Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:14:47.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to a special issue entitled Perspectives on Implementing Benefit-Cost Analysis in Climate Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2015

Fran Sussman ,
Anne Grambsch ,
Jia Li  and
Christopher P. Weaver
Anne Grambsch
Affiliation:
Global Change Assessment Staff, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
Jia Li
Affiliation:
Climate Change Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
Christopher P. Weaver
Affiliation:
Global Change Assessment Staff, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Over the past half-century or more, economists have developed a robust literature on the theory and practice of benefit-cost analysis (BCA) as applied to diverse projects and policies. Recent years have seen a growing demand for practical applications of BCA to climate change policy questions. As economists seek to meet this demand, they face challenges that arise from the nature of climate change impacts, such as the long time frame and the potential for non-marginal changes, the importance of intangible effects, and the need to grapple with Knightian uncertainty. As a result of these and other characteristics of climate change, many of the fundamental tenets of BCA are coming under scrutiny and the limits of BCA’s methodological and practical boundaries are being tested. This special issue assembles a set of papers that review the growing body of literature on the economics of climate change. The papers describe the state of the literature valuing climate change impacts, both globally and at more disaggregated levels. The papers also discuss the challenges economists face in applying BCA to support climate change decision making and adaptation planning. This introduction provides background and context on the current use of BCA in climate change analysis, and sets each paper firmly in that context, identifying also areas for future research. While the challenges in conducting BCA and interpreting its results are significant, across the papers it becomes clear that economic analysis in general, and the tools and methods of BCA in particular, have a central role to play in supporting decision-making about how to respond to climate change.

Keywords

benefit-cost analysisclimate changedecision-makinguncertaintyvaluation
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis , Volume 5 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Perspectives on Implementing Benefit-Cost Analysis in Climate Assessment , December 2014 , pp. 333 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis 2014

References

Gordon, K. (2014). Risky business: The economic risks of climate change in the United States. Risky Business Project.Google Scholar
IPCC. (1995). Climate Change 1995: Economic and social dimensions of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Bruce, J., Lee, H. & Haites, E. (Eds.). Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved from http://www.econlib.org/library/Knight/knRUP.html, Boston, MA: Hart, Schaffner & Marx; Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
Lempert, R. J. (2014). Embedding benefit-cost concepts into decision support processes with deep uncertainty. The Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(3), 487–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., Mullan, M. & Helgeson, J.r. (2014). Improving the practice of economic analysis of climate change adaptation. The Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(3), 445–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, J. E. & Strzepek, K. (2014). State of the literature on the economic impacts of climate change in the United States. The Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(3), 411–443.Google Scholar
Stern, N. H. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sussman, F., Weaver, C.P. & Grambsch, A. (2014). Challenges in applying the paradigm of welfare economics to climate change. The Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(3), 347–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toman, M. (2014). The need for multiple types of information to inform climate change assessment. The Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(3),469–485.Google Scholar
The White House. (2013). The President’s Climate Action Plan. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/image/president27sclimateactionplan.pdf.Google Scholar
U.S. Global Change Research Program. (2014). Climate change impacts in the United States: The third national climate assessment. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.7930/J0Z31WJ2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldhoff, S. T., Martinich, J., Sarofim, M., DeAngelo, B., McFarland, J., Jantarasami, L., … Li, J. (2014). Overview of the special issue: A multi-model framework to achieve consistent evaluation of climate change impacts in the United States. Climatic Change, 1–20. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1206-0.Google Scholar
Weyant, J. P. (2014). Integrating economic assessments of climate change: State of the literature. The Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 5(3), 377–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. (2010). Economics of adaptation to climate change – Synthesis report (No. 70267). The World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2010/01/16436675/economics-adaptation-climate-change-synthesis-report, Washington DC.Google Scholar