Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:46:28.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOMETRIC TESTING OF AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE WOMEN’S PERCEPTIONS OF UNPLANNED PREGNANCY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2018

Eesa Mohammadi ,
Roghaiyeh Nourizadeh ,
Masoumeh Simbar ,
Ahmad Reza Baghestani  and
Nicole Rohana
Eesa Mohammadi
Affiliation:
Nursing Department, Medical Sciences Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Roghaiyeh Nourizadeh*
Affiliation:
Midwifery Department, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Masoumeh Simbar
Affiliation:
Midwifery and Reproductive Health Department, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Ahmad Reza Baghestani
Affiliation:
Biostatistics Department, Paramedical Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran
Nicole Rohana
Affiliation:
School of Nursing Programs, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A woman’s decision to continue or terminate an unplanned pregnancy is affected by a broad range of contextual and cognitive factors. The identification of women’s perceptions of unplanned pregnancy is crucial for health care providers to be able to offer supportive care and counselling. The aim of this study was to develop an instrument to accurately measure women’s perceptions of unplanned pregnancy: the Women’s Perceptions of Unplanned Pregnancy Questionnaire. The instrument was developed using a methodological framework guided by Waltz et al. (2010). A conceptual model of the designed instrument emerged from the qualitative study using a content analysis approach conducted in Tabriz, Iran. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling method between June 2016 and July 2017. Participants were a sample of married Iranian women between the ages of 15 and 49 who had experienced an unplanned pregnancy, either unwanted or mistimed, within the last 3 months. Women with an established diagnosis of a psychological disorder were excluded from the study. The psychometric properties of the instrument were assessed using face, content, concurrent and construct validations. To evaluate face validity, qualitative and quantitative (item impact score) methods were used. The content validity was assessed by fifteen panel experts. In addition, concurrent validity of the designed instrument was tested using the Persian version of the Cambridge Worry Scale and the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. The construct validity was calculated by using the exploratory factor analysis method. Data were collected from questionnaires completed by 310 eligible women. Analysis of the data using exploratory factor analysis yielded 31 items in a unique six-factor structure. The instrument was found to have high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.88) and adequate reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient=0.89). A clearer understanding of women’s perceptions of unplanned pregnancy may enhance reproductive services and interventions.

Keywords

Unplanned pregnancyAbortionPerception
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , May 2019 , pp. 394 - 402
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aday, L Cornelius, L (2006) Designing and Conducting Health Surveys: A Comprehensive Guide. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Erfani, A (2011) Induced abortion in Tehran, Iran: estimated rates and correlates. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 37, 134–142.Google Scholar
Finer, LB, Frohwirth, LF, Dauphinee, LA, Singh, S Moore, AM (2005) Reasons U.S. women have abortions: quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 37, 110–118.Google Scholar
Green, JM, Kafetsios, K, Statham, HE Snowdon, CM (2003) Factor structure, validity and reliability of the Cambridge Worry Scale in a pregnant population. Journal of Health Psychology 8, 753–764.Google Scholar
Huizink, AC, Delforterie, MJ, Scheinin, NM, Tolvanen, M, Karlsson, L Karlsson, H (2016) Adaption of pregnancy anxiety questionnaire-revised for all pregnant women regardless of parity: PRAQ-R2. Archives of Women’s Mental Health 19, 125–132.10.1007/s00737-015-0531-2Google Scholar
Juniper, EF, Guyott, GH, Streiner, DL King, DR (1997) Clinical impact versus factor analysis for quality of life questionnaire construction. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 50, 233–238.Google Scholar
Lawshe, CH (1975) A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology 28, 563–575.Google Scholar
Mohammadi, E, Nourizadeh, R Simbar, M (2015) Iranian Azeri women’s perceptions of unplanned pregnancy: a qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research 20, 255–262.Google Scholar
Mortazavi, F Akaberi, A (2016) Worries of pregnant women: testing the Farsi Cambridge Worry Scale. Scientifica. doi:10.1155/2016/5791560Google Scholar
Munro, BH (2006) Statistical Methods for Health Care Research. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Navidpour, F, Dolatian, M, Shishehgar, S, Yaghmaei, F, Alavi Majd, H Hashemi, SS (2016) Validating the Farsi version of the Pregnancy Worries and Stress Questionnaire (PWSQ): an exploratory factor analysis. Electron Physician 8, 3132–3137.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J (1978) Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Pallant, J (2007) SPSS Survival Manual: A Step By Step Guide to Analysis Using SPSS. Allen and Unwin, Crows Nest, NSW.Google Scholar
Polis, CB, Bradley, SEK, Bankole, A, Onda, T, Croft, T Singh, S (2016) Contraceptive Failure Rates in the Developing World: An Analysis of Demographic and Health Survey Data in 43 Countries. Guttmacher Institute, New York.Google Scholar
Polit, DF Beck, CT (2010) Essentials of Nursing Research Methods, Appraisal and Utilization. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Polit, DF, Beck, CT Owan, SV (2007) Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health 30, 459–467.Google Scholar
Pop, VJM, Pommer, AM, Pop-Purceleanu, M, Wijnen, HAA, Bergink, V Pouwer, F (2011) Development of the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale: the TPDS. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 11, 80.Google Scholar
Santelli, JS, Speizer, IS, Avery, A Kendall, C (2006) An exploration of the dimensions of pregnancy intentions among women choosing to terminate pregnancy or to initiate prenatal care in New Orleans, Louisiana. American Journal of Public Health 96, 2009–2015.Google Scholar
Sedgh, G, Singh, S Hussain, R (2014) Intended and unplanned pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Studies in Family Planning 45, 301–314.10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00393.xGoogle Scholar
Spielberger, C, Gorsuch, R, Lushene, R, Vagg, P Jacobs, G (1983) Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, California.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, BG Fidell, LS (2007) Principal Components and Factor Analysis Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon, Boston MA.Google Scholar
Tilahun, F, Dadi, AF Shiferaw, G (2017) Determinants of abortion among clients coming for abortion service at Felegehiwot referral hospital, northwest Ethiopia: a case control study. Contraception and Reproductive Medicine 2, 11, doi: 10.1186/s40834-017-0038-5.Google Scholar
Waltz, CF, Strickland, OL Lenz, ER (2010) Measurement in Nursing and Health Research. Springer, New York.Google Scholar