Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:40:51.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marriage and Family-Building Patterns of University Graduates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

R. Keith Kelsall ,
Anne Poole  and
Annette Kuhn
R. Keith Kelsall
Affiliation:
Higher Education Research Unit, Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield
Anne Poole
Affiliation:
Higher Education Research Unit, Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield
Annette Kuhn
Affiliation:
Higher Education Research Unit, Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The findings relating to marriage and fertility of the National Survey of 1960 Graduates show that highly-educated people are on the whole no exception to the generally observed principle of social and educational endogamy. Those from working-class homes, however, marry overwhelmingly into the middle class, so that marriage here constitutes a means of consolidating newly-won status. Respondents on the whole tended to delay marriage and family building while still engaged in full-time study, but more graduates are ultimately marrying and are doing so at younger ages than ever before. There are also certain consistent differences between the sexes, which indicate that women graduates are much more susceptible than men to the delaying influences on marriage and family building of the continued exposure to higher education.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , July 1971 , pp. 281 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blood, R.O. & Wolfe, D.M. (1960) Husbands and Wives. Free Press, Glencoe.Google Scholar
Bott, E. (1957) Family and Social Network. Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
Central Statistical Office (1967) Annual Abstract of Statistics. Table 25. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
General Register Office (1966) Census 1961 (England and Wales). Fertility Tables. HM Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Hubback, J. (1955) The fertility of graduate women. Eugen. Rev. 47, 107.Google ScholarPubMed
Jackson, B. & Marsden, D. (1952) Education and the Working Class. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Kelsall, R.K. (1963) Women and Teaching. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Kelsall, R.K., Poole, A. & Kuhn, A. (1970) Six Years After. Higher Education Research Unit, Sheffield University.Google Scholar
Pierce, R.M. (1963) Marriage in the fifties. Soc. Rev. 11, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, R.M. & Rowntree, G. (1961) Birth control in Britain, Part II. Popul. Stud. 15, 121.Google Scholar
Westoff, C.F. & Potvln, R.R. (1966) College Women and Fertility Values. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar