Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:54:25.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Warring States, Ch'in, and Han Periods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2010

Donald Harper
Get access

Extract

Fundamental changes occurred in chinese civilization between the fifth century B.C.E. and the second century C.E., roughly corresponding to the Warring States (which officially commences in 453 B.C.E.) and the Ch'in and Han empires (Han rule ends in 220 C.E.). The emergence and maturation of philosophical speculation and of new sociopolitical models have traditionally constituted the ground on which other elements of the contemporary civilization have been drawn. As a consequence, the nature of religious traditions during this period has been poorly understood and insufficiently studied; first, because the documentation preserved in received literature overwhelmingly reflects the politico-philosophical leanings of an elite social stratum and thus offers only a partial, biased view of the range of religious belief and practice; and second, because modern research on Warring States, Ch'in, and Han religion by and large relies on the viewpoints expressed in the received record. Whereas the study of Buddhism and, more recently, of religious Taoism and popular religion is thriving among an ever-growing number of scholars of the history of Chinese religion, the ancient period of Warring States, Ch'in, and Han is still dominated by scholars engaged in the study of the philosophical tradition. The idea that religious belief during the period was tempered by philosophical reason is a widely shared assumption.

Type
Chinese Religions—The State of the Field, Part I. Early Religious Traditions: The Neolithic Period through the Han Dynasty (ca. 4000 B.C.E to 220 C.E.)
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 152 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Poul, Andersen. 1989-1990. “The Practice of Bugang.” Cahiers d'Extrême-Asie 5:15–53.Google Scholar
Anonymous, . 1981. “Chiang-su Han-chiang Hu-ch'ang wu-hao Han-mu” [Hu-ch'ang Han tomb 5, Han-chiang, Chiang-su]. Wen-wu 11:12–20.Google Scholar
Derk, Bodde. 1961. “Myths of Ancient China.” In Kramer, Samuel N., ed., Mythologies of the Ancient World, pp. 367–408. Garden City: Doubleday and Company.Google Scholar
Derk, Bodde. 1975. festivals in Classical China: New Year and Other Annual Observances During the Han Dynasty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Campany, Robert F. 1990. “Return-From-Death Narratives in Early Medieval China.” Journal of Chinese Religions 18:91–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, I-Mou, and Hsiao, Tso-T'ao. 1988. Ma-wang-tui i-shu k'ao-chu [Critical study and annotation of the Ma-wang-tui medical books]. Tientsin. Tientsin k'o-hsueh chi-shu ch'u-pan she.Google Scholar
Chou, Shih-Jung. 1990. “Ma-wang-tui Han-mu te shen-ch'i t'u po-hua” [The painted silk chart of the spirits of heaven and earth from the Ma-wang-tui Han tomb]. K'ao-ku 10:925–28.Google Scholar
Ebrey, Patricia Buckley. 1991. Confucianism and Family Rituals in Imperial China. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenhausen, Lotharvon. 1990. “Ahnenkult und Grabkult im staat Qin: der religiöse Hintergrund der Terracotta-Armee.” In Ledderose, L. and Schlombs, A., eds., Jenseits der grossen Mauer: der erste Gottkaiser von Qin und seine Terracotta-Armee, pp. 35–48. Munich: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
Riccardo, Fracasso. 1983. “Teratoscopy or Divination by Monsters: Being a Study on the Wu-tsang Shan-ching.” Han-hsüehyen-chiu: Chinese Studies 1.2:657–700.Google Scholar
Riccardo, Fracasso. 1988. “Holy Mothers of Ancient China: A New Approach to the Hsi-wang-mu Problem.” T'oung Pao 74:1–46.Google Scholar
Graham, A. C. 1989. Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
Marcel, Granet. 1925. “Remarques sur le taoisme ancien.” Asia Major 2 (Reprinted in Granet 1953:245-49).Google Scholar
Marcel, Granet. 1953. Études sociologiques sur la Chine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Donald, Harper. 1982. “The Wu Shih Erh Ping Fang: Translation and Prolegomena.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Donald, Harper. 1985. “A Chinese Demonography of the Third Century B.C.,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 45:459–98.Google Scholar
Donald, Harper. 1990. “The Conception of Illness in Early Chinese Medicine, as Documented in Newly Discovered 3rd and 2nd Century B.C. Manuscripts (Part I),” Sudhoffs Archiv 74: 210–35.Google Scholar
Donald, Harper. Forthcoming. “Resurrection in Warring States Popular Religion.” To appear in Taoist Resources.Google Scholar
David, Hawkes. 1985. The Songs of the South. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Maxime, Kaltenmark. 1961. “Religion and Politics in the China of the Ts'in and the Han.” Diogenes 34:16–43.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Karlgren. 1946. “Legends and Cults in Ancient China.” Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities 18:199–365.Google Scholar
Hsüeh-Ch'in, Li. 1990. “Fang-ma-t'an chien-chung-te chih-kuai ku-shih” [The marvel story contained in the Fang-ma-t'an bamboo-slip manuscripts]. Wen-wu 4:43–47.Google Scholar
Hsüeh-Ch'in, Li. 1991. “Ping-pi T'ai-sui-ko hsin-cheng” [A new proof concerning the halberd with the inscription “weapons avoid Great Year”]. Chiang Han k'ao-ku 2:35–39.Google Scholar
Ling, Li. 1990. “Formulaic Structure of Chu Divinatory Bamboo Slips.” Early China 15:71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Loewe. 1979. Ways to Paradise: The Chinese Quest for Immortality. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Henri, Maspero. 1948–1951. “Le Ming-t'ang et la crise religieuse chinoise avant les Han.” Mélanges Chinois et Bouddhiques 9:1–71.Google Scholar
Rémi, Mathieu. 1983. Étude sur la mythologie et I'ethnologie de la Chine ancienne. Traduction annotée du Shanhai jing. Paris: Collège de France, Institut des Hautes Études Chinoises.Google Scholar
Rickett, W. Allyn. 1985. Guanzi: Political, Economic, and Philosophical Essays from Early China, vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Anna, Seidel. 1982. “Tokens of Immortality in Han Graves.” Numen 24:79–122.Google Scholar
Anna, Seidel. 1987. “Traces of Han Religion in Funerary Texts Found in Tombs.” In Akizuki, Kan'ei, ed., Dokyo to shiikyo bunka, pp. 21–57. Tokyo: Hirakawa.Google Scholar
Denis, Twitchett, and Michael, Loewe. 1986. The Cambridge History of China, vol. 1, The Ch'in and Han Empires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Léon, Vandermeersch. 1980. Wangdao: ou, La Voie Royale, vol. 2, Structures politiques, Lesrites. Paris: École Française d'Extrême-Orient.Google Scholar
Hung, Wu. 1989. The Wu Liang Shrine: The Ideology of Early Chinese Pictorial Art. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar