Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:30:01.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MATERNAL SENSITIVITY AND PERFORMANCE AND VERBAL INTELLIGENCE IN LATE CHILDHOOD AND ADOLESCENCE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2018

Curtis S. Dunkel  and
Michael A. Woodley of Menie
Curtis S. Dunkel*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL, USA
Michael A. Woodley of Menie
Affiliation:
Unz Foundation, Palo Alto, CA, USA Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Center Leo Apostel for Interdisciplinary Studies, Belgium
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between maternal sensitivity and offspring intelligence in late childhood and adolescence. Secondary data (N=117) from the Block and Block (2006a, b) 30-year longitudinal study of Californian children, which began in the late 1960s, was used to test the hypothesis that maternal sensitivity in childhood would be predictive of late childhood and adolescent intelligence. Correlational analyses revealed that maternal sensitivity, as judged by raters viewing mother’s interactions with their children in a set of four joint structured cognitive tasks when the child was 5 years of age, was associated with verbal and performance IQ test scores when the children were ages 11 and 18. Using hierarchical regression to control for child sex, socioeconomic status, child temperament, child baseline IQ (as measured at age 4), mother’s level of education and mother’s emotional nurturance, it was found that the maternal sensitivity and child and adolescent IQ association held for verbal, but not performance IQ. Furthermore, a pattern emerged in which the association between maternal sensitivity and verbal IQ was stronger for adolescents with a lower baseline IQ. The results suggest that maternal sensitivity is associated with offspring verbal intelligence and that this association holds when numerous variables are accounted for. Additionally, this association may be stronger for children with lower IQs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 48 - 58
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaver, K. M., Schwartz, J. A., Al-Ghamdi, M. S., Kobeisy, A. N., Dunkel, C. S. & Van der Linden, D. (2014) A closer look at the role of parenting-related influences on verbal intelligence over the life course: results from an adoption-based research design. Intelligence 46, 179–187.Google Scholar
Block, J. (1978) The Q-Sort Method in Personality Assessment and Psychiatric Research. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA. Originally published in 1961.Google Scholar
Block, J. H. (1965) The Child-Rearing Practices Report (CRPR): A Set of Q Items for the Description of Parental Socialization Attitudes and Values. Institute of Human Development, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Block, J. & Block, J. H. (2006a) Venturing a 30-year longitudinal study. American Psychologist 61, 315–337.Google Scholar
Block, J. & Block, J. H. (2006b) Block and Block Longitudinal Study, 1969–1999. V1 Version. Murray Research Archive (Distributor). URL: http://dvn.iq.harvard.edu/dvn/dv/mra/faces/study/StudyPage.xhtml?globalId=hdl:1902.1/NGQCIPIDUK&studyListingIndex=2_e3e414a92b8ffc99ae5ad3c701fb (accessed 27th October 2012).Google Scholar
Boccio, C. M. & Beaver, K. M. (2016) The influence of nonshared environmental factors on number and word recall test performance. Personality and Individual Differences 92, 46–51.Google Scholar
Chopik, W. J., Moors, A. C. & Edelstein, R. S. (2014) Maternal nurturance predicts decreases in attachment avoidance in emerging adulthood. Journal of Research in Personality 53, 47–53.Google Scholar
Deković, M., Janssens, J. M. & Gerris, J. R. (1991) Factor structure and construct validity of the Block Child Rearing Practices Report (CRPR). Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 3, 182–187.Google Scholar
Dunkel, C. S., Mathes, E. W., Kesselring, S. N., Decker, M. L. & Kelts, D. J. (2015) Parenting influence on the development of life history strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior 36, 374–378.Google Scholar
Dunkel, C. S. & Murphy, N. A. (2014) Predicting intellectual ability and scholastic outcomes with a single item: from early childhood to adulthood. Journal of Intelligence 2, 68–81.Google Scholar
Flynn, J. R. (2016) Does Your Family Make You Smarter? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. & Block, J. (1989) The role of ego-control, ego-resiliency, and IQ in delay of gratification in adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57, 1041–1050.Google Scholar
Funder, D. C., Block, J. H. & Block, J. (1983) Delay of gratification: some longitudinal personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44, 1198–1213.Google Scholar
Gorsuch, R. L. (2005) Continuous parameter estimation model: expanding the standard statistical paradigm. Journal of the Science Faculty of Chiang Mai University 32, 11–21.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., Turkheimer, E., Ohlsson, H., Sundquist, J. & Sundquist, K. (2015) Family environment and the malleability of cognitive ability: a Swedish national home-reared and adopted-away cosibling control study. PNAS 112, 4612–4617.Google Scholar
Kremen, A. M. & Block, J. (1998) The roots of ego-control in young adulthood: links with parenting in early childhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75, 1062–1075.Google Scholar
Letzring, T. D., Block, J. & Funder, D. C. (2005) Ego-control and ego-resiliency: generalization of self-report scales based on personality descriptions from self, acquaintances, and clinicians. Journal of Research in Personality 39, 395–422.Google Scholar
Loehlin, J. C., Hansell, N. K., Wright, M. J. & Martin, N. G. (2016) Genetic and environmental contributions to cognitive structure in Australian twins: a reappraisal. Intelligence 59, 24–31.Google Scholar
MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J. & Rucker, D. D. (2002) On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods 17, 19–40.Google Scholar