Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:51:31.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A field study of the choice and continuity of use of three contraceptive methods in a rural area of Thailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

A. Somboonsuk ,
N. Xuto ,
R. H. Gray  and
R. A. Grossman
A. Somboonsuk
Affiliation:
WHO Research Team for the Evaluation of Fertility Regulating Methods, Chulalongkorn Hospital Medical School, Rama IV Road, Bangkok, Thailand
N. Xuto
Affiliation:
WHO Research Team for the Evaluation of Fertility Regulating Methods, Chulalongkorn Hospital Medical School, Rama IV Road, Bangkok, Thailand
R. H. Gray
Affiliation:
WHO Research Team for the Evaluation of Fertility Regulating Methods, Chulalongkorn Hospital Medical School, Rama IV Road, Bangkok, Thailand
R. A. Grossman
Affiliation:
WHO Research Team for the Evaluation of Fertility Regulating Methods, Chulalongkorn Hospital Medical School, Rama IV Road, Bangkok, Thailand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The present study was designed to assess the preference for and the continuation rates achieved with two previously available contraceptives (the pill and the IUD), and one newly introduced method (depomedroxypro-gesterone acetate, or DMPA), in a rural area of Thailand. After the presentation of balanced educational material on the three contraceptives, women were offered a free choice of method. It was found that 73·8% of all women adopted DMPA as their method of choice, and that this preference was not influenced by the educational lecture. In contrast, 16·9% of women chose the pill and 9·3% chose the IUD. The injection was perceived as a convenient method when compared to the other routes of administration, but the dominant preference for DMPA appeared to be largely due to ill-defined personal factors and the influence of friends. The 1-year life-table continuation rates with DMPA (75·5 per 100 women) were significantly higher than the continuation rate achieved with the IUD in this rural population (66·5 per 100 women). The continuation rates with the pill were 72 per 100 women, but the excessively high loss to follow-up with this method made the interpretation of the results difficult. It is suggested that if women are offered a free choice of contraceptive methods under a quasi experimental situation, useful information can be obtained on the potential value of new methods for an on-going family planning programme.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , April 1978 , pp. 209 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azen, S.P., Roy, S., Pike, M.C. & Casagrande, J. (1976) Some suggested improvements to current statistical methods of analysing contraceptive efficacy. J. Chron. Dis. 29, 649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benagiano, G., Diczfalusy, E., Goldzieher, J.W. & Gray, R.H. (1977) Multinational comparative clinical evaluation of two long-acting injectable contraceptive steroids: norethisterone oenanthate and medroxy progesterone acetate. 1. Use-effectiveness. Contraception, 15, 5.Google Scholar
Buchanan, R. (1975) Breast Feeding: an Aid to Infant Health and Fertility Control. Population Reports, Series J, No. 4, p. 49. George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.Google ScholarPubMed
Donaldson, P., Satayapan, S., Suvanavejh, C. & Wright, N.H. (1976) Continuation of Oral Contraceptive Practice in Thailand: the 1974 Follow Up Survey. Research and Evaluation Unit, National Family Planning Programme, Ministry of Health, Bangkok.Google Scholar
Knodel, J. & Piampiti, S. (1977) Response reliability in a longitudinal survey in Thailand. Stud. Fam. Plann. 8, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koetsawang, S., Srisuphandit, S., Srivanaboon, S., Bhiraleus, P., Rachawat, D., Kiriwat, O. & Koetsawang, A. (1974) Intra-muscular depomedroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. J. med. Ass. Thailand, 57, 396.Google Scholar
McCormick Hospital (1977) Family Planning Department Report (mimeo). McCormick Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand.Google Scholar
Pardthaisong, T., McDaniel, E.B., & Gray, R.H. (1975) Acceptance and use of Depo Provera in Chiang Mai. IPPF med. Bull. 9, 1.Google Scholar
Somboonsuk, A., Chiawcharnwit, T., Onthuam, Y., Chaudhury, R., Fuchs, F. & Grossman, R. (1975) Randomised comparative trial of three IUDs in rural Thailand; preliminary report of first twelve month follow-up. In: Analysis of Intra-uterine Contraception, p. 199. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intra-uterine Contraception. Edited by Hefnawi, F. and Segal, J.S.. North-Holland Publishing Company,Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Thai National Family Planning Programme (1976) Distribution of new acceptors by method, organization and region (1975–76). In: TNFPP Annual Report. Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
Tietze, C. & Lewit, S. (1973) Recommended procedures for the statistical evaluation of intrauterine contraception. Stud. Fam. Plann. 4, 35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, N.H. (1976) Programme Issues Related to the Introduction of Depo Provera in the Thailand National Family Planning Program. Paper for the Scientific Group on Research on the Programme Implications of Fertility Regulating Methods, HRP/SG/PI/76.15. WHO, Geneva.Google Scholar