Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:28:13.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Family size and social class in nineteenth century Tasmania, Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

M. Kosten  and
R. J. Mitchell
M. Kosten
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Human Variation, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
R. J. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Human Variation, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Data on fertility in a white Australian population based upon the vital records of the nineteenth century for two districts in Tasmania are presented. Mean family size was apparently low (3·2) and reproductive period short. However, when allowance was made for the truncation of birth records of migrant families, family size increased (4·9) markedly. Social class is shown to have a consistent effect on fertility levels in the larger community with low fertility associated with inferior economic status. Owing to the paucity of information contained within the vital records, it was impossible to investigate either age structure or migration effects on fertility. There is also evidence to suggest inbreeding is associated with higher, not lower, fertility.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , January 1984 , pp. 55 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, A. (1978) Population structure in the Western Pyrenees: social class, migration and the frequency of consanguineous marriage, 1850 to 1910. Ann. hum. Biol. 5, 165.Google Scholar
Abelson, A. (1979) Population structure in the Western Pyrenees: I. Population density, social class composition, and migration 1850–1915. J. biosoc. Sci. 11, 353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abelson, A. (1980) Population structure in the Western Pyrenees: II. Migration, the frequency of consanguineous marriage and inbreeding, 1877 to 1915. J. biosoc. Sci. 12, 93Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. & Bodmer, W.F. (1971) The Genetics of Human Populations. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Crow, J.F. & Mange, A.P. (1965) Measurement of inbreeding from the frequency of marriages between persons of the same surname. Eugen. Q. 12, 199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobson, T. (1973) Historical population structure in Northumberland. In: Genetic Variation in Britain, pp. 67–82. Edited by Roberts, D. F. and Sunderland, E.. Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
Harrison, G.A., Hiorns, R.W. & Küchemann, C.F. (1970) Social class relatedness in some Oxfordshire populations. J. biosoc. Sci. 2, 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, G.A., Hiorns, R.W. & Küchemann, C.F. (1971) Social class and marriage patterns in some Oxfordshire populations. J. biosoc. Sci. 3, 1.Google Scholar
Kosten, M. (1981). The Population Structure of Two Colonial Tasmanian Districts. Honours thesis, Department of Genetics and Human Variation, La Trobe University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Kosten, M., Williams, J. & Mitchell, R.J. (1983) Historical population structure of two Tasmanian communities using surname analyses. J. biosoc. Sci. 15, 367.Google Scholar
Küchemann, C.F., Boyce, A.F. & Harrison, G.A. (1967) A demographic and genetic study of a group of Oxfordshire villages. Hum. Biol. 39, 251.Google Scholar
Reynolds, H. (1969) ‘Men of substance and deservedly good repute’: the Tasmanian gentry 1856–1875. Aust. J. polit. Hist. 25, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D.F. (1968) Genetic effects of population size reduction. Nature, Lond. 22, 1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skolnick, M.H. (1974) The Construction and Analysis of Genealogies from Parish Registers with a Case Study of Parma Valley, Italy. PhD thesis, Stanford University, California.Google Scholar
Steel, D.J. (1968) National Index of Parish Registers I. Society of Genealogists, London.Google Scholar
Swedlund, A.C. (1971) The Genetical Structure of an Historical Population: A Study of Marriage and Fertility in Old Deerfield, Massachusetts. Research Reports in Anthropology 7. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Swedlund, A.C., Meindl, R.S. & Gradie, M.I. (1980) Family reconstitution in the Connecticut Valley: progress on record linkage and the mortality survey. In: Genealogical Demography, pp. 139–155. Edited by Dyke, B. and Morrill, W. T., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E.A. (1966) Family limitation in pre-industrial England. Econ Hist. Rev. 19, 82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed