Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:32:33.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The origins of fluctuations in the human secondary sex ratio

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Alun M. Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Guy's Hospital Medical School, London

Summary

A probabilistic model of the human reproductive process is used to assess the success of hypotheses designed to explain human sex ratio fluctuations. It is shown that theories based on different maturation rates or effective lifetimes of X- and Y-bearing spermatozoa cannot account for many of the major sex ratio fluctuations.

A specific physiological model is proposed, based on differential motility of the two types of spermatozoa in the female reproductive tract, which together with differential fetal mortality, accounts successfully for most of the ratio fluctuations. On this theory the principal factor determining sex ratio is the physiological state of the female reproductive tract which in turn is governed by complex physiological and psychological parameters.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberman, E. & Creasy, M.R. (1975) Factors affecting chromosome abnormalities in human conceptions. In: Chromosome Variation in Human Evolution, p. 83. Edited by Boyce, A.J.. Taylor & Francis, London.Google Scholar
Allan, T.M. (1975) ABO blood groups and human sex ratio at birth. J. Reprod. Fert. 43, 209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Austin, C.R. (1972) Fertilisation. In: Reproduction in Mammals, 1, p. 103. Edited by Austin, C.R. & Short, R.V.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barlow, P. & Vosa, C.G. (1970) The Y chromosome in human spermatozoa. Nature, Lond. 226, 961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, R.A. (1975a) Genetics of animal spermatozoa. In: Gamete Competition in Plants and Animals, p. 61. Edited by Mulcahy, D.L.. North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Beatty, R.A. (1975b) Sperm diversity within the species. In: The Functional Anatomy of the Spermatozoon, p. 319. Edited by Afzelius, B.A.. Pergamon Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, K.J., Herschel, S., Hungershofer, R. & Schwinger, E. (1976) The effect of steroid hormones on motility and selective migration of X- and Y-bearing human spermatozoa. Fert. Steril. 27, 407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brouer, K.H., Winkhaus, I., Sombroek, H. & Kaiser, R. (1976) Frequency of Y-chromatin bearing spermatozoa in intracervical and intrauterine postcoital tests. Int. J. Fert. 21, 181.Google Scholar
Erickson, J.D. (1976) The secondary sex ratio in the United States 1969–71: association with race, parental ages, birth order, paternal education and legitimacy. Ann. hum. Genet. 40, 205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ericsson, R.J., Langevin, C.N. & Nishino, M. (1973) Isolation of fractions rich in human Y sperm. Nature, Lond. 246, 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J.M., Douglas, T.A. & Renton, J.P. (1975) An attempt to separate fractions rich in human Y sperm. Nature, Lond. 253, 352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fechheimer, N.S. & Beatty, R.A. (1974) Chromosome abnormalities and sex ratio in rabbit blastocysts. J. Reprod. Fert. 37, 331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garfinkel, J. & Selvin, S. (1976) A multivariate analysis of the relationships between parental age and birth order and the human secondary sex ratio. J. biosoc. Sci. 8, 113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glucksmann, A. (1974) Sexual dimorphism in animals. Biol. Rev. 49, 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, H. & Roberts, A.M. (1976) Differences in motility of human X- and Y-bearing spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Fert. 48, 433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerrero, R. (1970) Sex ratio: a statistical association with the type and time of insemination in the menstrual cycle. Int. J. Fert. 15, 221.Google ScholarPubMed
Guerrero, R. (1974) Association of the type and time of insemination within the menstrual cycle with the human sex ratio at birth. New Eng. J. Med. 291, 1056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W.H. (1970) The incidence of spontaneous abortion. Popul. Stud. 24, 241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W.H. (1971a) Cycle day of insemination, coital rate and sex ratio. Lancet, i, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W.H. (1971b) Excess of like sexed pairs of dizygotic twins. Nature, Lond. 232, 277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W.H. (1973) The fecundability of US women. Popul. Stud. 27, 493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W.H. (1975) The distribution of the combinations of the sexes in mammalian litters. Genet. Res., Camb. 26, 45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W.H. (1976) The possibility of a flaw underlying Weinberg's differential rule. Ann. hum. Genet. 40, 197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, M.H. (1973) Analysis of the first cleavage division to determine the sex ratio and incidence of chromosome anomalies at conception in the mouse. J. Reprod. Fert. 35, 67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, C.A. (1969) Embryonal Sex Ratio in Animals and Man. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, USA.Google Scholar
MacMahon, B. & Pugh, T.F. (1954) Sex ratio of white births in the US during the second world war. Am. J. hum. Genet. 6, 284.Google Scholar
McLaren, A. (1973) Law and Ethics of AID and Embryo Transfer. CIBA Foundation Symposium 17, p. 38. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Moghissi, K.S. (1973) Composition and function of cervical secretion. Handbook of Physiology, Section 7, 2, 25.Google Scholar
Novitski, E. & Sandler, L. (1956) The relationship between parental age, birth order and the secondary sex ratio in humans. Ann. hum. Genet. 21, 123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkes, A.S. (1974) Sexuality and reproduction. Perspect. Biol. Med. 17, 399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, D.W. (1975) Artificial insemination in the human. In: Modern Trends in Human Genetics, Vol. 2 p. 404. Edited by Emery, A.E.H.. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Roberts, A.M. (1972) Gravitational separation of X and Y spermatozoa. Nature, Lond. 238, 223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, A.M. & Goodall, H. (1976) Y chromosome visibility in quinacrine-stained human spermatozoa. Nature, Lond. 262, 493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohde, W., Portsmann, T. & Dorner, G. (1973) Migration of Y-bearing human spermatozoa in cervical mucus. J. Reprod. Fert. 33, 167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, A., Robinson, J.A. & Evans, H.J. (1975) Failure to confirm a separation of X- and Y- bearing human spermatozoa using bovine serum albumin gradients. Nature, Lond. 253, 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Settlage, D.S.F., Motoshima, M. & Tredway, D.R. (1973) Sperm transport from the external cervical os to the fallopian tubes in women: a time and quantitation study. Fert. Steril. 24, 655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, A.T. & Robinson, J.A. (1976a) A difference in dry mass between the heads of X- and Y-bearing human spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Fert. 48, 9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teitelbaum, M.S. (1972) Factors associated with the sex ratio in human populations. In: The Structure of Human Populations, p. 73. Edited by Harrison, G.A. & Boyce, A.J.. Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Westoff, C.F. (1974) Coital frequency and contraception. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 6, 136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed