Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T18:09:47.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Categorizing and Ranking Graphs in Economics Research: The American Economic Review over the Last Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Jonathan Schwabish
Jonathan Schwabish*
Affiliation:
Income and Benefits Policy Center, Urban Institute, Washington, DC, USA
*
*Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How do economists use graphs, and do they use them well? Using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, I provide evidence to these questions by exploring more than 2600 graphs published in the first issue of the American Economic Review from 1911 to 2017. I find that economists use a lot of line charts – more than 80% of the total sample are line charts. I also find that the share of graphs that use data (as opposed to diagrams) fell over the first half of the century and then increased from about the early 1980s to today, correlated with perceived graph quality.

Keywords

American Economic Reviewdata visualizationMechanical TurkA12Y1
Type
Invited Paper
Information
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , Spring 2022 , pp. 20 - 33
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amazon Mechanical Turk FAQ. 2018. Available at https://www.mturk.com/worker/help (accessed October 2021).Google Scholar
Aumann, Robert J., and Dreze, Jacques H.. 2008. “Rational Expectations in Games.” The American Economic Review, 98(1): 72–86. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29729964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borkin, Michelle A., Vo, Azalea A., Bylinskii, Zoya, Isola, Phillip, Sunkavalli, Shashank, Oliva, Aude, and Pfister, Hanspeter. 2013. “What Makes a Visualization Memorable?” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12): 2306–2315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bronfenbrenner, Martin. 1947. “Price Control under Imperfect Competition.” The American Economic Review, 37(1): 107–120. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1802861.Google Scholar
Card, David, and DellaVigna, Stefano. 2013. “Nine Facts about Top Journals in Economics.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 18665 (January).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Lane, Yang, Fumeng, Franconeri, Steven, and Chang, Remco. 2014. “Ranking Visualizations of Correlation Using Weber’s Law.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20(12): 1943–1952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heckman, James J., and Payner, Brook S.. 1989. “Determining the Impact of Federal Antidiscrimination Policy on the Economic Status of Blacks: A Study of South Carolina.” The American Economic Review, 79(1): 138–177. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1804779.Google Scholar
Heer, Jeffrey, and Bostock, Michael. 2010. “Crowdsourcing Graphical Perception: Using Mechanical Turk to Assess Visualization Design.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 203–212. New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibrahim, Andrew M., Lillemoe, Keith D., Klingensmith, Mary E., and Dimick, Justin B.. 2017. “Visual Abstracts to Disseminate Research on Social Media: A Prospective, Case-Control Crossover Study.” Annals of Surgery, 266(6): e46–e48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ipeirotis, Panagiotis G. 2010. “Demographics of Mechanical Turk”.Google Scholar
Kemmerer, Edwin Walter. 1911. “Seasonal Variations in the New York Money Market.” The American Economic Review, 1(1), 33–49. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1802906.Google Scholar
Kong, Ha-Kyung, Liu, Zhicheng, and Karahalios, Karrie. 2018. “Frames and Slants in Titles in Visualizations on Controversial Topics.” 2018 CHI Conference. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosara, Robert, and Ziemkiewicz, Caroline. 2010. “Do Mechanical Turks Dream of Square Pie Charts?” In Proceedings of the 3rd BELIV’10 Workshop: Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Information Visualization: 63–70. New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margo, Robert A. 2011. “The Economic History of the ‘American Economic Review’: A Century’s Explosion of Economics Research.” The American Economic Review, 101(1), 9–35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41038779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Betsy. 2019. “Why Scientists Need to Be Better at Data Visualization.” Knowable Magazine. https://knowablemagazine.org/article/mind/2019/science-data-visualization.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Winter, and Suri, Siddharth. 2012. “Conducting Behavioral Research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk.” Behavior Research Methods, 44(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGovern, Pamela D., and Bushery, John M.. 1999. “Data Mining the CPS Reinterview: Digging into Response Error.” In Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology (Ed.) Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology Research Conference [Proceedings—Monday B Sessions]: 76–85). Washington, DC: Statistical Policy Office.Google Scholar
Medina, John. 2011. “Brain Rules: 12 Principles for Surviving and Thriving at Work, Home, and School.” ReadHowYouWant.com.Google Scholar
Schwabish, Jonathan. 2021. Better Data Visualizations: A Guide for Scholars, Researchers, and Wonks. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skau, Drew, Harrison, Lane, and Kosara, Robert. 2015. “An Evaluation of the Impact of Visual Embellishments in Bar Charts.” Computer Graphics Forum, 34(3): 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skau, Drew, and Kosara, Robert. 2016. “Arcs, Angles, or Areas: Individual Data Encodings in Pie and Donut Charts.” Computer Graphics Forum, 35(3): 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usher, Abbott Payson. 1916. “The Influence of Speculative Marketing Upon Prices.” The American Economic Review, 6(1): 49–60. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1827811.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Schwabish supplementary material

Schwabish supplementary material

Download Schwabish supplementary material(File)
File 1.9 MB