Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:56:18.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grounds for divorce in England and Wales—a social and demographic analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

John C. Haskey
John C. Haskey
Affiliation:
Cabinet Office, Central Statistical Office, Great George Street, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper examines the social and demographic features of divorcing couples by the grounds on which their decrees are made absolute and by the party granted the divorce. The demographic characteristics include ages at marriage and at divorce of husbands and of wives granted decrees, duration of marriage, number of children, and the social class of both the husband and the wife. The data are also analysed for particular categories of couples: those in which the wife is a housewife, couples where the husband is unemployed, couples who have a child which was pre-maritally conceived, and couples who have dependent children. There are clear and interesting differences in the demographic characteristics of couples who successfully petition on the various grounds, suggesting that the law is used in different ways by different couples. Reasons for the observed patterns are considered. The data provide some basis for assessing the possible repercussions on divorce of socioeconomic changes, and for informed discussion on whether and how divorce law might sensibly be improved.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 127 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beers, H.S. (1944) Six-term formulas for routine actuarial interpolation. Rec. Am. Inst. Actuaries, 33, Pt II, 68, 245.Google Scholar
Beers, H.S. (1945) Discussion. Rec. Am. Inst. Actuaries, 34, Pt I, 69, 59.Google Scholar
Chester, R. (1971) The duration of marriage to divorce. Br. J. Social. 22, 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chester, R. & Streather, J. (1972) Cruelty in English divorce: some empirical findings. J. Marr. & Fam. 34, 706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominian, J. (1979) Introduction to marital pathology. Br. med. J. 2, 424, 531, 594, 645, 720, 781, 854, 915, 987, 1053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eekelaar, J. (1982) Children in divorce: some further data. Oxf. J. leg. Stud. 2, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eekelaar, J. (1984) Family Law and Social Policy. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.Google Scholar
Eekelaar, J. & Clive, E. (1977) Custody after Divorce. SSRC Centre for Socio-legal Studies, Wolfson College, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. (1980) Divorce and the recourse to legal aid. Mod. Law Rev. 43, 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskey, J.C. (1983a) Children of divorcing couples. Popul. Trends, 31, 20.Google Scholar
Haskey, J.C. (1983b) Social class patterns of marriage. Popul. Trends. 34, 12.Google Scholar
Haskey, J.C. (1984) Social class and socioeconomic differentials in divorce in England and Wales. Popul. Stud. 38, 419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haskey, J.C. (1986) Secular change in divorce in England and Wales by class of decree—a socio-legal analysis. Biol. & Society, in press.Google ScholarPubMed
OPCS (1984) Conceptions Inside and Outside Marriage, 1969–1981. OPCS Monitor, FM 1 84/6. OPCS, London.Google Scholar