Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:40:43.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Demographic factors in attitudes towards population growth and control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Larry D. Barnett
Affiliation:
California State College, Los Angeles

Extract

Using two Gallup polls, which together contained three questions on the attitudes of adult Americans towards population growth and control, a multivariate analysis was conducted of the relationship to each question of nine demographic factors: age, city size, education, family income, occupation of the household head, race, region, religion and sex. Only education and religion showed an intrinsic relationship with attitudes. Specifically, the extent of endorsement of the view that the world population growth rate is a serious problem, and of the view that population limitation will, at some time, be necessary, increased with education. Among those whose family income was at least $10,000 and those whose house-hold head was a professional or business executive, Protestants were more likely than Catholics to view US and world population growth rates as serious and to consider population limitation necessary.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1972, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnett, L. (1971) Zero Population Growth, Inc. BioScience, 21, 759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, J. (1966) The Americanization of Catholic reproductive ideals. Popul. Stud. 20, 27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blalock, H.M. (1960) Social Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Gallup Organization (1969) The US Public Considers its Environment. National Wildlife Federation, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Kantner, J. (1968) American attitudes on population policy: recent trends. Stud. Fam. Plann. 30, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M. (1968) The Logic of Survey Analysis. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar