Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:03:49.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INTERGENERATIONAL TRANSMISSION OF REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOUR IN BOTSWANA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2010

TABITHA T. LANGENI
TABITHA T. LANGENI
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Ontario, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The purpose of this study was to investigate intergenerational transmission of reproductive behaviour in Botswana. The major source of data was the 2001 Botswana AIDS Impact Survey where a nationally representative random sample of men and women aged 10–64 years was selected using a stratified two-stage probability sample design. Covariates in the analysis include age, education, marital status, religion, age at first birth, residence, duration at residence and contraceptive use. The main analytical technique is linear regression. The results indicate that the reproductive behaviour of older generations has a significantly positive influence on the reproductive behaviour of the subsequent generation, but does not affect the subsequent generation homogenously. The effect appeared much stronger for women who initiated childbearing at an older age, for women who had never been to school, and for the cohort aged 50–59 years. These findings suggest that number of siblings, as a reproductive behaviour determinant, may very well have confounded previous reproductive behaviour analyses in Botswana. The study draws attention to the importance of the effect of origin family size in determining reproductive behaviour outcomes in Botswana.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 51 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderton, D. L., Tsuya, N. O., Bean, L. L. & Mineau, D. G. P. (1987) Intergenerational transmission of relative fertility and life course patterns. Demography 24, 467–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, G. S. (1960) An Economic Analysis of Fertility: Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. & Barro, R. J. (1988) A reformulation of the economic theory of fertility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 103(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, G. S. & Lewis, G. H. (1973) On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy 81, S279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S. & Tomes, N. (1976) Child endowments and the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy 84(4), Part 2, S143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowdy, S. & Wearden, S. (1983) Statistics for Research. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 193–194.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. L. (1976) An Introduction to Linear Regression and Correlation. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, pp. 33–46.Google Scholar
Ermisch, J. F. (2003) An Economic Analysis of Family. Princeton University Press, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hank, K. (2007) Parental gender preferences and reproductive behaviour: a review of the recent literature. Journal of Biosocial Science 39, 759–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanushek, E. A. (1992) The trade-off between child quantity and quality. Journal of Political Economy 100(1), 84–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlap, S., Olson, S. H., Curtin, J. P., Caputo, T. A., Nakraseive, C., Sanchez, D. & Xue, X. (2002) Epithelial ovarian carcinoma and fertility of parents. Epidemiology 13(1), 59–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, R. (2003) The demographic transition: three centuries of fundamental change. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17, 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livi-Bacci, M. (2001) A Concise History of World Population. Blackwell, London.Google Scholar
McLanahan, S. & Bumpass, L. (1988) Intergenerational consequences of family disruption. American Journal of Sociology 94, 130–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M. & Knudsen, L. B. (2002) The intergenerational transmission of fertility in contemporary Denmark: the effects of number of siblings (full and half), birth order, and whether male or female. Population Studies 56(3), 235–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, K., Lee, A. & Bramley-Moore, L. (1899) Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. VI – genetic (reproductive) selection: inheritance of fertility in man, and of fecundity in thoroughbred racehorses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London A 192, 257–330.Google Scholar
Rodgers, J. L. & Nicewander, W. A. (1988) Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician 42(1), 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, A. & Camburn, D. (1987) The influence of the family on premarital sexual attitudes and behaviour. Demography 24, 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, M. (1997) Intergenerational transmission of reproductive behaviour in Saguenay at the end of the 19th century. Cahiers Quebecois de Demographie 26(1), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trent, K. (1994) Family context and adolescents' fertility expectations. Youth and Society 26, 118–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wellings, K., Wadsworth, J., Johnson, A., Field, J. & McDowall, W. (1999) Teenage fertility and life chances. Reviews of Reproduction 4, 184–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed