We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Catalano, R. & Brucker, T. (2006) Secondary sex ratios and male lifespan: damaged or culled cohorts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA103(5), 1639–1643.Google Scholar
Chisholm, J. S. (1999) Death, Hope and Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Cohan, C. L. & Cole, S. W. (2002) Life course transitions and natural disaster: marriage, birth, and divorce following Hurricane Hugo. Journal of Family Psychology16(1), 14–25. doi: 10.1037//0893-3200.16.1.14Google Scholar
Fukuda, M., Fukuda, K., Shimizu, T. & Møller, H. (1998) Decline in sex-ratio at birth after Kobe earthquake. Human Reproduction13(8), 2321–2032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukuda, M., Fukuda, K., Shimizu, T., Yomura, W. & Shimizu, S. (1996) Kobe earthquake and reduced sperm motility. Human Reproduction11(6), 1244–1246.Google Scholar
Hamamatsu, Y., Watanabe, C. & Umezaki, M. (2014) Secondary sex ratio and marriage after disaster: a reply to O'Donnell and Behie. Journal of Biosocial Science doi: 10.1017/S0021932014000297.Google Scholar
Raschky, P. A. & Wang, L. C. (2012) Reproductive behaviours at the end of the world: the effect of the Cuban missile crisis on U.S. fertility. Department of Economics Discussion Paper 54/12. Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, J. L., St John, C. A. & Coleman, R. (2005) Did fertility go up after the Oklahoma City bombing? An analysis of births in metropolitan counties in Oklahoma, 1990–1999. Demography42(4), 675–692. doi: 10.1353/dem.2005.0034Google Scholar