Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:36:57.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Childlessness and Marital Instability: A Re-Examination of the Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Colin Gibson
Colin Gibson
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Bedford College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Earlier studies have queried whether divorce was associated with childlessness. Evidence from surveys of broken marriages passing through the divorce courts of England and Wales indicates that infertility and divorce are not related in the way supposed. When the duration of de facto marriage is controlled, divorcing couples have a higher rate of fertility than that found within those who remain married. The former are also more likely to have a larger family size within the same period of time. Similar findings emerge from data relating to broken marriages resorting to the magistrates' courts. These results are partly a consequence of the trend whereby working-class marriages—with their earlier start of a family and larger completed family size—form an increasing proportion of all divorcing couples.

Survey results showed that within a divorcing population a shorter period of cohabitation resulted in a higher level of infertility. High infertility rates were also associated with later age at marriage and high social class. Current trends suggest that an increasing proportion of divorcing couples will be childless. It is concluded that there is need for a deeper knowledge of possible relationships, and their causes, in this and other areas of married life.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 121 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, M. (1973) Subjective Social Indicators. Social Trends, 4. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Chester, R. (1972) Is there a relationship between childlessness and marriage breakdown? J. biosoc. Sci. 4, 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farid, S.M. (1974) On the tempo of childbearing in England and Wales. Popul. Stud. 28, 69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
General Household Śurvey Unit (1978) The changing circumstances of women 1971–76. Popul. Trends, 13, 17.Google Scholar
General Register Office (1966) Fertility Tables, Census 1961. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. (1974) The association between divorce and social class in England and Wales. Br. J. Sociol. 25, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, N. (1976) When Marriage Ends. Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
Leete, R. (1976) Marriage and divorce. Popul. Trends, 10, 17.Google Scholar
McGregor, O. R., Blom-Cooper, L. & Gibson, C. (1970) Separated Spouses. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
McGregor, O.R. & Gibson, C. (1974) Matrimonial Orders. Report of the Committee on One-Parent Families, Appendices, p. 259. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Monahan, T.P. (1955) Is childlessness related to family stability? Am. sociol. Rev. 20, 446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1978) Demographic Review for 1977. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Peel, J. & Carr, G. (1975) Contraception and Family Design. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Pierce, R.M. (1963) Marriage in the fifties. Social. Rev. 11, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Registrar General (1974) Statistical Review of England and Wales, 1972. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Registrar General (1977) Marriage and Divorce Statistics, 1974. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar