Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T17:52:22.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Retrospective Benefit-Cost Analysis on the Elwha River Restoration Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2019

Allen Bellas Open the ORCID record for Allen Bellas [Opens in a new window]  and
Lea Kosnik
Allen Bellas*
Affiliation:
College of Management, Metropolitan State University, Minneapolis, MN55403, USA, e-mail: [email protected]
Lea Kosnik
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO63121-4499, USA
*
*e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1992, Congress passed The Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Act with the goal of “full restoration of The Elwha River Ecosystem and native anadromous fisheries.” As part of that act, the federal government was required to produce a benefit-cost analysis on dam removal of the Elwha and Glines Canyon dams, which was published in 1994. This article revisits that initial 1994 benefit-cost analysis; background on its methods and assumptions is given, comparisons are made to current state-of-the-art techniques in benefit-cost analysis, and an ex post benefit-cost analysis of the project is conducted for comparison purposes. We find that the cost and scope of the project exceeded original expectations, the cost of the foregone electricity generation was less than expected, and that anticipated recreational and fisheries benefits were both delayed, and lower, than expected. Furthermore, issues such as the value of hatchery-spawned versus wild anadromous fish seem not to have been anticipated in the original analysis, highlighting the fact that in doing an ex ante analysis, researchers must expect that unexpected factors may influence the ex post results of any project.

Keywords

cost-benefit analysisdamhydropowerelectricityriver restoration.Q2Q4Q5H8
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , Spring 2020 , pp. 76 - 100
Copyright
© Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Joe, and Hoffman, Annette. 2017. Elwha River Dam Removal, Fish Status Update, and Fishing Moratorium. Available at http://wdfw.wa.gov/commission/meetings/2017/09/sep0817_14_presentation.pdf. (accessed November 22, 2017)Google Scholar
Bergstrom, John C., and Loomis, John B.. 2017. “Economic Valuation of River Restoration: An Analysis of the Valuation Literature and Its Uses in Decision-making .” Water Resources and Economics, 17: 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomquist, Glenn C., Blumenschein, Karen, and Johannesson, Magnus. 2009. “Eliciting Willingness to Pay Without Bias Using Follow-up Certainty Statements: Comparisons Between Probably/Definitely and a 10-Point Certainty Scale.” Environmental and Resource Economics, 43: 473–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohanon, Cecil E., Horowitz, John B., and McClure, James E.. 2014. “Saying Too Little, Too Late: Public Finance Textbooks and the Excess Burdens of Taxation.” Econ Journal Watch, 11(3): 277–296.Google Scholar
Bronsteen, John, Buccafusco, Christopher, and Masur, Jonathan S.. 2012. “Well-Being Analysis vs. Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Duke Law Journal, 62: 1603.Google Scholar
Champ, Patricia A., and Bishop, Richard C.. 2001. “Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias.” Environmental and Resource Economics, 19: 383–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilcote, Mark W., Leider, Steven A., and Loch, John J.. 1986. “Differential Reproductive Success of Hatchery and Wild Summer-Run Steelhead Under Natural Conditions.” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 115(5): 726–735.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Bradley T. 2012. “Dam Removal and Restoration on the Elwha River: Does Size Really Matter?”Google Scholar
Corps of Engineers, Seattle District. 2016. Final Environmental Assessment – Ediz Hook Revetment Repairs and Beach Nourishment Activities: FY2016-2026. Available at https://www.nws.usace.army.mil/Portals/27/docs/environmental/resources/2016EnvironmentalDocuments/Ediz%20Hook%202016-2026%20Revetment%20Repair%20FONSI_and_Final_EA.pdf?ver=2016-06-24-180719-883. (accessed January 26, 2019)Google Scholar
Department of the Interior, Department of Commerce, and Lower Elwha S’Klallam Tribe. 1994. The Elwha Report: Restoration of the Elwha River Ecosystem and Native Anadromous Fisheries. A Report Submitted Pursuant to Public Law 102-495.Google Scholar
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 1993. Draft Staff Report Volume I: Glines Canyon (FERC No. 588) and Elwha (FERC No. 2683) Hydroelectric Projects. Washington, DC: Office of Hydropower Licensing.Google Scholar
Gelfenbaum, Guy, Stevens, Andrew W., Miller, Ian, Warrick, Jonathan A., Ogston, Andrea S., Eidam, Emily. 2015. “Large-Scale Dam Removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: Coastal Geomorphic Change.” Geomorphology, 246: 649–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowan, Charles, Stephenson, Kurt, and Shabman, Leonard. 2006. “The Role of Ecosystem Valuation in Environmental Decision Making: Hydropower Relicensing and Dam Removal on the Elwha River.” Ecological Economics, 56: 508–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, Charles W. 1987. “Project Benefits and Costs from National and Regional Viewpoints: Methodological Issues and Case Study of the Colorado-Big Thompson Project.” Natural Resources Journal, 27: 5–20.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, Dale W., and Yun, Kun-Young . 1991. “The Excess Burden of Taxation in the United States.” Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 6(4): 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelman, S. 1981. “Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Ethical Critique.” Regulation, 5: 33–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Kosnik, Lea-Rachel. 2006. “Sources of Bureaucratic Delay: A Case Study of FERC Dam Relicensing.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 22(1), 258–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotchen, Matthew, Moore, Michael, Lupi, Frank, and Rutherford, E.S.. 2006. “Environmental Constraints on Hydropower: An Ex Post Benefit-Cost Analysis of Dam Relicensing in Michigan.” Land Economics, 82(3): 384–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Lynne, Bohlen, Curtis, and Wilson, Sarah. 2008. “Dams, Dam Removal, and River Restoration: A Hedonic Property Value Analysis.” Contemporary Economic Policy, 26: 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, John A., and Gallet, Craig A.. 2001. “What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values? Evidence from a Meta-Analysis .” Environmental and Resource Economics, 20: 241–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, Joseph, and Berrens, Robert. 2004. “Explaining Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values: Further Investigation Using Meta-analysis .” Economics Bulletin, 3(6): 1–13.Google Scholar
Loomis, John B. 1996. “Measuring the Economic Benefits of Removing Dams and Restoring the Elwha River: Results of a Contingent Valuation Survey.” Water Resources Research, 32(2): 441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomis, John B. 2002. “Quantifying Recreation Use Values from Removing Dams and Restoring Free-Flowing Rivers: A Contingent Behavior Travel Cost Demand Model for the Lower Snake River.” Water Resources Research, 38(6): 1066–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKean, John, Johnson, Donn, and Taylor, R. Garth. 2012. “Three Approaches to Time Valuation in Recreation Demand: A Study of the Snake River Recreation Area in Eastern Washington.” Journal of Environmental Management, 112: 321–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKean, John, Johnson, Donn, and Taylor, R. Garth. 2010. “Willingness-to-Pay for Steelhead Trout Fishing: Implications of Two-Step Consumer Decisions with Short-Run Endowments.” Water Resources Research, 46(9): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Philip A., and Lichtkoppler, Richard. 1995. Elwha River Restoration Project: Economic Analysis – Final Technical Report. Davis, CA.Google Scholar
Navrud, Stale, and Ready, Richard, eds. 2002. Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Null, Sarah E., Medellin-Azuara , Josue, Escriva-Bou , Alvar, Lent, Michelle, and Lund, Jay. 2014. “Optimizing the Dammed: Water Supply Losses and Fish Habitat Gains from Dam Removal in California.” Journal of Environmental Management, 136: 121–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Office of Management and Budget. 1992. Circular A-94: Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs. Available at https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/a94/a094.pdf. (accessed July 20, 2017)Google Scholar
Office of Management and Budget. 2016. Draft Report to Congress on the Benefits and Costs of Federal Regulations and Agency Compliance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act. Executive Office of the President. Available at https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/legislative_reports/draft_2016_cost_benefit_report_12_14_2016_2.pdf. (accessed March 3, 2018)Google Scholar
Pohl, Molly. 2002. “Bringing Down Our Dams: Trends in American Dam Removal Rationales.” Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 38(6): 1511–1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provencher, Bill, Sarakinos, Helen, and Meyer, Tanya. 2008. “Does Small Dam Removal Affect Local Property Values? An Empirical Analysis.” Contemporary Economic Policy, 26(2): 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes , Raymon. J., Whitehead, John C., Smith, Theodore I. J., and Denson, Michael R.. 2018. “A Benefit-Cost Analysis of a Red Drum Stock Enhancement Program in South Carolina.” Journal of Benefit Cost Analysis, 2018: 1–19.Google Scholar
Rizzo, Ilde, and Mignosa, Anna, eds. 2013. Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Jesse, and Lewis, Lynne. 2008. “Demolish It and They Will Come: Estimating the Economic Impacts of Restoring a Recreational Fishery.” Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 44(6): 1488–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratus Consulting. 2015. Economic Valuation of Restoration Actions for Salmon and Forests and Associated Wildlife in and Along the Elwha River. Available at http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/pdf/Economic_Valuation_of_Restoration_Actions_for_Salmon_and_Forests_and_Associated_Wildlife_in_the_Elwha_River.pdf. (accessed October 1, 2017)Google Scholar
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2017. Extension of Recreational and Commercial Fishing Closure Announced for Elwha River and Its Tributaries. Available at http://wdfw.wa.gov/news/mar3117a/. (accessed July 25, 2017)Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bellas and Kosnik supplementary material

Bellas and Kosnik supplementary material

Download Bellas and Kosnik supplementary material(File)
File 469.9 KB