Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:09:54.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the absence of implicit sex-preference in Ghana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Jack Goody
Affiliation:
Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge
Colin Duly
Affiliation:
Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge
Ian Beeson
Affiliation:
Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge
Graham Harrison
Affiliation:
Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge

Summary

As part of a comparative analysis of uterine sibling groups to discover any evidence of ‘stopping rules’ related to actual preferences for children of one sex or another, the distribution of sequences of births by sex from a Ghanaian sample of 9392 mothers has been examined. No such rules can be detected.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addo, N.O. & Goody, J.R. (1974) Siblings in Ghana. University of Ghana Population Studies, No. 7. Legon, Ghana.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J.C. (1968) Population Growth and Family Change in Africa: the New Urban Elite in Ghana, pp. 27, 83, 89. Australian National University Press, Canberra.Google Scholar
Goody, J.R. (1973) Strategies of heirship. Comp. Stud. Soc. History, 15, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A.W.F. (1961) A factorial analysis of sex-ratio data. Ann. hum. Genet. 25, 117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, A.W.F. (1962) A factorial analysis of sex-ratio data: a correction of the article in Vol. 25. 111. Ann. hum. Genet. 25, 343.Google Scholar
Edwards, A.W.F. (1966) Sex-ratio data analysed independently of family limitation. Ann. hum. Genet. 29, 337.Google Scholar
Geissler, A. (1889) Beitrage zur Frage des Geschlechtsverhaltnisses der Geborenen. Z. K. Sachsischen Statistichen Bureaus, 35, 1.Google Scholar
Hill, R., Styles, J.N. & Back, K.W. (1959). The Family and Population Control, p. 2. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Teitelbaum, M.S. (1970) Factors affecting the sex ratio in large populations. J. biosoc. Sci. Suppl. 2, 61.Google Scholar
Williamson, N.E. (1976) Sons or Daughters? A Cross-cultural Survey of Parental Preferences. Sage Publications, Beverley Hills, California.Google Scholar