Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:31:39.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LINEAGE BASED DIFFERENCES IN GRANDPARENTAL INVESTMENT: A GENDER ALTERNATIVE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2012

JORIS GHYSELS
Affiliation:
TIER-institute, Faculty of Humanities and Sciences, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Debate
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Danielsbacka, M., Tanskanen, A. O., Jokela, M. & Rotkirch, A. (2011) Grandparental child care in Europe: evidence for preferential investment in more certain kin. Evolutionary Psychology 9(1), 324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghysels, J. (2011) The Provision of Informal Childcare by European Grandparents: Constraints versus Selective Preferences. CSB Working Papers, No. 2011. Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, Antwerp.Google Scholar
Glass, J. (1998) Gender liberation, economic squeeze or fear of strangers: why fathers provide infant care in dual-earner families. Journal of Marriage and Family 60(4), 821834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hank, K. & Buber, I. (2009) Grandparents caring for their grandchildren: findings from the 2004 Survey on Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. Journal of Family Issues 30(1), 5373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollet, T. V., Nelissen, M. & Nettle, D. (2009) Lineage based differences in grandparental investment: evidence from a large British cohort study. Journal of Biosocial Science 41(3), 355379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheelock, J. & Jones, K. (2002) ‘Grandparents are the next best thing’: informal childcare in working parents in urban Britain. Journal of Social Policy 31(3), 441463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar