Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:48:23.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The value of a statistical life: some clarifications and puzzles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2013

Cass R. Sunstein
Cass R. Sunstein*
Affiliation:
Harvard Law School, Areeda Hall 225, 1563 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
*
Cass R. Sunstein, Harvard Law School, Areeda Hall 225, 1563 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA[email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many people have wondered why the US government conducts cost-benefit analysis with close reference to the value of a statistical life (VSL). It is helpful to answer that question by reference to the “Easy Cases,” in which those who benefit from regulatory protection must pay for it. In such cases, WTP is usually the right foundation for VSL, because beneficiaries are hardly helped by being forced to pay for regulatory protection that they believe not to be in their interests. In the Easy Cases, arguments from both welfare and autonomy support the use of WTP and VSL (with potentially important qualifications involving imperfect information and behavioral market failures). The analysis is less straightforward in harder cases, in which beneficiaries do not pay for all of the cost of what they receive (and may pay little of that cost). In such cases, arguments from welfare and autonomy might not lead in any clear direction. In the harder cases, regulation might be justified on welfare grounds even if the cost-benefit analysis (based on VSL) suggests that it is not. In principle, a direct inquiry into welfare (the master concept) would be preferable to use of cost-benefit analysis. In the harder cases, distributional considerations might also count in favor of proceeding (as prioritarianism suggests). But at the current time, direct inquiries into welfare consequences and into distributional effects are challenging in practice, and hence regulators should generally rely on cost-benefit analysis, making welfarist adjustments, or adjustments based on distributional considerations, only in compelling cases.

Keywords

cost-benefit analysisvalue of a statistical lifewillingness to pay
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , 01 August 2013 , pp. 237 - 261
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis 2013

References

Adler, M. D. (2008). Risk equity: a new proposal. Harvard Environmental Law Review 32, 1. Available at: Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=981003 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.981003.Google Scholar
Adler, M. D (2011). Well-being and fair distribution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, M. D. (2013). Happiness surveys and public policy: what’s the use? Duke Law Journal 62, 1509–1601.Google Scholar
Adler, M., & Posner, E. (1999). Implementing cost-benefit analysis when preferences are distorted. U Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper, (88).Google Scholar
Adler, M. D., & Posner, E. A. (2006). New foundations of cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akerlof, G. A., & Dickens, W. T. (1984). The economic consequences of cognitive dissoncance. In: Ackerlof, G. A. (Ed.) An economic theorist′s book of tales. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldy, J., & Viscusi, K. W. (2007). Age differences in the value of statistical life. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 1(2), 241–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, R. J. (2000). Luck egalitarianism and prioritarianism. Ethics 110(2), 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashenfelter, O., & Greenstone, M. (2002). Using mandated speed limits to measure the value of a statistical life. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w9094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, D. J., Kimball, M. S., Heffetz, O., & Rees-Jones, A. (2012). What do you think would make you happier? What do you think you would choose? The American Economic Review 102(5), 2083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronsteen, J., Buccafusco, C., & Masur, Jonathan S. (2013). Well-being analysis versus cost-benefit analysis. Duke Law Journal 62, 1603–1689.Google Scholar
Conly, S. (2012). Against autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropper, M., Hammitt, J., & Robinson, L. (2011). Valuing mortality risk reductions: progress and challenges. Annual Review of Resource Economics 3, 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Transportation. (DOT). (2013). Available at: http://www.dot.gov/sites/dot.dev/files/docs/DOT%202013%20Signed%20VSL%20Memo.pdf.Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, A. D. (1848). 1969, Democracy in America Trans. by Lawrence, George. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Diamond, P. A., & Hausman, J. A. (1994). Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4), 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorman, P. (1996). Markets and mortality. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorman, P., & Hagstrom, P. (1998). Wage compensation for dangerous work revisited. Industrial & Labor Relations Review 52, 116–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, E., & Norton, M. (2013). Happy money. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (2002). Sovereign virtue. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (1985). Sour grapes: studies in the subversion of rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J., & Roemer, J. E. (Eds.). (1993). Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2000). Agency Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses. Available at: http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eerm.nsf/vwAN/EE-0228C-07.pdf/$file/EE-0228C-07.pdf.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2010). Valuing Mortality Risk Reductions for Environmental Policy: A White Paper (Review Draft). Prepared by the National Center for Environmental Economics for consultation with the Science Advisory Board – Environmental Economics Advisory Committee.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2000). Miswanting. In: Forgas, J. P. (Ed.), Feeling and thinking. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, C. (2013). An economist’s perspective on well-being analysis and cost-benefit analysis. Duke Law Journal 62, 1691–1700.Google Scholar
Hedbegian, R. J., Gray, W., & Morgan, C. (2007). Benefits and costs from sulfur dioxide trading: a distributional analysis. In: Visgilio, G. R. and Whitelaw, D. M. (Eds.), Acid in the environment: lessons learned and future prospects. New York, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. (1941). The rehabilitation of consumers’ surplus. The Review of Economic Studies 8(2), 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones-Lee, M. W. (1991). Altruism and the value of other people’s safety. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 4(2), 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones-Lee, M. W. (1992). Paternalistic altruism and the value of statistical life. The Economic Journal 102(410), 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, M. (2001). The beneficiaries of clean air act regulation. Regulation, 24, 34–38.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review 93(5), 1449–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Varey, C. (1991). Notes on the psychology of utility. In: Elster, J. and Roemer, J. (Eds.), Interpersonal comparisons of utility. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 375–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplow, L., & Shavell, S. (1994). Why the legal system is less efficient than the income tax in redistributing wealth. Journal of Legal Studies 23, 667–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, N., Loewenstein, G., & McCafferty, J. (2004). The economics of meaning. Nordic Journal of Political Economy 30(1), 61–75.Google Scholar
Khader, S. J. (2011). Adaptive preferences and women′s empowerment. OUP USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kling, C. L. & Swackhamer, D. L. (2011). Review of ‘Valuing Mortality Risk Reductions for Environmental Policy: A White Paper’ (December 10, 2010). Memorandum to Lisa P. Jackson, EPA Administrator, from the EPA Science Advisory Board and Environmental Economics Advisory Committee. EPA-SAB-11-011.Google Scholar
Kniesner, T. J., Viscusi, K. W. & Ziliak, J. P. (2012). Willingness to accept equals willingness to pay for labor market estimates of the value of statistical life. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2221038.Google Scholar
Korobkin, R. (2003). The endowment effect and legal analysis. Northwestern University Law Review 97(3), 1227–1293.Google Scholar
Leung, J., & Guna, J. (2006). Value of statistical life: adults versus children, Accid Anal. Prev. 38(6), 1208–1217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindhjem, H., Navrud, S., Braathen, N. A., & Biausque, V.. (2011). Valuing mortality risk reductions from environmental, transport, and health policies: a global meta-analysis of stated preference studies. Risk Analysis 31(9), 1381–1407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livermore, M. A., & Rosenberg, J. S. (2013). The shape of distributional analysis. The Globalization of Cost-Benefit Analysis in Environmental Policy 5, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1859). On liberty. (Casey, Kathy ed., 2002). New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Miller, T. R. (2000). Variations between countries in value of a statistical life. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 34, 169–188.Google Scholar
Posner, E. A., & Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Dollars and death. The University of Chicago Law Review 537–598.Google Scholar
Robinson, L. A., & Hammitt, J. K. (2011). Valuing health and longevity in regulatory analysis: current issues and challenges, In: The Handbook on the Politics of Regulation Levi-Faur, D. (Ed.), Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar. Available at www.regulatory-analysis.com.Google Scholar
Robinson, L. A., & Hammitt, J. K.. (2013). Skills of the trade: valuing health risk reductions in benefit-cost analysis. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 4(1), 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (2002). Rationality and freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sharot, T. (2010). The optimism bias. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Shavell, S. (1981). A note of efficiency vs. distributional equity in legal rulemaking: should distributional equity matter given optimal income taxation? The American Economic Review 71(2), 414–418.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2002a). Risk and reason. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2002b). Probability neglect. The Yale Law Journal 112(1), 61–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2013a). The storrs lectures: behavioral economics and paternalism. Yale Law Journal, 113, Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2182619orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2182619.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2013b). Simpler. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2014). The real world of cost-benefit analysis. Colum L Rev (forthcoming 2014).Google Scholar
Thaler, R., & Rosen, S. (1976). The value of saving a life. Available at http://www.nber.org/chapters/c3964.pdf.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ubel, P. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Pain and suffering awards: they shouldn’t be (just) about pain and suffering. The Journal of Legal Studies 37(S2), S195–S216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viscusi, K. W. (1992). Fatal tradeoffs. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viscusi, W. (2010). The heterogeneity of the value of statistical life. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 40(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viscusi, K. W., & Aldy, J. (2003). The value of a statistical life. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 27(1), 5–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viscusi, K. W. (2013). The benefits of mortality risk reduction. The Duke Law Journal 62, 1735–1745.Google Scholar
Weisbach, D. A. (2003). Should legal rules be used to redistribute income? The University of Chicago Law Review 70(1), 439–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, S. H. (2013). Statistical children. Yale Journal of Regulation 30, 63–125.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. In: Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar