Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:00:00.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Synthesis of Random Assignment Benefit-Cost Studies of Welfare-to-Work Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2015

David H. Greenberg ,
Victoria Deitch  and
Gayle Hamilton
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Over the past two decades, federal and state policymakers have dramatically reshaped the nation’s system of cash welfare assistance for low-income families. During this period, there has been considerable variation from state to state in approaches to welfare reform, which are often collectively referred to as “welfare-to-work programs.” This article synthesizes an extraordinary body of evidence: results from 28 benefit-cost studies of welfare-to-work programs based on random assignment evaluation designs. Each of the 28 programs can be viewed as a test of one of six types of welfare reform approaches: mandatory work experience programs, mandatory job-search-first programs, mandatory education-first programs, mandatory mixed-initial-activity programs, earnings supplement programs, and time-limit-mix programs. After describing how benefit-cost studies of welfare-to-work programs are conducted and considering some limitations of these studies, the synthesis addresses such questions as: Which welfare reform program approaches yield a positive return on investments made, from the perspective of program participants and from the perspective of government budgets, and the perspective of society as a whole? Which approaches make program participants better off financially? In which approaches do benefits exceed costs from the government’s point of view? The last two of these questions coincide with the trade-off between reducing dependency on government benefits and ensuring adequate incomes for low-income families. Because the benefit-cost studies examined program effects from the distinct perspectives of government budgets and participants’ incomes separately, they address this trade-off directly. The article thus uses benefit-cost findings to aid in assessing the often complex trade-offs associated with balancing the desire to ensure the poor of adequate incomes and yet encourage self-sufficiency.

Keywords

welfare-to-workAFDCTANFsynthesisrandom assignment
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , 14 July 2010 , pp. 1 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis 2011

References

Ashworth, Karl, Cebulla, Andreas, Greenberg, David, and Walker, Robert. 2004. “Meta-evaluation: Discovering What Works Best in Welfare Provision,” Evaluation 10, 2: 193-216.Google Scholar
Bloom, Dan, Kemple, James, Morris, Pamela, Scrivener, Susan, Verma, Nandita, and Hendra, Richard, with Adams-Ciardullo, Diana, Seith, David, and Walter, Johanna. 2000. The Family Transition Program: Final Report on Florida’s Initial Time-Limited Welfare Program. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
Bloom, Dan, and Michalopoulos, Charles. 2001. How Welfare and Work Policies Affect Employment and Income: A Synthesis of Research. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
Bloom, Dan, Scrivener, Sue, Michalopoulos, Charles, Morris, Pamela, Hendra, Richard, Adams-Ciardullo, Dianna, and Walter, Johanna, with Vargas, Wanda. 2002. Jobs First: Final Report on Connecticut’s Welfare Reform Initiative. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
Boardman, Anthony, Greenberg, David, Vining, Aidan, and Weimer, David. 2006. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ford, Reuben, Gyarmati, David, Foley, Kelly, and Tattrie, Doug, with Jimenez, Liza. 2003. Can Work Incentives Pay for Themselves? Final Report on the Self-Sufficiency Project for Welfare Applicants. Ottawa: Social Research and Demonstration Corporation.Google Scholar
Freedman, Stephen, Knab, Jean Tansey Gennetian, Lisa A., and Navarro, David. 2000. The Los Angeles Jobs-First GAIN Evaluation: Final Report on a Work First Program in a Major Urban Center. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
Friedlander, Daniel, Erickson, Marjorie, Hamilton, Gayle, and Knox, Virginia. 1986. West Virginia: Final Report on the Community Work Experience Demonstrations. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
Friedlander, Daniel, Freedman, Stephen, Hamilton, Gayle, and Quint, Janet. 1987. Final Report on Job Search and Work Experience in Cook County. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
Friedlander, Daniel, and Hamilton, Gayle. 1993. The Saturation Work Initiative Model in San Diego: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
Goldman, Barbara, Friedlander, Daniel, and Long, David. 1986. Final Report on the San Diego Job Search and Work Experience Demonstration. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
Greenberg, David, 1997. “The Leisure Bias in Cost-Benefit Analyses of Employment and Training Programs,” The Journal of Human Resources 32, 2: 413-439.Google Scholar
Greenberg, David, Ashworth, Karl, Cebulla, Andreas, and Walker, Robert. 2004. “Do Welfare-to-Work Programmes Work for Long?” Fiscal Studies 25, 1: 27-53.Google Scholar
Greenberg, David, Ashworth, Karl, Cebulla, Andreas, and Walker, Robert. 2005. “When Welfare-to-Work Programs Seem to Work Well: Explaining Why Riverside and Portland Shine So Brightly,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 58, 1: 34-50.Google Scholar
Greenberg, David, Deitch, Victoria, and Hamilton, Gayle. 2009. Welfare-to-Work Program Benefits and Costs: A Synthesis of Research. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
Grogger, Jeffrey, and Karoly, Lynn A.. 2005. Welfare Reform: Effects of a Decade of Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Gayle, Freedman, Stephen, Gennetian, Lisa, Michalopoulos, Charles, Walter, Johanna, Adams-Ciardullo, Diana, Gassman-Pines, Anna, McGroder, Sharon, Zaslow, Martha, Brooks, Jennifer, and Ahluwalia, Surjeet. 2001. How Effective Are Different Welfare-to-Work Approaches? Five-Year Adult and Child Impacts for Eleven Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
Hardin, Einar and Borus, Michael E.. 1969. Economic Benefits and Costs of Retraining Courses in Michigan. East Lansing, MI: School of Labor and Industrial Relations, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Kemper, Peter, Long, David A., and Thornton, Craig. 1981. The Supported Work Evaluation: Final Benefit-Cost Analysis. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
Kemple, James, Friedlander, Daniel, and Fellerath, Veronica. 1995. Florida’s Project Independence: Benefits, Costs, and Two-Year Impacts of Florida’s JOBS Program. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
Michalopoulos, Charles. 2005. Does Making Work Pay Still Pay? An Update on the Effects of Four Earnings Supplement Programs on Employment, Earnings, and Income. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
Michalopoulos, Charles, Tattrie, Doug, Miller, Cynthia, Robins, Phillip K., Morris, Pamela, Gyarmati, David, Redcross, Cindy, Foley, Kelly, and Ford, Reuben. 2002. Making Work Pay: Final Report on the Self-Sufficiency Project for Long-Term Recipients. Ottawa: Social Research and Demonstration Corporation.Google Scholar
Miller, Cynthia, Knox, Virginia, Gennetian, Lisa A., Dodoo, Martey, Hunter, Jo Anna, and Redcross, Cindy. 2000. Reforming Welfare and Rewarding Work: Final Report on the Minnesota Family Investment Program, Vol. 1: Effects on Adults. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
Moffitt, Robert. 1983. “An Economic Model of Welfare Stigma,” American Economic Review 73: 1023-35.Google Scholar
Morris, Pamela A., Gennetian, Lisa A., and Duncan, Greg J.. 2005. “Effects of Welfare and Employment Policies on Young Children: New Findings on Policy Experiments Conducted in the Early 1990s.” Social Policy Report 19, 2. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
Morris, Pamela A., Huston, Aletha C., Duncan, Greg J., Crosby, Danielle A., and Bos, Johannes. 2001. How Welfare and Work Policies Affect Children: A Synthesis of Research. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
Riccio, James A., Friedlander, Daniel, and Freedman, Stephen, with Farrell, Mary E., Fellerath, Veronica, Fox, Stacey, and Lehman, Daniel J.. 1994. GAIN: Benefits, Costs, and Three-Year Impacts of a Welfare-to-Work Program. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
Scrivener, Susan, Hendra, Richard, Redcross, Cindy, Bloom, Dan, Michalopoulos, Charles, and Walter, Johanna. 2002. WRP: Final Report on Vermont’s Welfare Restructuring Project. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar