Article contents
Woman and the Sacred in Ancient Tamilnad
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 March 2011
Abstract
We possess in ancient Tamil a large body of poetry which antedates for all intents and purposes the incursion of Sanskrit culture into Tamilnad. This poetry, found in the eight anthologies and the Pattuppāṭṭu, dates from the first and second centuries A.D. The culture which produced it was a continuation of the megalithic culture which dominated the Deccan for the millenium before Christ. The special importance of early Tamil poetry for cultural history is that it describes this civilization, which according to the Allchins was characterized by a very conservative and unchanging culture, before it was appreciably influenced by Sanskritic culture from the North. Thus a study of early Tamil reveals elements which were contributed to India by this culture and which were later assimilated by the rest of India. Other sources for this culture—the Sattasaī in Māhārāṣṭrī, for example—show the influence of Sanskrit culture, so that it is not possible to determine from them which elements belonged originally to the Deccan culture and which to the culture of the North.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1973
References
Ai: Ai kurunūṟu.
Ai kurunūṟu. Cmmentator: P. V. Cōmacuntaraṉār. Madras, Kazhagam, 1966.
Ai kurunūṟu. Commentator: Auvai C. Turaicāmipiḷḷai. 3 vols. Annamalai University, 1957-58.
* Ai kurunūṟu Mūlamum Paḻaiyavuraiyum [With old commentary]. Annotator: U. V. Swamina thaier. Fifth edition. Madras, Kapīr Accukkūtam. 1957. Ak.: Akanāṉūṟu.Google Scholar
* Akanāṉūṟu. Commentator: N. M. Vekaṭacạmi Nāttar. Madras, Kazhagam, 1965.
Kur.: Kuṟuntokfai
Kuṟuntokfai, Commentator: P. V. Cōmacuntaraṉār. Madras, Kazhagam, 1965.
* Kuṟuntokai. Commentator: U. V. Swaminathaier. Fourth edition. Madras, Kapīr Accūukktam, 1962.
Puṟ.: Puṟanānūṟu.
Puṟanānūṟu. [With commentary]. Annotator: U. V. Swaminathaier. Sixth Edition. Madras, Kapīr Accukkūtam, 1963.
Puṟanānūṟu. Commentator: Turaicāmianpillai., Auvai C. 2 vols. Madras, Kazhagam, 1964, 1962.Google Scholar
1Allchin, B. and R., The Birth of Indian Civiliza-1957. tion: India and Pakistan before 900 B.C. (Balti-more, Md., 1968), p. 232.Google Scholar
2Swaminathaier, U. V. (editor), manimēkalai (Madras Kapīr Accukkūtam, 1965), 7.75–76.Google Scholar
3Crawley, E., The Mystic Rose (2 volumes New York, 1927), vol. 2, p. 198.Google Scholar
5 The tree causes foes to flee probably because it is a kāval maram, that is, a tutelary tree, a tree which is singled out to symbolize the king's connection with the world of the sacred, and which is guarded at all costs from being cut down by enemies.
6 See also Ai. 404.
7 For example, Ak. 16, 26, 66, 176.
8Westermarck, E., A History of Human Marriage (3 volumes, Fifth Edition, London, 1921), vol. 3, p. 67.Google Scholar
9 Puṟ. 166, 361.
10 Puṟ. 198; Ak. 16, 184.
11 The word for clan here is kuṭi. Ak. 184.
12 Puṟ. 201.
13 See also Puṟ. 122, Ai. 422.
14 See also Puṟ. 341, 350, 352.
15 See also Puṟ. 160, 164, 211, 276.
16 See also Ak. 83; Ai. 203, 303, 322, 327, 328, 360.
17 See below, p. 245.
18 Puṟ. 224, 246, 253, 261, 280.
19 Puṟ. 234, 249.
20 Westermarck, op. cit., vol. i, p. 326.
21The Mahābhārata for the First Time Critically Edited by Sukthankar, Vishnu S., etc. (Poona, 1933–1966).Google Scholar
22Böhtlingk, and Roth, R., Sanskrit-Wörterbuch (7 volumes, St. Petersburg, 1855–75), vol. 4, P. 412.Google Scholar
23Apte, V. S., The Student's English-Sanskrit Dictionary (Delhi, 1964), p. 377.Google Scholar
24 Manusmrti (Nirnayasāgara edition), 11.61, 2.213.
25 Crawley, op. cit., vol. 1, p. 287.
26 lbid., vol. :, p. 287.
27 Ibid., vol. 1, p. 286.
28 Puṟ. 276.
29 Kuṟ. 14, 17, 32, 173, 182, 298.
30 Crawley, op. cit., vol. 1, pp. 308–9.
31 Ibid., vol. i, pp. 300–301. 35 Kuṟ. 218.
32 Puṟ. 120; Kuṟ. 167.
33 Crawley, op. cit., vol. 2, p. 173.
34 Kuṟ. 192.
35 Kuṟ. 218.
36 Crawley, op. cit., vol. 1, p. 307.
37 Ak. 22.
38 ŚatapathabrŚhmana (Weber, editor), 11.5.2.20.
30Keith, A. B., The Religion and Philosophy of the Vedas and Upanishads (Oxford, 1961), p. 265.Google Scholar
40 Śatapathabrāhmana, op. cit., 4.5.9.
41 Mahabādrata, op. cit., 3.61.37–38.
42 Ibid., 9.62.
43Kane, P. V., The History of DharmaŚāstra (5 volumes, Poona, 1930–62), vol. 2, pp. 563ff.Google Scholar
44 Mahābhārata, op. cit., 3.68.
45Atharvaveda (V.V.R.I. edition), 2.615; Ṛgveda (Poona edition), X.40.2.Google Scholar
46 Kane, op. cit., vol. I, p. 135.
47Āpastambadharmasūtra (Bombay Sanskrit Series, edited by Bühler), 11.10.27.5–7.Google Scholar
48 Manusmrti, op. cit., 10.59–61; Mahābhārata, op. cit., 1.111–114.
49 Āpastambadharmasūtra, op. cit., 11.10.27.5–7; Manusmrti, op, cit., 9.64–68.
50 Kane, op. cit., vol. 2, p. 604.
51 Ibid., volume 2, p. 604.
52 Manusmrti, op. cit., 5.157–60.
53Skandapurāna (Vekaṭeśvara Press edition), III, Brahmāranya section, chapter 7, verses 50–51.Google Scholar
54 Kane, op. cit., vol. 2, p. 586; Skandapurāna, op. cit., Kāśīkjiānda, chapter 4.
55 See above, pp. 241–242.
56 Kane, op. cit., vol. 2, p. 586.
57 Ibid., vol. 2, pp. 587ff.
58The Vālmīki-Rāmāyana Critically Edited for the first time by G. H. Bhatt, etc. (Baroda, 1960―), 5.31.12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 21.Google Scholar
59 Ibid., 3.47.
60 Abhij ānaśsākuntalam (Nirnayasāgara edition), act 3.
61 Kane, op. cit., vol. 2, p. 625.
62 Strabo, XV.1.30 and 62.
63 Mahābhārata, op. cit., 1.90.75; 1.116.29.
64 Ibid., 4.22.8.
65 Ibid., 16.8.18.
66Winternitz, M., A History of Indian Literature (translator: S. Ketkar; Calcutta, 1962–1963), vol. 1, p. 444.Google Scholar
67 Kane, op. cit., vol. 2, p. 627; Aparārka on the Yājavalkyasmrti (Ānandāśrama Sanskrit Series edition), p. 112.
68 Fleet, Gupta Inscriptions, p. 91.
69Burrow, T., The Sanskfit Language (London, 1955), pp. 380–88.Google Scholar
70Hart, G. L., Related Cultural and Literary Elements in Ancient Tamil and Jndo-Aryan (A thesis submitted to Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., 1969). In the second part of this dissertation, I have listed many of the literary conventions and techniques used by Kālidāsa found before in the Tamil anthologies, but not in any Indo-Aryan works which I surveyed. Classical Sanskrit meters which can be shown to be of Dravidian origin include āryā and the other dvipadī meters based on mātrās, and all of the catuspadī meters based on mātrās.Google Scholar
- 11
- Cited by