Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T03:27:48.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The BCA of HSR: Should the Government Invest in High Speed Rail Infrastructure?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2021

Ginés De Rus
Ginés De Rus*
Affiliation:
University of Las Palmas de G.C., Spain, and University Carlos III de Madrid, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper deals with public investment in High-Speed Rail (HSR) infrastructure and tries to understand the economic rationale for allocating public money to the construction of new HSR lines. The examination of data on costs and demand shows that the case for investing in HSR requires several conditions to be met: an ex ante high volume of traffic in the corridor where the new lines are built, significant time savings, high average willingness of potential users to pay, the release of capacity in the conventional rail network and airports. On the contrary, net environmental benefits seem to be insignificant in influencing the social desirability of HSR investment. This paper discusses, within a cost-benefit analysis framework, under which conditions the expected benefits could justify the investment in HSR projects.

Keywords

infrastructurepublic investmenthigh speed railbenefit-cost analysis
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , 03 January 2011 , pp. 1 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis 2011

References

Abelson, P. and Hensher, P.. 2001. “Induced travel and user benefis: clarifying definitions and measurement for urban road infrastructure,” in Hensher, D. and Button, K. (eds.): Handbook of transport systems and traffic control, Handbooks in Transport 3. Elsevier, Pergamon.Google Scholar
Adler, N., Nash, C. and Pels, E.. 2007. “Infrastructure Pricing: The Case of Airline and High Speed Rail Competition,” Paper presented at the 11th World Conference on Transport Research, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Atkins. 2004. High speed line study . Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions. London.Google Scholar
Banister, D. and Givoni, M.. 2006. “Airline and railway integration,” Transport Policy, 13(4): 386–397.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. 1983. “A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 98 (3): 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G.S. 2001. “A comment on the conference on cost-benefit analysis,” in Adler, M.D. and Posner, E.A. (eds) Cost-benefit analysis: Legal, economic and philosophical perspectives, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blum, U., Haynes, K. E. and Karlsson, C.. 1997. “Introduction to the special issue The regional and urban effects of high-speed trains,” The Annals of Regional Science, 31: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnafous, A. 1987. “The Regional Impact of the TGV,” Transportation 14: 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, J. and de Rus, G.. 2009. “Some stylized facts about high-speed rail: A review of HSR experiences around the world,” Transport Policy, 16(1): 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CE Delft. 2003. “To shift or not to shift, that’s the question. The environmental performance of the principal modes of freight and passenger transport in the policymaking context.” Delft.Google Scholar
de Rus, G. 2008. “The Economic effects of high-speed rail investment,” OECD-ITF Transport Research Centre. Discussion Paper, 2008–16.Google Scholar
de Rus, G. and Inglada, V.. 1993. “Análisis coste-beneficio del tren de alta velocidad en España,” Economía Aplicada, 3: 27–48.Google Scholar
de Rus, G. and Inglada, V.. 1997. “Cost-benefit analysis of the high-speed train in Spain,” The Annals of Regional Science, 3: 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Rus, G. and Nash, C.A.. 2007. “In what circumstances is investment in high-speed rail worthwhile?” Working Paper 590, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
de Rus, G. and Nombela, G.. 2007. “Is investment in high speed rail socially profitable?” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 41 (1): 3–23.Google Scholar
de Rus, G. and Román, C.. 2005. “Economic evaluation of the high speed rail Madrid-Barcelona,” 8th NECTAR Conference. Las Palmas, Spain.Google Scholar
de Rus, G. and Socorro, M.P.. 2010. “Infrastructure investment and incentives with supranational funding,” Transition Studies Review, 11 (17): 551–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A.K. and Pindyck, R.S.. 1994. Investment under uncertainty, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. 2008. Guide to cost-benefit analysis of investment projects, Directorate General Regional Policy.Google Scholar
Gómez-Ibañez, J.A. 2006. “An overview of the options” in Gómez-Ibañez, J.A. and de Rus, G., , G. (eds): Competition in the railway industry: An international comparative analysis. Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J.D. 2007. “Agglomeration, productivity and transport investment,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 41 (3): 317–343.Google Scholar
Harberger, A.C. 1965. “Survey of literature on cost-benefit analysis for industrial project evaluation.” Paper prepared for the Inter-Regional Symposium in Industrial Project Evaluation, reprinted in Harberger, A.C., Project Evaluation (collected papers) (Midway Reprint Series), Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haynes, K.E. 1997. “Labor markets and regional transportation improvements: the case of high-speed trains: An introduction and review,” The Annals of Regional Science, 31: 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INFRAS/IWW. 2000. External costs of transport. Report commissioned by UIC. Zurich-Karlsruhe-Paris.Google Scholar
Kageson, P. 2009. Environmental aspects of inter-city passenger transport. OECD-ITF Transport Research Centre. Discussion Paper, 2009–28.Google Scholar
Levinson, D., Mathieu, J.M., Gillen, D. and Kanafani, A.. 1997. “The full cost of high-speed rail: an engineering approach,” The Annals of Regional Science, 31: 189–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, F. 1997. “Justifying a high-speed rail project: social value vs. regional growth,” The Annals of Regional Science, 31: 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohring, H. 1976. Transportation Economics. Ballinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Nash, C. A. 1991. The case for high speed rail. Institute for Transport Studies, The University of Leeds, Working Paper 323.Google Scholar
Nash, C. A. 2001. “Pricing European Transport Systems: Recent developments and evidence from case studies,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 35 (3): 363–380.Google Scholar
Nash, C. A. 2003. “Marginal cost and other pricing principles for user charging in transport: a comment,” Transport Policy, 10 (2): 345–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nellthorp, J., Sansom, T., Bickel, P., Doll, C. and Lindberg, G.. 2001. Valuation conventions for UNITE, UNITE (UNIfication of accounts and marginal costs for Transport Efficiency), 5th Framework RTD Programme. ITS, University of Leeds, Leeds.Google Scholar
Plassard, F. 1994. “High speed transport and regional development” in Regional policy, transport network. European Conference of Ministers of Transport. Paris Google Scholar
Preston, J.M. and Wall, G.. 2007. The Impact of High Speed Trains on Socio-Economic Activity, proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Transport Research, Berkeley (California, USA).Google Scholar
Puga, D. 2002. “European regional policy in light of recent location theories,” Journal of Economic Geography 2(4): 373–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. A. and Torvik, R.. 2005. “White elephants,” Journal of Public Economics 89 (2–3): 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothengatter, W. 2003. “How good is first best? Marginal cost and other pricing principles for user charging in transport,” Transport Policy, 10 (2): 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steer, Davies Gleave. 2004. High speed rail: International comparisons. Commission for Integrated Transport. London.Google Scholar
UIC. 2005. High Speed Rail’s leading asset for customers and society. UIC Publications. Paris.Google Scholar
Venables, A.J. 2007. “Evaluating urban transport improvements. Cost–benefit analysis in the presence of agglomeration and income taxation,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 41 (2): 173–188.Google Scholar
Vickerman, R. 1995. “The regional impacts of Trans-European networks,” The Annals of Regional Science, 29: 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickerman, R. 1997. “High-speed rail in Europe: Experience and issues for future development,” The Annals of Regional Science, 31: 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickerman, R. 2006. Indirect and wider economic benefits of high speed rail. Paper given at the 4th annual conference on railroad industry structure, competition and investment, Madrid, October.Google Scholar