Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:35:41.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

News and Social Cost: The Case of Oil Spills and Distant Viewers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2015

Scott Farrow
Affiliation:
UMBC
Douglas M. Larson
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although contingent valuation methods are now frequently used to assess the total value of even distant events, benefit-cost analysis could also be informed by observed behavior that links distant events and consumers. It is typically the news media which connect passive consumers to distant events about which they may or may not take action. The information and adaptation costs incurred by the news consumer are privately beneficial, but additionally are shown to be a lower bound to social welfare losses from a socially defined “bad” event under plausible circumstances. The recent Deepwater Horizon well blow-out in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico is a current example which we seek to inform by study of the oil spill from the Valdez, Alaska spill in 1989. We identify an incremental willingness to pay for news about the Exxon Valdez spill above a standard news broadcast and an increased probability of viewing a broadcast related to the spill. We develop and explain how this private value associated with media consumption can be interpreted as a partial measure of social costs for passive viewers who take no further action beyond news viewing and likely represent the majority of affected citizens (though not necessarily the majority of social costs). Though the per-person values of passive users may be modest in magnitude in the present application, some passive use values appear to be measurable, and that it may well be worth pursuing further the search for the faint but observable links between behavior and distant events through the news media.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis 2012

References

Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P. R., Leamer, E. E., Radner, R., and Schuman, H.. (1993). Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register, vol. 58 (10): 46014614.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary. (1965). “A Theory of the Allocation of Time,” Economic Journal, vol. LXXV: 493517.Google Scholar
Bignell, J., and Orelbar, J.. (2005). The Television Handbook, 3rd edn., New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Campbell, J., Lo, A., and MacKinlay, C.. (1997). The Econometrics of Financial Markets, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carson, Richard T., Mitchell, Robert C., Michael Hanemann, W., Kopp, Raymond J., Presser, Stanley, and Ruud, Paul A.. (1994). “Contingent Valuation and Lost Distant Use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez ,” Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 94-18, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Carson, Richard T., Flores, Nicholas E., and Meade, Norman F.. (2001). “Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence,” Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 19 (2): 173210.Google Scholar
Carson, Richard T., Mitchell, Robert C., Hanemann, Michael, Kopp, Raymond J., Presser, Stanley, and Rudd, Paula A.. (2003). “Contingent Valuation and Lost Passive Use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill,” Environmental Resource Economics, vol. 25: 257-286.Google Scholar
Clemen, R. (1996). Making Hard Decisions, Pacific Grove: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1952). An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Eckhout, L., Gollier, C., and Schlesinger, H.. (2005). Economic and Financial Decisions Under Risk, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, James T. (1995). “Pollution as News: Media and Stock Market Reactions to the Toxics Release Inventory Data,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 28: 98113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, James T. (2004). All the News That’s Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, Jerry A., ed. (1993). Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Hirshleifer, J., and Riley, J. (1997). The Analytics of Uncertainty and Information, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Kinder, Donald. (1987). News That Matters, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lamdin, Douglas J. (2001). “Implementing and Interpreting Event Studies of Regulatory Changes,” Journal of Business and Economics, vol. 53: 171183.Google Scholar
Morgan, G., and Henrion, M.. (2004). Uncertainty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, P., and Cohen, A.. (2006). News Around the World, New York: Routledge Group.Google Scholar
Small, Kenneth A., and Rosen, Harvey S.. (1981). “Applied Welfare Economics with Discrete Choice Models,” Econometrica, vol. 49: 105130.Google Scholar
Turner, R. K., Bateman, I., and Adger, W. N.. (2001). Economics of Coastal and Water Resources: Valuing Environmental Functions, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1989). Current Population Reports Series P-60, No. 172, Table 11.Google Scholar
Vanderbilt Television News Archive. (1989–1990). “Television News Index and Abstracts,” Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
Zerbe, Richard O. (2001). Economic Efficiency in Law and Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar