Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:48:14.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GENDER DIFFERENCES AS FACTORS IN SUCCESSFUL AGEING: A FOCUS ON SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2009

SANG-MI PARK ,
SOONG-NANG JANG  and
DONG-HYUN KIM
SANG-MI PARK
Affiliation:
Institute of Ageing, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
SOONG-NANG JANG
Affiliation:
Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA
DONG-HYUN KIM
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Over the past century, the population of Korea has aged rapidly as a result of decreasing fertility and mortality. Furthermore, the percentage of the population aged 65 and older is expected to double from 7% to 14% within 18 years, a much shorter doubling period than in most other developed countries. As Korean society ages, interest in healthy and successful ageing has increased. However, although previous studies have examined various determinants of successful ageing, such as socioeconomic status, gender differences have been neglected. This study investigated gender differences as factors in successful ageing among elderly men and women. Successful ageing has been defined as having high levels of physical and social functioning. Physical functioning includes having no difficulties with activities of daily living (ADL) or instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). Social functioning is defined as participation in at least one of the following social activities: paid work, religious gatherings or volunteer service. Data for this study were obtained from a representative sample of 761 community-living individuals aged 65–84 years (340 males, 421 females); the respondents were interviewed face-to-face as part of the third wave of the Hallym Ageing Study (2007). Socioeconomic status appears to have a greater gender-specific effect on physical functioning than on social functioning. Especially for elderly men, a higher monthly individual income was significantly related to a higher level of physical functioning. Among elderly women, a higher level of education was associated with a higher level of physical functioning. In a major metropolis, elderly men had low social functioning and elderly women had low physical functioning. As Korea's population ages, successful ageing has received much attention. This study shows that policies promoting successful ageing must consider gender differences and associated socioeconomic factors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , January 2010 , pp. 99 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, G. J., Clark, M. & Luszcz, M. (2002) Successful aging in the Australian Longitudinal Study of Aging: Applying the MacArthur model cross-nationally. Journal of Social Issues 4, 749–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltes, M. M. & Lang, F. R. (1997) Everyday functioning and successful aging: the impact of resources. Psychology and Aging 12, 433–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkman, L. F.Seeman, T. E., Albert, M. et al. (1993) High, usual and impaired functioning in community-dwelling older men and women: findings from the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Successful Aging. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 46, 1129–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, J. (2003) Labor Market and Labor Policy in Aging Society. Korea Labor Institute, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Chung, H. J. & Suh, B. S. (1997) Individual and intergenerational variables related to psychological well-being of elderly females. Journal of Korean Home Management Association 15(4), 149–164.Google Scholar
Chung, S. D. (2007) A comparative study on the successful ageing for Korean elderly women and elderly men. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society 27(4), 829–845.Google Scholar
Depp, C. A. & Jeste, D. V. (2006) Definitions and predictors of successful aging: A comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 14(1), 6–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, E. S., Merritt, R. K., Health, G. W., Powell, K. E., Washburn, R. A., Kriska, A. & Haile, G. (1991) Physical activity behaviors in lower and higher socioeconomic status populations. American Journal of Epidemiology 133(12), 1246–1256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fried, L. P. & Guralnik, J. M. (1997) Disability in older adults: Evidence regarding significance, etiology, and risk. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 45(1), 92–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gama, E. V., Damian, J., Molino, J. P., Lopez, M. R., Perez, M. L. & Iglesias, G. (2000) Association of individual activities of daily living with self-rated health in older people. Age and Aging 29, 267–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garfein, A. J. & Herzog, A. (1995) Robust aging among the young-old, old-old, and oldest-old. Journal of Gerontology 50B, S77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundy, E. & Holt, G. (2001) The socioeconomic status of older adults: How should we measure it in studies of health inequalities? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 55, 895–904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herd, P., Goesling, B. & House, J. S. (2007) Socioeconomic position and health: The differential effects of education versus income on the onset versus progression of health problems. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 48, 223–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herzog, A. R. & Morgan, J. N. (1992) Age and gender differences in the value of productive activities: Four different approaches. Research on Aging 14, 169–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jang, S. N., Choi, Y. J. & Kim, D. H. (2009a) Association of socioeconomic status with successful ageing: Differences in the components of successful ageing. Journal of Biosocial Science 41(2), 207–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jang, S. N. et al. (2009b) Employment status and depressive symptoms in Koreans: Results from a baseline survey of the Korean longitudinal study of aging. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, S. J. (2005) The Labor Market in Korea: Enhancing Flexibility and Raising Participation. Economic Department Working Papers. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, No. 469.Google Scholar
Jorm, A. F., Christiansen, H., Henderson, S. et al. (1998) Factors associated with successful aging. Australian Journal of Aging 17, 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (2006) National Elderly Life Conditions and Welfare Need Survey, 2005. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Korea National Statistical Office (2006) Statistics for the Elderly. Korea National Statistical Office, Daejeon, Korea.Google Scholar
Korea National Statistical Office (2007a) The Aged Statistics, 2006. Korea National Statistical Office, Daejeon, Korea.Google Scholar
Korea National Statistical Office (2007b) Population Projections for Korea: 2005–2050, Based on the 2005 Census. Korea National Statistical Office, Daejeon, Korea.Google Scholar
Kubzansky, L. D., Berkman, L. F., Glass, T. A. & Seeman, T. E. (1998) Is educational attainment associated with shared determinants of health in the elderly? Findings from the MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging. Psychosomatic Medicine 60(5), 578–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamb, V. & Myers, G. (1999) A comparative study of successful aging in three Asian countries. Population Research and Policy Review 18, 433–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, A. B., Arnold, A. M., Naydect, B. I. et al. (2003) Successful aging: Effect of subclinical cardiovascular disease. Archive of International Medicine 163, 2315–2322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roos, N. P. & Havens, B. (1991) Predictors of successful ageing: a twelve-year study of Manitoba elderly. American Journal of Public Health 81, 63–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothenberg, R., Lentzner, H. R. & Parker, R. A. (1991) Population aging patterns: The expansion of mortality. Journal of Gerontology 46(2), 566–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, J. W. & Kahn, R. L. (1997) Successful aging. Gerontologist 37(4), 433–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seeman, T. E., Charpentier, P. A., Berkman, L. F., Tinetti, M. E., Guralnik, J. M., Albert, M., Blazer, D. & Rowe, J. W. (1994) Predicting changes in physical performance in a high functioning elderly cohort: MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging. Journal of Gerontology 49(3), M97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawbridge, W. J., Cohen, R. D., Shema, S. J. & Kaplan, G. A. (1996) Successful aging: Predictors and associated activities. American Journal of Epidemiology 144(2), 135–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strawbridge, W. J., Wallhagen, M. I. & Cohen, R. D. (2002) Successful aging and well-being: Self-rated compared with Rowe and Kahn. Gerontologist 42, 727–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuck, A. E., Walthert, J. M., Nikolas, T., Bula, C. J., Hohmann, C. & Beck, J. C. (1999) Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: A systematic literature review. Social Science and Medicine 48(4), 445–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilcox, S., Castro, C., King, A. C., Housemann, R. & Brownson, R. C. (2000) Determinants of leisure time physical activity in rural compared with urban older and ethnically diverse women in the United States. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 54, 667–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Won, C. W. (2002) Korea activities of daily living scales and Korea instrumental activities of daily living scale. Korean Journal of Geriatric Society 6(1), 1–11.Google Scholar