Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:15:48.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DETERMINANTS OF TERRITORIAL EXOGAMY IN FRIULI (NORTH-EAST ITALY) IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2011

ALESSIO FORNASIN
ALESSIO FORNASIN
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Udine, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics of individuals who formed exogamic marriages in the Friuli region (north-east Italy) during the second half of the 19th century. Logistic regression models were devised to measure the influence of the determinants of exogamic marriage, taking into account not only variables related to context but also spouses' economic, social and cultural characteristics. The determinants of exogamic marriage differ for men and women, and also vary by region due to differences in geographical mobility and size of the marriage market. The majority of exogamic spouses belong to one of two categories: either older individuals, often, especially in the case of men, with a previous marriage; or the upper social classes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , July 2011 , pp. 453 - 467
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boëtsch, G., Prost, M. & Rabino-Massa, E. (2002) Evolution of consanguinity in a French alpine valley: the Vallouise in the Briançon region (17th–19th centuries). Human Biology 74, 285–300.Google Scholar
Bossard, J. H. S. (1932) Residential propinquity as a factor in marriage selection. American Journal of Sociology 38, 219–224.Google Scholar
Bozon, M. & Heran, F. (1989) Finding a spouse: a survey of how French couples meet. Population: An English Selection 44, 91–121.Google Scholar
Brändström, A., Sundin, J. & Tedebrand, L-G. (2000) Two cities. Urban migration and settlement in nineteenth-century Sweden. History of the Family 5, 415–429.Google Scholar
Bras, H., Van Poppel, F. & Mandemakers, K. (2009) Relatives as spouses. Preferences and opportunities for kin marriage in a western society. American Journal of Human Biology 21, 793–804.Google Scholar
Breschi, M., Fornasin, A., Manfredini, M. & Zacchigna, M. (2009) Family composition and remarriage in pre-transitional Italy: a comparative study. European Journal of Population 25, 277–296.Google Scholar
Breschi, M., Pozzi, L. & Rettaroli, R. (1994) Analogie e differenze nella crescita della popolazione italiana, 1750–1911. Bollettino di Demografia Storica 20, 41–94.Google Scholar
Bull, H. H. (2005) Deciding whom to marry in a rural two-class society: social homogamy and constraints in the marriage market in Rendalen, Norway, 1750–1900. International Review of Social History 50, 43–63.Google Scholar
Coleman, D. A. & Haskey, J. C. (1986) Marital distance and its geographical orientation in England and Wales, 1979. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 11, 337–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corsini, C. A. (1981) Why is remarriage a male affair? Some evidences from Tuscan villages during the eighteenth century. In Dupaquier, J., Hélin, E., Laslett, P., Livi Bacci, M. & Segner, E. (eds) Marriage and Remarriage in Populations of the Past. Academic Press, London, pp. 385–396.Google Scholar
Cosattini, G. (1983) L'emigrazione temporanea del Friuli. Regione Friuli Venezia Giulia, Trieste.Google Scholar
Danubio, M. E. & Amicone, E. (2001) Biodemographic study of a central Apennine area (Italy) in the 19th and 20th centuries: marriage seasonality and reproductive isolation. Journal of Biosocial Science 33, 427–449.Google Scholar
Danubio, M. E. & Pettener, D. (1997) Marital structure of the Italian community of Boston, Massachusetts, 1880–1920. Journal of Biosocial Science 29, 257–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delille, G. (1985) Famille et propriété dans le Royaume de Naples (XVe–XIXe siècle), École Française de Rome. Éditions de l'École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Rome, Paris.Google Scholar
Derosas, R., Breschi, M., Fornasin, A., Manfredini, M. & Munno, C. (in press) Between Constraints and Coercion: Marriage and Social Reproduction in Northern and Central Italy. URL: http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/browse/browse.asp?btype=6&serid=145Google Scholar
Dribe, M. & Lundh, C. (2005) Finding the right partner: rural homogamy in nineteenth-century Sweden. International Review of Social History 50, 149–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferigo, G. (2002) Dire per lettera… Alfabetizzazione, mobilità, scritture popolari dalla montagna friulana. Metodi e ricerche 21(2), 3–57.Google Scholar
Fornasin, A. (1998) Emigrazioni e mestieri in Carnia: la cesura del XIX secolo. In Alto 80, 19–40.Google Scholar
Fornasin, A. & Marzona, A. (2009) Exogamy and marital propinquity in 19th century northeast Italy. Historical Geography 37, 138–158.Google Scholar
Fuster, V. & Colantonio, S. (2004) Socioeconomic, demographic, and geographic variables affecting the diverse degrees of consanguineous marriages in Spain. Human Biology 76, 1–14.Google Scholar
Goody, J. R. (1983) The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueresi, P., Pettener, D. & Martuzzi Veronesi, F. (2001) Marriage behaviour in the Alpine Non Valley from 1825 to 1923. Annals of Human Biology 28, 157–171.Google Scholar
Haandrikman, K., Harmsen, C., van Wissen, L. J. G. & Hutter, I. (2008) Geography matters: patterns of spatial homogamy in the Netherlands. Population, Space and Place 14, 387–405.Google Scholar
Hanaki, N. & Kurosu, S. (2010) Marriage relationships among households in the mid 19th century Tama, Japan. Socioeconomic homogamy, geographical endogamy and kinship networks. History of the Family 15, 333–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heady, P. (1999) The Hard People. Rivalry, Sympathy and Social Structure in an Alpine Valley. Harwood, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hollingshead, A. B. (1950) Cultural factors in the selection of marriage mates. American Sociological Review 15, 619–627.Google Scholar
Kalmijn, M. (1998) Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology 24, 395–421.Google Scholar
Katz, A. M. & Hill, R. (1958) Residential propinquity and marital selection: a review of theory, method, and fact. Marriage and Family Living 20, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kertzer, D. I. & Sigle, W. (1998) The marriage of female foundlings in nineteenth-century Italy. Continuity and Change 13, 201–220.Google Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, C. (1985) The “Mattinata” in medieval Italy. In Klapisch-Zuber, C. (ed.) Women, Family, and Ritual in Renaissance Italy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, pp. 261–282.Google Scholar
Küchemann, C. F., Harrison, G. A., Hiorns, R. W. & Carrivick, P. J. (1974) Social class and marital distance in Oxford City. Annals of Human Biology 1, 13–27.Google Scholar
Le Goff, J. & Schmitt, J-C. (eds) (1981) Le charivari. EHESS, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, G. (1985) L'eredità immateriale. Carriera di un esorcista nel Piemonte del Seicento. Einaudi, Torino.Google Scholar
Lorenzetti, L. (2003) Economic opening and society endogamy: migratory and reproduction logic in the Insubric mountains (18th and 19th centuries). History of the Family 8, 297–316.Google Scholar
McFarland, D. D. (1970) Effects of group size on the availability of marriage partners. Demography 7, 411–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manfredini, M. (2009) Mechanisms and microevolutionary consequences of social homogamy in a 19th century Italian community. Human Biology 81, 89–95.Google Scholar
Manfredini, M. & Breschi, M. (2008) Marriage and the kin network: evidence from a 19th century Italian community. In Bengtsson, T. & Mineau, G. (eds) Kinship and Demographic Behaviours. Springer, Berlin, pp. 15–36.Google Scholar
Marzona, A. & Fornasin, A. (2007) L'anagrafe informatica delle famiglie friulane costruita sulla base delle fonti presenti presso l'Archivio di Stato di Udine. Archivi & Computer 2–3, 172–198.Google Scholar
Merzario, R. (1981) Il paese stretto. Strategie matrimoniali nella diocesi di Como secoli XVI-XVIII. Einaudi, Torino.Google Scholar
Mitterauer, M. & Sieder, R. (1982) The European Family: Patriarchy to Partnership from the Middle Ages to the Present. Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Moretto, S. (1991) Le statistiche italiane dello stato civile dal 1862 al 1930. Bollettino di Demografia Storica 14, 51–71.Google Scholar
Nicolosio Ciceri, A. (2002) Tradizioni popolari in Friuli. Chiandetti, Reana del Rojale.Google Scholar
Pettener, D. (1985) Consanguineous marriages in the upper Bologna Appennine (1565–1980): microgeographic variations, pedigree structure and correlation of inbreeding secular trend with changes in population size. Human Biology 57, 267–288.Google Scholar
Prost, M. & Boëtsch, G. (2005) Biodémographie et migrations matrimoniales dans l'ecosysteme Alpin. Les populations montagnardes des Massifs du Dauphiné du 16e au 19e siècle. Antropo 10, 1–18.Google Scholar
Pullum, T. W. & Peri, A. (1999) A multivariate analysis of homogamy in Montevideo, Uruguay. Population Studies 53, 361–377.Google Scholar
Rabino-Massa, E., Prost, M. & Boëtsch, G. (2005) Social structure and consanguinity in a French mountain population (1550–1849). Human Biology 77, 201–212.Google Scholar
Riegler, A., Marroni, F., Pattaro, C., Gueresi, P. & Pramstaller, P. P. (2008) Isolation and marriage patterns in four South Tyrolean villages (Italy) during the nineteenth century. Journal of Biosocial Science 40, 787–791.Google Scholar
Serio, N. (2002) La popolazione del Friuli: permanenze e mutamenti (secc. XVIII–XIX). In Del Panta, L., Pozzi, L., Rettaroli, R. & Sonnino, E. (eds) Dinamiche di popolazione, mobilità e territorio in Italia. Secoli XVII–XX. Forum, Udine, pp. 43–60.Google Scholar
Shorter, E. (1975) The Making of the Modern Family. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Van de Putte, B. (2003) Homogamy by geographical origin: segregation in nineteenth-century Flemish cities (Gent, Leuven, and Aalst). Journal of Family History 28, 364–390.Google Scholar
Van de Putte, B., Neven, M. & Oris, M. (2007) Societal openness during the urban crisis. Partner selection in the 19th-century Belgian textile cities Ghent and Verviers. History of the Family 12, 62–78.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, M. H. D., Maas, I. & Miles, A. (2002) HISCO. Historical International Standard Classification of Occupations. Leuven University Press, Leuven.Google Scholar
Van Poppel, F. & Nelissen, J. (1999) The proper age to marry: social norms and behavior in nineteenth-century Netherlands. History of the Family 4, 51–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wall, R. (1996) Marriage, residence and occupational choices of senior and junior siblings in the English past. History of the Family 1, 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar