Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:55:50.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emerging patterns of child-spacing in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

A. Rahim  and
B. Ram
A. Rahim
Affiliation:
Demography Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa
B. Ram
Affiliation:
Demography Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This study used data from the 1984 Family History Survey conducted by Statistics Canada to examine recent trends and patterns of child-spacing among currently married women. Life table and proportional hazards estimates show that Canadian women, particularly those in younger age groups with higher education and longer work experience, start having children late, but have subsequent children rather quickly. This suggests that such women tend to complete childbearing within a compressed time period.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , April 1993 , pp. 155 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balakrishnan, T. R. & Krotki, K. J. (1985) Contraceptive use in Canada, 1984. Fam. Plan. Perspect. 17, 209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bumpass, L. L. & Sweet, J. A. (1980) Patterns of Employment Before and After Childbirth. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 23, No. 4. US Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville.Google ScholarPubMed
Burch, T. K. (1985) Family History Survey: Preliminary Findings. Statistics Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Fernando, R., Balakrishnan, T. R. & Chen, J. (1990) Changes in timing of fertility—a Canadian experience. J. biosoc. Sci. 22, 33.Google Scholar
Ford, K. (1984) Timing and Spacing of Births. Comparative Studies No. 38. International Statistical Institute, Voorburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Freedman, R. & Coombs, L. (1966) Economic considerations in family growth decisions. Popul. Stud. 35, 161.Google Scholar
Grindstaff, C. F. (1984) Catching up: the fertility of women over 30 years of age, Canada in the 1970s and early 1980s. Can. Stud. Popul. 11, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loh, S. & Ram, B. (1990) Delayed childbearing in Canada: trends and factors. Genus, 46, 147.Google ScholarPubMed
Ni Bhrolchain, M. (1985) Birth intervals and women’s economic activity. J. biosoc. Sci 17, 31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ni Bhrolchain, M. (1986) The interpretation and role of work-associated accelerated childspacing in post-war Britain. Eur. J. Popul. 2, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ram, B. (1990) New Trends in the Family, Demographic Facts and Features. Statistics Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Rao, K. V. (1987) Childlessness in Ontario and Quebec: results from 1971 and 1981 Census data. Can. Stud. Popul. 14, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, K. V. & Balakrishnan, T.R. (1989) Timing of first birth and second birth spacing in Canada. J. biosoc. Sci. 21, 293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, P. (1987) Women’s Work Interruptions. Results from the 1984 Family History Survey. Statistics Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, G. & Hobcraft, J.N. (1980) Illustrative Analysis: Life Table Analysis of Birth Intervals in Colombia. Scientific Reports, International Statistical Institute, London.Google Scholar
Ryder, N.B. (1980) Components of temporal variations in American fertility. In: Demographic Patterns in Developed Societies (Symposium 19 of the Society for the Study of Human Biology). Edited by Hiorns, R. W. Taylor & Francis, London.Google Scholar
Singh, S. & Wulf, D. (1991) Today’s Adolescents, Tomorrow’s Parents: A Portrait of the Americas. Alan Guttmacher Institute, New York.Google Scholar
Wineberg, H. & McCarthy, J. (1989) Childspacing in the United States: Recent trends and Differentials. J. Marr. & Fam. 51, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar