Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:11:05.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Abortion and accident proneness: a Danish validation study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Ronald L. Somers
Ronald L. Somers
Affiliation:
Accident Analysis Group, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The hypothesis that women who experience accidental pregnancy are at risk for all types of accident has been examined to test indirectly the validity of a commonly postulated abortion personality profile. Identified women undergoing abortion in Odense, Denmark, were compared with non-abortion community women as to their registered incidence of accident-related trauma over a 2-year period. Age- and cause-specific accident rates were found not to vary significantly between the abortion and non-abortion groups of women.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 1981 , pp. 425 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arbous, A.G. & Kerrich, J.E. (1951) Accident statistics and the concept of accident-proneness. Biometrics, 7, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, C. (1977) Third time unlucky: a study of women who have three or more legal abortions. J. biosoc. Sci. 9, 99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howe, B., Kaplan, H.R. & English, C. (1979) Repeat abortions: blaming the victims. Am. J. publ. Hlth, 69, 1242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leach, J. (1977) The repeat abortion patient. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 9, 37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mantel, N. & Haenszel, W. (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J. natn. Cancer Inst. 22, 719.Google ScholarPubMed
Roemer, R. (1978) Equity in abortion services. Am. J. publ. Hlth, 68, 629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rovinsky, J.J. (1972) Abortion recidivism. J. Obstet. Gynec. 39, 649.Google ScholarPubMed
Sandberg, E.C. & Jacobs, R.I. (1971) Psychology of the misuse and rejection of contraception. Am. J. Obstet. Gynec. 110, 227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somers, R.L. (1977) Repeat abortion in Denmark: an analysis based on national record linkage. Stud. Fam. Plann. 8, 142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wigglesworth, E.C. (1978) The fault doctrine and injury control. J. Trauma, 18, 789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO (1965) International Classification of Diseases, 8th Revision. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar