Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:08:21.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determinants of child-bearing intentions of low-income women: attitudes versus life circumstances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Stephen E. Radecki  and
Linda J. Beckman
Stephen E. Radecki
Affiliation:
Memorial Family Medicine, Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, California
Linda J. Beckman
Affiliation:
California School of Professional Psychology, Los Angeles, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Surveys of low-income women in Los Angeles County in 1985 and 1986 were used to examine the relative impact of child-bearing motivations versus life circumstances on the intention to have a(nother) child. Future child-bearing intentions are strongly related to current parity level regardless of marital status, race/ethnicity or economic status. Psychological motivating factors predict child-bearing intentions of nulliparous women, but not those of parous women. Multivariate analyses showed that motivation for parenthood and life circumstances combined predicted women's child-bearing intentions 88·6% of the time for nulliparous women, but 73·7% for parous women. These findings suggest that, in a low-income population, the onset of parenthood reduces the relationship between specific motivations for child-bearing and actual child-bearing intentions, and diminishes the ability to predict child-bearing intentions based on both attitudinal and social/structural factors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 1992 , pp. 157 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beach, L. R., Campbell, F. L. & Townes, B. D. (1979) Subjective expected utility and the prediction of birth-planning decisions. Organ. Behav. hum. Perform. 24, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, L. J. (1978) The relative rewards and costs of parenthood and employment for employed women. Psychol. Women Q, 2, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, L. J. (1982) Measuring the process of fertility decision-making. In: The Childbearing Decision: Fertility Attitudes and Behavior, pp. 73–95. Edited by Fox, G. L.. Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
Beckman, L. J., Aizenberg, R., Forsythe, A. B. & Day, T. (1983) A theoretical analysis of antecedents of young couples' fertility decisions and outcomes. Demography, 20, 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, L. J. & Houser, B. B. (1979) Perceived satisfactions and costs of motherhood and employment among married women. J. Popul. 2, 306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherlin, A. J. (1988) The changing American family and public policy. In: The Changing American Family and Public Policy, pp. 1–29. Edited by Cherlin, A. J.. Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Easterlin, R. A. (1969) Towards a socioeconomic theory of fertility: a survey of research on economic factors in American fertility. In: Fertility and Family Planning: A World View, pp. 127–156. Edited by Behrman, S. J., Corsa, I. & Freedman, R.. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M. (1972) Toward an understanding of family planning behaviors. J. appl. Social Psychol. 2, 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, L. W. & Hoffman, M. L. (1973) The value of children to parents. In: Psychological Perspectives on Population, pp. 19–76. Edited by Fawcett, J. T.. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Hoffman, L. W. & Manis, J. D. (1979) The value of children in the United States; a new approach to the study of fertility. J. Marr. & Fam. 41, 583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, L. W., Thornton, A. & Manis, J. D. (1978) The value of children to parents in the United States. J. Popul. 1, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, G. Y. (1988) Motivational factors in the decision and timing of pregnancy. In: The Transition to Parenthood: Current Theory and Research, pp. 23–61. Edited by Michaels, G. Y. & Goldberg, W. A.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Miller, W. B. (1983) Chance, choice and the future of reproduction. Am. Psychol. 38, 1198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Namboodiri, N. K. (1974) Which couples at given parities expect to have additional births? An exercise in discriminant analysis. Demography, 11, 45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryder, N. B. (1980) Where do babies frome from? In: Sociological Theory and Research: A Critical Appraisal, pp. 189–202. Edited by Blalock, H. M.. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Terhune, K. W. (1972) The rewards and costs of family size: concepts and methods for a pilot study in the United States. In: The Satisfactions and Costs of Children: Theories. Concepts. Methods, pp. 99–140. Edited by Fawcett, J. T.. Proceedings of the Workshop on Assessment of the Satisfactions and Costs of Children. East-West Center, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Townes, B. D., Beach, L. R., Campbell, F. L. & Martin, D. C. (1977) Birth planning values and decisions: the prediction of fertility. J. appl. Social Psychol. 7, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Us Department of Health and Human Services. (1985) Annual Revision of Poverty Income Guidelines. Federal Register 50(46)9517. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Westoff, C. F., Mishler, E. G. & Kelly, E. L. (1957) Preferences in size of family and eventual fertility twenty years after. Am. J. Social. 62, 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar