Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:47:53.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characteristics of special groups of abortion patients from one health district

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

John R. Ashton
John R. Ashton
Affiliation:
Department of Community Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Four special groups of women resident and obtaining abortions in one health district are described: women under 16 years and over 35 years, those undergoing a second or third abortion, and those obtaining operations later than 20 weeks gestation. These women rarely obtain adequate contraceptive advice and services, particularly when oral contraception has not proved to be suitable for them. It appears that some general practitioners do not offer a comprehensive family planning service and that this can result in women resorting to unreliable methods of birth control despite their demonstrated willingness to use contraception.

Among the very young, though most have received teaching about contraception, few appear to use any method; the confusion over the age of consent may be contributing to the failure of adults to make adequate provision for this group. The women over 35 years seemed to have little contact with family planning advice. There was a disturbing failure to meet the demand for sterilization until an unwanted pregnancy had occurred.

Patients undergoing a second or third abortion were frequently found to have contraceptive problems; there was no evidence that they were irresponsible as a group. A description of two patients obtaining operations after 20 weeks gestation illustrates the complexities of the late abortion issue. It is suggested that restrictive legislation cannot hope to contain the determination which may accompany the decision to seek abortion.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 1981 , pp. 63 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashton, J.R. (1980a) Experiences of women refused National Health Service abortion. J. biosoc. Sci. 12, 201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, J.R. (1980b) Sex education and contraceptive practice amongst abortion patients. J. biosoc. Sci. 12, 211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, J.R. (1980c) Patterns of discussion and decision-making amongst abortion patients. J. biosoc. Sci. 12, 247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, J.R. (1980d) Components of delay amongst women obtaining termination of pregnancy. J. biosoc. Sci. 12, 261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, J.R., Dennis, K.J., Rowe, R.G., Waters, W.E. & Wheeller, M.J. (1980) The Wessex abortion studies: I, Inter district variation in provision of abortion services. Lancet, i, 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, C. (1977) Third time unlucky: a study of women who have three or more abortions. J. biosoc. Sci. 9, 99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corrie, J. (1979) The Abortion Amendment Bill. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
OPCS (1979) Abortion Monitor, AB 79/10. HM Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Tietze, C. & Murstein, M.C. (1975) Induced Abortion: 1975 Factbook. Population Council, New York.Google ScholarPubMed