Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:51:52.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does women's literacy affect desired fertility and contraceptive use in rural–urban Pakistan?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Khalida P. Zaki  and
Nan E. Johnson
Khalida P. Zaki
Affiliation:
Social Science Center for Integrative Studies
Nan E. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The 1984–85 Pakistan Contraceptive Prevalence Survey showed that urban wives had more than twice the literacy rate of rural wives. The present study explored the relationship of the rural–urban gap in female literacy to differences in contraceptive use. In rural areas, literacy did not increase women's perceptions of having reached a ‘sufficient’ number of living children, although the opposite was true for urban areas. Yet rural women with an ‘insufficient’ number of living children were more likely to use contraception if they were literate, as did their urban counterparts. Thus, raising the literacy rate in rural Pakistan would not narrow the rural–urban gap in contraception to cease childbearing but would narrow the rural–urban gap in contraception used to space wanted births further apart. Recommendations for government policy are made.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , October 1993 , pp. 445 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © 1993, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, J. H. & Nelson, F. D. (1984) Linear Probability Logit and Probit Models. Sage, Beverly Hills, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, J. C. (1980) Mass education as a determinant of the timing of fertility decline. Popul. Dev. Rev. 6, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, J. C. (1981) The mechanisms of demographic change in historical perspective. Popul. Stud. 35, 5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cochrane, S. H. (1979) Fertility and Education: What do We Really Know? World Bank Occasional Papers No. 26. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Easterlin, R. A. (1975) An economic framework of fertility analysis. Stud. Fam. Plann. 6, 54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fienberg, S. E. (1985) The Analysis of Cross-classified Categorical Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Population Wellfare Division of Pakistan (1986) Contraceptive Prevalence Survey (PCPS) 1984–85. Ministry of Planning and Development, Islamabad.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. C. (1978) Family planning in Pakistan 1955–77. Pakistan Dev. Rev. 27, 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarmad, K., Hussain, K. & Zahid, G. M. (1988) Investment and inequality in Pakistan's education sector. Pakistan Dev. Rev. 27, 677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsang, M. & Zaki, M. J. A. (1989) Household Expenditures and Other Alternatives for Financing Primary Education in Pakistan. College of Education, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Zaki, K. P. (1991) The Rural–Urban Differences in Contraceptive Use in Pakistan: The Effects of Women's Literacy and Desired Fertility. PhD thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar