Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T11:18:01.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Number of friends and self-perception among Jamaican children: the role of attractiveness and fluctuating asymmetry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2019

A.S. Jacobson ,
R. Trivers  and
B.G. Palestis
A.S. Jacobson*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
R. Trivers
Affiliation:
Southfield, St Elizabeth, Jamaica
B.G. Palestis
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Wagner College, Staten Island, NY, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The role that physical attractiveness and fluctuating asymmetry (FA), a measure of developmental instability, play in self-perception and peer associations were explored in a well-studied cohort of Jamaican children using a novel research paradigm where subjects were already known to each other for extensive periods of time. The results showed that how attractive a child was perceived by others was significantly positively correlated with self-ratings of attractiveness. Contrary to findings from WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) samples, the study found a reversal in the sex differences in self-perceived attractiveness and self-esteem, where Jamaican females rate themselves more attractive and report higher self-esteem than do males. Attractiveness also predicts overall popularity, as measured by desirability as a friend and the percentage of peers who choose an individual as a friend. Attractive individuals of both sexes were chosen more often as ‘friends’. A significant correlation was also found between an individual’s FA and the average FA of those chosen as friends. However, the effect was primarily due to preferences by males for female friends possessing similar levels of FA, which could be an effective strategy in reducing future mating effort.

Keywords

Peer associationsFluctuating asymmetrySelf-perception
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , March 2020 , pp. 184 - 197
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adolphs, R and Tusche, A (2017) From faces to prosocial behavior: cues, tools and mechanisms. Current Directions in Psychological Science 26, 282–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akbar, M, Chambers, JW Jr and Thompson, VLS (2001) Racial identity, Africentric values and self-esteem in Jamaican children. Journal of Black Psychology 27, 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altabe, M (1998) Ethnicity and body image: quantitative and qualitative analysis. International Journal of Eating Disorders 23, 153–159.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, C, John, OP, Keltner, D and Kring, AM (2001) Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81, 116–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berscheid, E and Walster, E (1974) Physical attractiveness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 7, 157–215.Google Scholar
Bhogal, MS, Bartlett, JE and Farrelly, D (2018) The Influence of Mate Choice Motivation on Non-Financial Altruism. URL: psyarxiv.com/gc8en (accessed 15 January 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhogal, MS, Galbraith, N and Manktelow, K (2016) Physical attractiveness and altruism in two modified dictator games. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 38, 212–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canning, A, Andrew, E, Murphy, R, Walker, JS and Snowden, RJ (2017) Gender differences in the relationship between self-esteem and aggression in young people leaving care. Violence and Gender 4, 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cash, TF (1985) Physical appearance and mental health. In Adams, GR (ed) The Psychology of Cosmetic Treatments. Praeger Publishers, New York, pp. 196–216.Google Scholar
Clifford, MM and Walster, E (1973) The effect of physical attractiveness on teacher expectation. Sociology of Education 46, 248–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, PS (1993) Self-esteem and facial attractiveness in learning disabled children. Child Study Journal 23, 79–89.Google Scholar
DeBruine, LM, Jones, BC, Crawford, JR, Welling, LL and Little, AC (2010) The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 277, 2405–2410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiGiunta, L, Pastorelli, C, Thartori, E, Bombi, AS, Baumgartner, E, Fabes, RA and Enders, CK (2018) Trajectories of Italian children’s peer rejection: associations with aggression, prosocial behavior, physical attractiveness, and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 46, 1021–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dion, KK, Berscheid, E and Walster, E (1972) What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24, 285–290.Google Scholar
Domingue, BW, Belsky, DW, Fletcher, JM, Conley, D, Boardman, JD and Harris, KM (2018) The social genome of friends and schoolmates in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 115(4), 702–707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dormann, CF, Elith, J, Bacher, S, Buchmann, C, Carl, G, Carré, G and Lautenbach, S (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epley, N and Whitchurch, E (2008) Mirror, mirror on the wall: enhancement in self-recognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34, 1159–1170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feingold, A (1988) Matching for attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends: a meta-analysis and theoretical critique. Psychological Bulletin 104, 226–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, B, Neave, N, Manning, JT and Grammer, K (2005) Facial symmetry and the ‘big-five’ personality factors. Personality and Individual Differences 39, 523–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, B, Neave, N, Manning, JT and Grammer, K (2006) Facial symmetry and judgments of attractiveness, health and personality. Personality and Individual Differences 41, 491–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, B and Penton-Voak, I (2002) Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11, 154–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzoi, SL and Herzog, ME (1987) Judging physical attractiveness: what body aspects do we use? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 13, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlow, B, Gangestad, SW and Armijo-Prewitt, T (1998) Developmental stability and human violence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 265, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gangestad, SW and Buss, DM (1993) Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology 14, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangestad, SW and Thornhill, R (1999) Individual differences in developmental precision and fluctuating asymmetry: a model and its implications. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12, 402–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangestad, SW, Thornhill, R and Yeo, RA (1994) Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology 15, 73–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, JH and Özener, B (2016) Fluctuating asymmetry of human populations: a review. Symmetry 8, 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grammer, K, Fink, B, Møller, AP and Thornhill, R (2003) Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews 78, 385–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grammer, K and Thornhill, R (1994) Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology 108, 233–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grebe, NM, Falcon, RG and Gangestad, SW (2017) p-Curve and selection methods as meta-analytic supplements for biologists: a demonstration of effect size estimation in studies of human fluctuating asymmetry. Symmetry 9, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, AM and Langlois, JH (2006) Stereotype directionality and attractiveness stereotyping: is beauty good or is ugly bad? Social Cognition 24, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J, Heine, SJ and Norenzayan, A (2010) The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33, 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, D, Bates, TC, Dykiert, D, Der, G and Deary, IJ (2013) Bodily symmetry increases across human childhood. Early Human Development 89, 531–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hume, DK and Montgomerie, R (2001) Facial attractiveness signals different aspects of ‘quality’ in women and men. Evolution and Human Behavior 22, 93–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, BC, Little, AC, Penton-Voak, IS, Tiddeman, BP, Burt, DM and Perrett, DI (2001) Facial symmetry and judgments of apparent health: support for a ‘good genes’ explanation of the attractiveness-symmetry relationship. Evolution and Human Behavior 22, 417–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S, Moulton, M, Moulton, P and Roach, S (1999) Self-esteem as a function of race and weight preoccupation: findings and implications. Women’s Health Issues 9, 50–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Judge, TA, Hurst, C and Simon, LN (2009) Does it pay to be smart, attractive, or confident (or all three)? Relationships among general mental ability, physical attractiveness, core self-evaluations, and income. Journal of Applied Psychology 94, 742–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, M, Frohlich, M and Emrich, E (2017) Self-concept in adolescents – relationship between sport participation, motor performance and personality traits. Sports 5, 22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knox, M, Funk, J, Elliott, R and Bush, EG (2000) Gender differences in adolescents’ possible selves. Youth & Society 31, 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, D and Adinolfi, AA (1975) Physical attractiveness, social relations and personality style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31, 245–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwon, Y (1997) Sex, sex-role, facial attractiveness, social self-esteem and interest in clothing. Perceptual and Motor Skills 84, 899–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlois, JH, Roggman, LA, Casey, RJ, Ritter, JM, Rieser-Danner, LA and Jenkins, VY (1987) Infant preferences for attractive faces: rudiments of a stereotype? Developmental Psychology 23, 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlois, JH, Kalakanis, L, Rubenstein, AJ, Larson, A, Hallam, M and Smoot, M (2000) Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin 126, 390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leamy, L (1997) Genetic analysis of fluctuating asymmetry for skeletal characters in mice. Journal of Heredity 88, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leung, B, Forbes, MR and Houle, D (2000) Fluctuating asymmetry as a bioindicator of stress: comparing efficacy of analyses involving multiple traits. American Naturalist 155, 101–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, AC, Burt, DM, Penton-Voak, IS and Perrett, DI (2001) Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 268, 39–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, AC, Jones, BC and DeBruine, LM (2011) Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 366, 1638–1659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maestripieri, D, Henry, A and Nickels, N (2017) Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40, e19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manning, JT (1995) Fluctuating Asymmetry and body weight in males and females: implications for sexual selection. Ethology and Sociobiology 16, 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, JT and Wood, D (1998) Fluctuating asymmetry and aggression in boys. Human Nature 9, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcinkowska, UM, Kozlov, MV, Cai, H, Contreras-Garduño, J, Dixson, BJ and Oana, GA (2014) Cross-cultural variation in men’s preference for sexual dimorphism in women’s faces. Biology Letters 10, 20130850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Møller, AP and Swaddle, JP (1997) Asymmetry, Developmental Stability and Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Morgan, LK and Kisley, MA (2014) The effects of facial attractiveness and perceiver’s mate value on adaptive allocation of central processing resources. Evolution and Human Behavior 35, 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, SC, von Hippel, W, Dubbs, SL, Angilletta, MJ Jr., Wilson, RS, Trivers, R and Barlow, FK (2015) The role of overconfidence in romantic desirability and competition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41, 1036–1052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palestis, BG and Trivers, R (2016) A longitudinal study of changes in fluctuating asymmetry with age in Jamaican youth. Symmetry 8, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, AR and Strobeck, C (2003) Fluctuating asymmetry analyses revisited. In Polak, M (ed.) Developmental Instability: Causes and Consequences. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 279–319.Google Scholar
Penton-Voak, IS, Jacobson, A and Trivers, R (2004) Populational differences in attractiveness judgments of male and female faces: comparing British and Jamaican samples. Evolution and Human Behavior 25, 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrin, RAC (1921) Physical attractiveness and repulsiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology 4, 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, HT, Nezlek, J and Wheeler, L (1980) Physical attractiveness in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38, 604–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, HT, Wheeler, L, Spiegel, N, Kernis, MH, Nezlek, J and Perri, M (1982) Physical attractiveness in social interaction: II. Why does appearance affect social experience? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43, 979–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, G, Simmons, LW and Peters, M (2005) Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution and Human Behavior 26, 186–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, SC, Little, AC, Gosling, LM, Perrett, D and Carter, V (2005) MHC-heterozygosity and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior 26, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M (1965) Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton University Press, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackelford, TK and Larsen, RJ (1997) Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72, 456–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sigall, H and Landy, D (1973) Radiating beauty: effects of having a physically attractive partner on person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28, 218–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, JA, Gangestad, SW and Leck, K (1999) Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76, 159–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, RT (1988) Kinship and Class in the West Indies: A Genealogical Study of Jamaica and Guyana. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, C, Yamagishi, T, Tanida, S, Kiyonari, T and Kanazawa, S (2006) Attractiveness and cooperation in social exchange. Evolutionary Psychology 4, 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tovée, MJ, Reinhardt, S, Emery, JL and Cornelissen, PL (1998) Optimal BMI and maximum sexual attractiveness. The Lancet 352, 548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, RL (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B (ed.) Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp. 136–179.Google Scholar
Trivers, R, Manning, JT, Thornhill, R, Singh, D and McGuire, M (1999) Jamaican symmetry project: long-term study of fluctuating asymmetry in rural Jamaican children. Human Biology 71, 417–430.Google ScholarPubMed
Trivers, R, Palestis, BP and Manning, JT (2013) The symmetry of children’s knees is linked to their adult sprinting speed and their willingness to sprint in a long-term Jamaican study. PLoS One 8(8), e72244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dongen, S and Gangestad, SW (2011) Human fluctuating asymmetry in relation to health and quality: a meta-analysis. Evolution and Human Behavior 32, 380–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Osch, Y, Blanken, I, Meijs, MHJ and van Wolferen, J (2015) A group’s physical attractiveness is greater than the average attractiveness of its members: the group attractiveness effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41, 559–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Valen, L (1962) A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution 16, 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Versluys, TM, Foley, RA and Skylark, WJ (2018) The influence of leg-to-body ratio, arm-to-body ratio and intra-limb ratio on male human attractiveness. Royal Society Open Science 5, 171790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, G, Cao, M, Sauciuvenaite, J, Bissland, R, Hacker, M, Hambly, C and Speakman, JR (2018) Different impacts of resources on opposite sex ratings of physical attractiveness by males and females. Evolution and Human Behavior 39, 220–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, JM and Manning, JT (1996) Fluctuating asymmetry and age in children: evolutionary implications for the control of developmental stability. Journal of Human Evolution 30, 529–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaatari, D, Palestis, BG and Trivers, R (2009) Fluctuating asymmetry of responders affects offers in the Ultimatum Game oppositely according to attractiveness or need as perceived by proposers. Ethology 115, 627–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaatari, D and Trivers, R (2007) Fluctuating asymmetry and behavior in the ultimatum game in Jamaica. Evolution and Human Behavior 28, 223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar