Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:42:58.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of family sex composition on fertility preference and behaviour in rural Bangladesh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

A. I. Chowdhury ,
Radheshyam Bairagi  and
Michael A. Koenig
A. I. Chowdhury
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Radheshyam Bairagi
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Michael A. Koenig
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of family sex composition on fertility preferences and behaviour during the period 1977–88 are examined using longitudinal data from Matlab, Bangladesh. The sex composition of living children was found to be systematically related to fertility preferences and behaviour, with a higher number of sons at each family size associated with a higher percentage of women wanting no more children, a higher percentage currently using contraception, and lower subsequent fertility. However, the highest percentage wanting no more children, using contraception and having lowest subsequent fertility was found among women who already had one daughter as well as at least one son. The effects of sex preference on fertility preferences and behaviour were measured using an index developed by Arnold (1985). The results suggest that while sex preference remained largely unchanged during the study period, its effect on contraceptive use declined and its impact on actual fertility remained modest and fairly stable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , October 1993 , pp. 455 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © 1993, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, N. R. (1981) Family size and sex preferences among women in rural Bangladesh. Stud. Fam. Plann. 12, 100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, F. (1985) Measuring the effect of sex preference on fertility: the case of Korea. Demography, 22, 280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, F. (1987) The Effect of Sex Preference on Fertility and Family Planning: Empirical Evidence. Population Bulletin Nos 23–24. United Nations, New York.Google ScholarPubMed
Bairagi, R. & Langsten, R. L. (1986) Sex preference for children and its implications for fertility in rural Bangladesh. Stud. Fam. Plann. 17, 302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bairagi, R. & Bhattacharya, A. K. (1989) Effects of parental sex preference on fertility intentions and contraceptive use in Calcutta. Rural Demography, 16, 43.Google ScholarPubMed
Bhatia, S., Faruque, A. S. G. & Chakraborty, J. (1980) The Matlab Family Planning Health Services Project. Stud. Fam. Plann. 11, 202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cain, M. (1982) Perspective on family and fertility in developing countries. Popul. Stud. 36, 159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cholera Research Laboratory (1978) The Matlab Demographic Surveillance System. Scientific Report No. 9. CRL, Dhaka, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, M. K. & Bairagi, R. (1990) Son preference and fertility in Bangladesh. Popul. Dev. Rev. 16, 749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleland, J., Verrall, J. & Vaessen, M. (1983) Preference for the Sex of Children and Their Influence on Reproductive Behavior. World Fertility Survey Comparative Studies No. 27. International Statistical Insitute, Voorburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Coombs, L. C. (1979) Prospective fertility and underlying preferences: a longitudinal study in Taiwan. Popul. Stud. 33, 447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Degraff, D. S., Phillips, J. F., Simmons, R. & Chakraborty, J. (1986) Integrating health services into an MCH-FP program in Matlab, Bangladesh: an analytical update. Stud. Fam. Plann. 17, 228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeTray, D. (1984) Son preference in Pakistan: an analysis of intentions vs. behavior. Res. Popul. Econ. 5, 185.Google Scholar
Mason, K. O. (1984) The Status of Women, Fertility and Mortality: A Review of Interrelationships. Population Studies Research Report, No. 84–58. University of Michigan Population Studies Center, Ann Arbor, USA.Google Scholar
Park, C. B. (1983) Preference for sons, family size and sex ratio: an empirical study in Korea. Demography, 20, 333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, J. F. Simmons, R., Chakraborty, J. & Chowdhury, A. I. (1984) Integrating health services into an MCH-FP program: lesson from Matlab, Bangladesh. Stud. Fam. Plann. 15, 153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repetto, R. (1972) Son preference and fertility behavior in developing countries. Stud. Fam. Plann. 3, 70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheps, M. C. (1963) Effects on family size and sex ratio of preferences regarding the sex of children. Popul. Stud. 17, 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar