Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:23:26.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do We Need a New Behavioral Benchmark for BCA?1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2016

Jason F. Shogren  and
Linda Thunström
Jason F. Shogren*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics & Finance, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, USA, e-mail: [email protected]
Linda Thunström
Affiliation:
Department of Economics & Finance, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, USA
*
*e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In our opinion, the challenges of ongoing measurement, the ever-moving behavioral baseline, and strategic self-ignorance return us full-circle to a sensible point made by Peter Bohm–Benefit-Cost Analysis for environmental goods should use an interval method.

Keywords

D61D03baselinebehavioralbehavioral economicsenvironmentenvironmental economics
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis , Volume 7 , Issue 1: Special Issue on [Ir]rationality, Happiness, and Benefit-Cost Analysis , Spring 2016 , pp. 92 - 106
Copyright
© Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, George & Schiller, Robert (2009). Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ariely, Dan, Loewenstein, George & Prelec, Drazen (2003). Coherent Arbitrariness: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 73–105.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth (1987). Rationality of Self and Others in an Economic System. In Hogarth, R. & Reder, M. (Eds.), Rational Choice: The Contrast between Economics and Psychology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Prasenjit & Shogren, Jason (2014). Bidding Behavior Given Point and Interval Values in a Second-Price Auction. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 97, 126–137.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary(2002). Interview for The Region, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (http://minneapolisfed.org/pubs/region/02-06/becker.cfm).Google Scholar
Bernheim, B. Douglas (2014). “Simple Solutions for Complex Problems in Behavioral Economics”. Paper presented at the Clarendon Lectures. Oxford: Lecture Theater.Google Scholar
Bernheim, B. Douglas (2016). The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: A Unified Approach to Behavioral Welfare Economics. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, (in press).Google Scholar
Bernheim, B. Douglas, Fradkin, Andrey & Popov, Igor (2015). The Welfare Economics of Default Options in 401(k) Plans. American Economic Review, 105, 2798–2837.Google Scholar
Beshears, John, Choi, James, Laibson, David & Madrian, Brigitte (2008). How Are Preferences Revealed? Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1787–1794.Google Scholar
Bohm, Peter (1979). Estimating Willingness to Pay: Why and How? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 81, 142–153.Google Scholar
Bohm, Peter (1984). Revealing Demand for an Actual Public Good. Journal of Public Economics, 24, 135–151.Google Scholar
Bohm, Peter, Linden, Johan & Sonnegard, Joakin (1997). Eliciting Reservation Prices: Becker–DeGroot–Marschak Mechanisms vs. Markets. Economic Journal, 107, 1079–1089.Google Scholar
Carlsson, Fredrik (2010). Design of Stated Preference Surveys: Is There More to Learn from Behavioral Economics? Environmental and Resource Economics, 46, 167–177.Google Scholar
Cherry, Todd, Crocker, Thomas & Shogren, Jason (2003). Rationality Spillovers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 63–84.Google Scholar
Cherry, Todd, Frykblom, Peter & Shogren, Jason (2002). Hardnose the Dictator. American Economic Review, 92, 1218–1221.Google Scholar
Chetty, Ra.j (2015). Behavioral Economics and Public Policy: A Pragmatic Perspective. American Economic Review, 105, 1–33.Google Scholar
Crocker, Thomas, Shogren, Jason & Turner, Paul (1998). Incomplete Beliefs and Nonmarket Valuation. Resources and Energy Economics, 20, 139–162.Google Scholar
Cummings, Ronald, Brookshire, David & Schulze, William (1986). Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Galle, Brian(2011). The Distortionary Effects of Subsidies for Charity in a Federal System. available at http://works.bepress.com/brian_galle/20.Google Scholar
Gillingham, Kenneth, Newell, Richard & Palmer, Karen (2009). Energy Efficiency Economics and Policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1, 597–620.Google Scholar
Gsottbauer, E. & van den Bergh, Jeroen (2011). Environmental Policy Theory Given Bounded Rationality and Other-Regarding Preferences. Environmental and Resource Economics, 49, 263–304.Google Scholar
Hanley, Nick, Kriström, Bengt & Shogren, Jason (2009). Coherent Arbitrariness: On Value Uncertainty for Environmental Goods. Land Economics, 85, 41–50.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Elizabeth & Spitzer, Matthew (1985). Entitlements, Rights, and Fairness: An Experimental Examination of Subjects’ Concepts of Distributive Justice. Journal of Legal Studies, 14, 259–297.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Elizabeth, McCabe, Kevin, Shachat, Keith & Smith, Vernon (1994). Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7, 346–380.Google Scholar
Isoni, Andrea, Brooks, Peter, Loomes, Graham & Sugden, Robert (2016). Do Markets Reveal Preferences or Shape Them? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 122, 1–16.Google Scholar
Laibson, David & Yariv, Leeat(2007). Safety in Markets: An Impossibility Theorem for Dutch Books. Working paper, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Loomes, Graham, Starmer, Chris & Sugden, Robert (2003). Do Anomalies Disappear in Repeated Markets? Economic Journal, 113, C153–C166.Google Scholar
Jacquemet, Nicholas, Joule, Robert-Vincent, Luchini, Stephane & Shogren, Jason (2013). Preference Elicitation Under Oath. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 65, 110–132.Google Scholar
Jacquemet, Nicholas, James, Alex, Luchini, Stephane & Shogren, Jason (2016). Referenda Under Oath. Environmental and Resource Economics, (on-line 8 April).Google Scholar
Joule, Robert-Vincent, Girandola, Fabien & Bernard, Françoise (2007). How Can People be Induced to Willingly Change Their Behavior? The Path from Persuasive Communication to Binding Communication. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 493–505.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel & Knetsch, Jack (1992). Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22, 57–70.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel & Tversky, Amos(Eds.) (2000). Choices, Values and Frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel & Sugden, Robert (2005). Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32, 161–181.Google Scholar
Kling, Catherine, Phaneuf, Dan & Zhao, Jinhua (2012). From Exxon to BP: Has Some Number Become Better Than No Number? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26, 3–26.Google Scholar
Knetsch, Jack (1997). Evaluation and Environmental Policies: Recent Behavioural Findings and Further Implications. In Dragun, A. & Jakobsson, K. (Eds.), Sustainability and Global Environmental Policy: New Perspectives (pp. 193–212). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
McFadden, Daniel (1999). Rationality for Economists? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 73–105.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, Robert & Dolan, Paul (2012). Behavioural Economics and its Implications for Transport. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 503–511.Google Scholar
Mullainathan, Sendhil, Schwartzstein, Joshua & Congdon, William (2012). A Reduced Form Approach to Behavioral Public Finance. Annual Review of Economics, 4, 511–540.Google Scholar
Payne, John, Bettman, James & Schkade, David (1999). Measuring Constructed Preferences: Towards a Building Code. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 243–270.Google Scholar
Plott, Charles et al. (1996). Rational Individual Behaviour in Markets and Social Choice Processes: the Discovered Preference Hypothesis. In Arrow, K. (Ed.), Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior (pp. 225–250). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rabin, Matthew (1998). Psychology and Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 11–46.Google Scholar
Robinson, Lisa & Hammitt, James (2011). Behavioral Economics and the Conduct of Benefit-Cost Analysis: Towards Principles and Standards. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2, 1–51.Google Scholar
Shogren, Jason (1997). Self-Interest and Equity in a Bargaining Tournament with Non-Linear Payoffs. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 32, 383–394.Google Scholar
Shogren, Jason (2005). Experimental Methods and Valuation. Handbook of Environmental Economics (Vol. 2, pp. 969–1027). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Shogren, Jason (2006). A Rule of One. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88, 1147–1159.Google Scholar
Shogren, Jason (2012). Behavioral Environmental Economics: Money Pumps and Nudges. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 37, 349–360.Google Scholar
Shogren, Jason & Taylor, Laura (2008). On Behavioral-Environmental Economics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2, 26–44.Google Scholar
Slovic, Paul (1991). The Construction of Preferences. American Psychologist, 50, 364–371.Google Scholar
Smith, V. Kerry & Moore, Eric (2010). Behavioral Economics and Benefit Cost Analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 46, 217–234.Google Scholar
Smith, Vernon (2003). Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics. American Economic Review, 93, 465–508.Google Scholar
Sugden, Robert (2005). Anomalies and Stated Preference Techniques: A Framework for a Discussion of Coping Strategies. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32, 1–12.Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard & Sunstein, Cass (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thunström, Linda, Nordström, Jonas, Shogren, Jason, Ehmke, Mariah & van’t Veld, Klaas (2016). Strategic Self-Ignorance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, (in press).Google Scholar
Thunström, Linda, van’t Veld, Klaas, Shogren, Jason & Nordström, Jonus (2014). On Strategic Ignorance of Environmental Harm and Social Norms. Revue d’Économie Politique, 124, 195–214.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos & Simonson, Itamar (1993). Context-Dependent Preferences. Management Science, 39, 1179–1189.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip & Gayer, Ted (2015). Behavioral Public Choice: Behavioral Paradox of Government Policy. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 38, 973–1007.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip & Gayer, Ted (2016). Rational Benefit Assessment for an Irrational World: Toward a Behavioral Transfer Test. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, (in press).Google Scholar