Matters 10(19), 194–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bereczkei, T. & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1997) Female-biased reproductive strategies in a Hungarian Gypsy population. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 264(1378), 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, R. (2005) Social Mobility in Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brockmann, H. (2001) Girls preferred? Changing patterns of sex preferences in the two German states. European Sociological Review 17(2), 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. R. & Silk, J. B. (2002) Reconsidering the null hypothesis: is maternal rank associated with birth sex ratios in primate groups? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99(17), 11252–11255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M. (1995) Evolutionary psychology: a new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry 6(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, E. Z. & Dalerum, F. (2009) A Trivers–Willard effect in contemporary humans: male-biased sex ratios among billionaires. PLoS One 4(1), e4195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catalano, R. A., Ahern, J. & Bruckner, T. (2007) Estimating the health effects of macrosocial shocks: a collaborative approach. In Galen, S. (ed.) Macrosocial Determinants of Population Health. Springer, New York, pp. 375–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalano, R. A., Zilko, C. E. M., Saxton, K. B. & Bruckner, T. (2010) Selection in utero: a biological response to mass layoffs. American Journal of Human Biology 22(3), 396–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronk, L. (2007) Boy or girl: gender preferences from a Darwinian point of view. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 15, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dribe, M. & Stanfors, M. (2010) Family life in power couples. Continued childbearing and union stability among the educational elite in Sweden, 1991–2005. Demographic Research 23, 847–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duvander, A-Z. & Andersson, G. (2003) När har vi råd att skaffa fler barn? En studie om hur inkomst påverkar fortsatt barnafödande [When can we afford more children? A study on how income affects continued childbearing.] RFV analyserar, No. 8.Google Scholar
Edin, K. A. & Hutchinson, E. P. (1935) Studies of Differential Fertility in Sweden. PS King & Son, London.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Festa-Bianchet, M. (1996) Offspring sex ratio studies of mammals: does publication depend upon the quality of the research or the direction of the results? Ecoscience 3(1), 42–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fieder, M. & Huber, S. (2007) The effects of sex and childlessness on the association between status and reproductive output in modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior 28(6), 392–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freese, J. & Powell, B. (1999) Sociobiology, status, and parental investment in sons and daughters: testing the Trivers–Willard hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology 104(6), 1704–1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freese, J. & Powell, B. (2001) Making love out of nothing at all? Null findings and the Trivers–Willard hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology 106(6), 1776–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaulin, S. J. C. & Robbins, C. J. (1991) Trivers–Willard effect in contemporary North American society. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 85(1), 61–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, A. B. & Weakliem, D. L. (2009) Of beauty, sex, and power: too little attention has been paid to the statistical challenges in estimating small effects. American Scientist 97(4), 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, S. M. (2002) Sex selection/determination in India: contemporary developments. Reproductive Health Matters 10(19), 190–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, V. J. (2007) Could maternal testosterone levels govern mammalian sex ratio deviations? Journal of Theoretical Biology 246(4), 708–719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, V. J. & Irwin, R. J. (2005) Follicular fluid steroid levels and subsequent sex of bovine embryos. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Comparative Experimental Biology 303A(12), 1120–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, V. J. & Irwin, R. J. (2009) A simple model for adaptive variation in the sex ratios of mammalian offspring. Journal of Theoretical Biology 258(1), 38–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, V. J., Irwin, R. J., Standley, N. T., Shelling, A. N. & Chamley, L. W. (2008) Sex of bovine embryos may be related to mothers' preovulatory follicular testosterone. Biology of Reproduction 78(5), 812–815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hank, K. (2007) Parental gender preferences and reproductive behaviour: a review of the recent literature. Journal of Biosocial Science 39(5), 759–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hank, K. & Kohler, H-P. (2000) Gender preferences for children in Europe: empirical results from 17 FFS countries. Demographic Research 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedström, P. (2005) Dissecting the Social. On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henz, U. & Johnsson, J. O. (2003) Who marries whom in Sweden? In Blossfeld, H.-P. & Timm, A. (eds) Who Marries Whom? Educational Systems as Marriage Markets in Modern Societies. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, pp. 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henz, U. & Sundström, M. (2001) Partner choice and women's paid work in Sweden. The role of earnings. European Sociological Review 17, 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesketh, T. & Xing, Z. W. (2006) Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: causes and consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103(36), 13271–13275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoem, J. M., Neyer, G. & Andersson, G. (2006) Educational attainment and ultimate fertility among Swedish women born in 1955–59. Demographic Research 14(16), 381–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopcroft, R. L. (2005) Parental status and differential investment in sons and daughters: Trivers–Willard revisited. Social Forces 83(3), 1111–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hvistendahl, M. (2011) Unnatural Selection: Choosing Boys Over Girls, and the Consequences of a World Full of Men. Public Affairs.Google Scholar
James, W. H. (2006) Possible constraints on adaptive variation in sex ratio at birth in humans and other primates. Journal of Theoretical Biology 238(2), 383–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W. H. (2008) The variations of human sex ratio at birth with time of conception within the cycle, coital rate around the time of conception, duration of time taken to achieve conception, and duration of gestation: a synthesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology 255(2), 199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W. H. (2009) The variations of human sex ratio at birth during and after wars, and their potential explanations. Journal of Theoretical Biology 257(1), 116–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufmann, F-X., Kuijsten, A., Schulze, H-J. & Strohmeier, K. P. (eds) (1998) Family Life and Family Policies in Europe. Volume 1: Structures and Trends in the 1980s. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, F-X., Kuijsten, A., Schulze, H-J. & Strohmeier, K. P. (eds) (2002) Family Life and Family Policies in Europe. Volume 2: Problems and Issues in Comparative Perspective. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Keller, M. C., Nesse, R. M. & Hofferth, S. (2001) The Trivers–Willard hypothesis of parental investment: no effect in the contemporary United States. Evolution and Human Behavior 22(5), 343–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolk, M. (2011) Deliberate birth spacing in nineteenth century northern Sweden. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie 27(3), 337–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koziel, S. & Ulijaszek, S. J. (2001) Waiting for Trivers and Willard: do the rich really favor sons? American Journal of Physical Anthropology 115(1), 71–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lareau, A. (2003) Unequal Childhoods. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Larsson, S. (2007) Wage Data for Sweden, 1800–2005. Sveriges Riksbank, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Lazarus, J. (2002) Human sex ratios: adaptations and mechanisms, problems, and prospects. In Hardy, I. C. W. (ed.) Sex Ratios: Concepts and Research Methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 287–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, B. S. & Clarke, A. L. (1992) Resources and the life course: patterns through the demographic transition. Ethology and Sociobiology 13(5–6), 463–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lye, D. N. (1996) Adult child–parent relationships. Annual Review of Sociology 22(1), 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, W. C. & Immerman, R. S. (2008) A test of the Trivers–Willard hypothesis with three samples of high-achieving men: a tenuous fit for an altricial, fathering-intensive species. Mankind Quarterly 49(2), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, W. C. & Coney, N. (1987) Human sex ratios as a function of the woman's psychodynamics. A preliminary study. Ethology and Sociobiology 8(1), 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margerison Zilko, C. E. (2010) Economic contraction and birth outcomes: an integrative review. Human Reproduction Update 16(4), 445–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nauck, B. (2001) Der Wert von Kindern für ihre Eltern. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 53(3), 407–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nauck, B. (2005) Changing value of children: an action theory of fertility behavior and intergenerational relationships in cross-cultural comparison. In Friedlmeier, W., Chakkarath, P. & Schwarz, B. (eds) Culture and Human Development: The Importance of Cross-Cultural Research. Psychology Press, New York, pp. 183–202.Google Scholar
Nauck, B. & Klaus, D. (2007) The varying value of children: empirical results from eleven societies in Asia, Africa and Europe. Current Sociology 55(4), 487–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollet, T. V., Fawcett, T. W., Buunk, A. P. & Nettle, D. (2009) Sex-ratio biasing towards daughters among lower-ranking co-wives in Rwanda. Biology Letters 5(6), 765–768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruckstuhl, K., Colijn, G., Amiot, V. & Vinish, E. (2010) Mother's occupation and sex ratio at birth. BMC Public Health 10(1), 269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runciman, W. G. (2009) The Theory of Cultural and Social Selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCB (1982) Socioekonomisk Indelning (SEI) (No. 4) Meddelanden i samordningsfrågor. Statistics Sweden, Stockholm. URL: http://www.scb.se/statistik/_publikationer/OV9999_1982A01_BR_X11%C3%96P8204.pdfGoogle Scholar
Schnettler, S. (2010) Nature+nurture=love? A test of the Trivers–Willard hypothesis of differential parental investment on the basis of sociological and biological explanations. Dissertation, Yale University, Ann Arbor, MI (UMI).Google Scholar
Scott, S. & Duncan, C. (1999) Reproductive strategies and sex-biased investment. Human Nature 10(1), 85–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seiver, D. A. (1978) Which couples at given parities have additional births? Research in Population Economics 1, 309–319.Google Scholar
Sudha, S. & Rajan, S. I. (1999) Female demographic disadvantage in India 1981–1991: sex selective abortions and female infanticide. Development and Change 30(3), 585–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teitelbaum, M. S. (1972) Factors associated with the sex ratio in human populations. In Harrison, G. A. & Boyce, A. J. (eds) The Structure of Human Populations. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 90–109.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. & Willard, D. E. (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179(4068), 90–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsuya, N. O., Feng, W., Alter, G. & Lee, J. Z. (eds) (2010) Prudence and Pressure: Reproduction and Human Agency in Europe and Asia, 1700–1900. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voland, E., Dunbar, R. I. M., Engel, C. & Stephan, P. (1997) Population increase and sex-biased parental investment in humans: evidence from 18th- and 19th-century Germany. Current Anthropology 38(1), 129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, F. A. (1939) The inheritance of strong parental instinct. Journal of Heredity 30(7), 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrong, D. H. (1980) Class Fertility Trends in Western Nations. Ayer Publishing.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, K. & Ferguson, L. R. (1995) The stopping and spacing of childbirths and their birth-history predictors: rational-choice theory and event-history analysis. American Sociological Review 60(2), 272–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Z. (1997) Deliberate birth control under a high-fertility regime: reproductive behavior in China before 1970. Population and Development Review 23(4), 729–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar